public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org from August 2016 by date

Wednesday, 31 August 2016

RDF Shapes WG agenda for 1 September 2016 Arnaud Le Hors
RDF Data Shapes WG Minutes for 25 August 2016 Arnaud Le Hors
Re: Please review the SHACL draft (was Re: Editing progress) Holger Knublauch

Friday, 26 August 2016

Call for Exclusions: SHACL Core Abstract Syntax and Semantics Xueyuan Jia
Re: Quick Comments on https://www.w3.org/TR/2016/WD-shacl-20160814/ Dimitris Kontokostas

Thursday, 25 August 2016

Re: comments / questions on the SHACL abstract syntax document Holger Knublauch
shapes-ACTION-40: Send a thank you to pfps, linking https://www.w3.org/2014/data-shapes/wiki/public_comments#peter.27s_email_2016-08-16 RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker
Re: Fwd: Quick Comments on https://www.w3.org/TR/2016/WD-shacl-20160814/ Karen Coyle
Re: comments / questions on the SHACL abstract syntax document Eric Prud'hommeaux

Wednesday, 24 August 2016

RDF Data Shapes WG agenda for 25 August 2016 Eric Prud'hommeaux

Saturday, 20 August 2016

shapes-ISSUE-176 (Rules): Should SHACL include a (simple) rules feature [SHACL - SPARQL] RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker

Wednesday, 17 August 2016

RDF Data Shapes 18 August 2016 call cancelled Arnaud Le Hors
RDF Data Shapes WG minutes for 11 August 2016 Arnaud Le Hors

Tuesday, 16 August 2016

Fwd: Quick Comments on https://www.w3.org/TR/2016/WD-shacl-20160814/ Holger Knublauch

Monday, 15 August 2016

Transition Request: FPWD for SHACL Core Abstract Syntax and Semantics (Data Shapes) Eric Prud'hommeaux

Sunday, 14 August 2016

Re: [W3C Process] Specberus errors when attempting to publish SHACL spec Holger Knublauch
Re: [W3C Process] Specberus errors when attempting to publish SHACL spec Irene Polikoff
Re: [W3C Process] Specberus errors when attempting to publish SHACL spec Holger Knublauch
Re: [W3C Process] Specberus errors when attempting to publish SHACL spec Irene Polikoff
Re: [W3C Process] Specberus errors when attempting to publish SHACL spec Holger Knublauch

Saturday, 13 August 2016

Re: [W3C Process] Specberus errors when attempting to publish SHACL spec Eric Prud'hommeaux
Re: [W3C Process] Specberus errors when attempting to publish SHACL spec Holger Knublauch

Friday, 12 August 2016

Re: an alternative proposal for partition Karen Coyle
Re: an alternative proposal for partition Karen Coyle
Re: an alternative proposal for partition Dimitris Kontokostas
Re: [W3C Process] Specberus errors when attempting to publish SHACL spec Simon Steyskal
Re: an alternative proposal for partition Holger Knublauch
[W3C Process] Specberus errors when attempting to publish SHACL spec Holger Knublauch
Re: an alternative proposal for partition Eric Prud'hommeaux
Re: Please review the SHACL draft (was Re: Editing progress) Holger Knublauch
Re: Please review the SHACL draft (was Re: Editing progress) Eric Prud'hommeaux

Thursday, 11 August 2016

Re: Please review the SHACL draft (was Re: Editing progress) Holger Knublauch
Re: Please review the SHACL draft (was Re: Editing progress) Eric Prud'hommeaux
Re: an alternative proposal for partition Holger Knublauch
an alternative proposal for partition Eric Prud'hommeaux
Re: Please review the SHACL draft (was Re: Editing progress) Karen Coyle

Wednesday, 10 August 2016

RDF Data Shapes WG agenda for 11 August 2016 Arnaud Le Hors
Re: Please review the SHACL draft (was Re: Editing progress) Holger Knublauch

Tuesday, 9 August 2016

Re: Please review the SHACL draft (was Re: Editing progress) Karen Coyle
Please review the SHACL draft (was Re: Editing progress) Arnaud Le Hors

Monday, 8 August 2016

Editing progress Holger Knublauch

Thursday, 4 August 2016

RDF Data Shapes WG minutes for 4 August 2016 Arnaud Le Hors
RDF Data Shapes WG agenda for 4 Augutst 2016 Arnaud Le Hors

Wednesday, 3 August 2016

ISSUE-92: sh:partition (again) Holger Knublauch

Last message date: Wednesday, 31 August 2016 23:01:20 UTC