- From: Annette Greiner via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2021 01:28:13 +0000
- To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
As a part of DCAT, a binary indicator of backward compatibility for a dataset doesn't strike me as a good idea, since what makes a dataset unusable for one purpose has no effect on another, so I vote for 1. I agree it's a good idea to provide a changelog for a dataset, and VersionNotes is a very reasonable place for that. I think that backward compatibility should be noted for a vocabulary in the spec for the vocab itself. I don't think that a vocabulary is data unless you take the point of view that everything on the web is data, which is of course philosophically defensible but doesn't help in scoping a vocabulary like DCAT. It seems to me a binary indicator of backward compatibility for a dataset as a whole is more likely to be misleading than not. -- GitHub Notification of comment by agreiner Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/1258#issuecomment-784665032 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Wednesday, 24 February 2021 01:28:15 UTC