W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org > August 2016

Re: [W3C Process] Specberus errors when attempting to publish SHACL spec

From: Holger Knublauch <holger@topquadrant.com>
Date: Sat, 13 Aug 2016 14:07:35 +1000
To: public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <c41cb4d8-a5fa-c28f-7c5a-f5e43ea1a352@topquadrant.com>
Hi Simon,

thanks for looking into this. I see still nothing wrong. The

<section id="sotd"></section>

that produces this text is still there and hasn't been changed for 
months. Also, we do have an entry

wgPatentURI:  "http://www.w3.org/2004/01/pp-impl/73865/status",

which will be used to populate the patent policy. I did some more 
(failed) attempts playing with document status (to WD). I also compared 
our metadata with one that was recently published without problems, but 
don't see any real differences.

I am clueless at this stage and will need to post to some other W3C 
mailing list (unless someone here has other ideas). Just to let you know 
that we have a delay with the publication.

Holger


On 12/08/2016 16:29, Simon Steyskal wrote:
> Hi!
>
>>  "key": "no-disclosures",
>>  "type": {
>>  "name": "sotd.pp"
>> .............
>>  To me these look like problems in the header metdata, but I am not
>> aware of changes from our side. I tried to make sense of this using
>> https://www.w3.org/pubrules [2] and the little info that I could find
>> on specberus, but maybe those more experienced with the W3C process
>> (cough, Eric) may have seen this before?
>
> Sounds like it's about the document status section [1]:
>
> "ยง It MUST include this text related to patent policy requirements 
> (with suitable links inserted; see guidelines for linking to 
> disclosure pages):
>
>     This document was produced by a group operating under the 5 
> February 2004 W3C Patent Policy. W3C maintains a public list of any 
> patent disclosures made in connection with the deliverables of the 
> group; that page also includes instructions for disclosing a patent. 
> An individual who has actual knowledge of a patent which the 
> individual believes contains Essential Claim(s) must disclose the 
> information in accordance with section 6 of the W3C Patent Policy."
>
> cheers,
> simon
>
> [1] https://www.w3.org/pubrules/doc/rules/?profile=WD#document-status
>
> ---
> DDipl.-Ing. Simon Steyskal
> Institute for Information Business, WU Vienna
>
> www: http://www.steyskal.info/  twitter: @simonsteys
>
> Am 2016-08-12 05:03, schrieb Holger Knublauch:
>> I was trying to publish a new version of the SHACL spec using Echidna
>> but this time got two new errors that I cannot explain:
>>
>> "specberus": {
>>  "status": "failure",
>>  "errors": [
>>  {
>>  "key": "no-disclosures",
>>  "type": {
>>  "name": "sotd.pp"
>>  }
>>  },
>>  {
>>  "key": "no-homepage",
>>  "extra": {
>>  "homepage": "http://www.w3.org/2014/data-shapes/ [1]"
>>  },
>>  "type": {
>>  "name": "sotd.group-homepage",
>>  "section": "document-status",
>>  "rule": "WGLink"
>>  }
>>  }
>>  ]
>>  },
>>  To me these look like problems in the header metdata, but I am not
>> aware of changes from our side. I tried to make sense of this using
>> https://www.w3.org/pubrules [2] and the little info that I could find
>> on specberus, but maybe those more experienced with the W3C process
>> (cough, Eric) may have seen this before?
>>
>>  (Besides, what would be the URL to give to the pubrules test server?
>> I tried
>> https://raw.githubusercontent.com/w3c/data-shapes/gh-pages/shacl/index.html 
>>
>> [3] but that produces 28 errors).
>>
>>  Thanks!
>>  Holger
>>
>>
>>
>> Links:
>> ------
>> [1] http://www.w3.org/2014/data-shapes/
>> [2] https://www.w3.org/pubrules
>> [3] 
>> https://raw.githubusercontent.com/w3c/data-shapes/gh-pages/shacl/index.html
Received on Saturday, 13 August 2016 04:08:08 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Saturday, 13 August 2016 04:08:09 UTC