W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org > August 2016

Re: [W3C Process] Specberus errors when attempting to publish SHACL spec

From: Simon Steyskal <simon.steyskal@wu.ac.at>
Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2016 08:29:49 +0200
To: Holger Knublauch <holger@topquadrant.com>
Cc: public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <e3fe5a31e7ed1fbbbd7cbe56ebc5c79c@wu.ac.at>
Hi!

>  "key": "no-disclosures",
>  "type": {
>  "name": "sotd.pp"
> .............
>  To me these look like problems in the header metdata, but I am not
> aware of changes from our side. I tried to make sense of this using
> https://www.w3.org/pubrules [2] and the little info that I could find
> on specberus, but maybe those more experienced with the W3C process
> (cough, Eric) may have seen this before?

Sounds like it's about the document status section [1]:

"ยง It MUST include this text related to patent policy requirements (with 
suitable links inserted; see guidelines for linking to disclosure 
pages):

     This document was produced by a group operating under the 5 February 
2004 W3C Patent Policy. W3C maintains a public list of any patent 
disclosures made in connection with the deliverables of the group; that 
page also includes instructions for disclosing a patent. An individual 
who has actual knowledge of a patent which the individual believes 
contains Essential Claim(s) must disclose the information in accordance 
with section 6 of the W3C Patent Policy."

cheers,
simon

[1] https://www.w3.org/pubrules/doc/rules/?profile=WD#document-status

---
DDipl.-Ing. Simon Steyskal
Institute for Information Business, WU Vienna

www: http://www.steyskal.info/  twitter: @simonsteys

Am 2016-08-12 05:03, schrieb Holger Knublauch:
> I was trying to publish a new version of the SHACL spec using Echidna
> but this time got two new errors that I cannot explain:
> 
> "specberus": {
>  "status": "failure",
>  "errors": [
>  {
>  "key": "no-disclosures",
>  "type": {
>  "name": "sotd.pp"
>  }
>  },
>  {
>  "key": "no-homepage",
>  "extra": {
>  "homepage": "http://www.w3.org/2014/data-shapes/ [1]"
>  },
>  "type": {
>  "name": "sotd.group-homepage",
>  "section": "document-status",
>  "rule": "WGLink"
>  }
>  }
>  ]
>  },
>  To me these look like problems in the header metdata, but I am not
> aware of changes from our side. I tried to make sense of this using
> https://www.w3.org/pubrules [2] and the little info that I could find
> on specberus, but maybe those more experienced with the W3C process
> (cough, Eric) may have seen this before?
> 
>  (Besides, what would be the URL to give to the pubrules test server?
> I tried
> https://raw.githubusercontent.com/w3c/data-shapes/gh-pages/shacl/index.html
> [3] but that produces 28 errors).
> 
>  Thanks!
>  Holger
> 
> 
> 
> Links:
> ------
> [1] http://www.w3.org/2014/data-shapes/
> [2] https://www.w3.org/pubrules
> [3] 
> https://raw.githubusercontent.com/w3c/data-shapes/gh-pages/shacl/index.html
Received on Friday, 12 August 2016 06:30:20 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 12 August 2016 06:30:20 UTC