Please review the SHACL draft (was Re: Editing progress)

Thanks Holger for the update. Let's talk on Thursday about the 
requirements to move the spec to Candidate Recommendation (CR). 
Unfortunately I don't think we're quite there yet. Here is quick run 
through the main requirements:

* all known issues impacting conformance of an implementation have been 
closed.
* proof of wide review - we need to publish a draft and broadly announce 
it calling for public comments prior to moving to CR
* test suite - we at least need to have the framework in place that the 
specification can point to
* exit criteria - how do we define what it will take to exit CR - 
typically a minimum of two implementations of every feature

So, for now, please, everyone, review the spec and let's see on Thursday 
whether we can agree to publish the updated spec.

Eric and Karen, if you have a chance to update the abstract syntax draft 
that'd be great. Please, let the WG know when you're done.

Thanks.
--
Arnaud  Le Hors - Senior Technical Staff Member, Open Web Technologies - 
IBM Cloud




From:   Holger Knublauch <holger@topquadrant.com>
To:     "public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org" <public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org>
Date:   08/08/2016 04:17 PM
Subject:        Editing progress



FYI I did a complete pass through the spec over the last couple of days 
and fixed a number of inconsistencies and buglets. Dimitris also did 
some updates. In the upcoming meeting we may want to decide to press the 
publish button again? I would be interested to hear what is missing with 
respect to reaching the next phase of the W3C process.

Holger