W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org > August 2016

Re: Please review the SHACL draft (was Re: Editing progress)

From: Karen Coyle <kcoyle@kcoyle.net>
Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2016 09:07:43 -0700
To: public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <a94da120-0038-9f8d-aa26-a644bdece8a8@kcoyle.net>
Holger, the way section 2 now reads there are targets, filter shapes, 
and constraints. Filters are defined as shapes, but neither targets nor 
constraints are defined in that way. This seems inconsistent and the 
actual meaning of shape seems less clear. Sometimes it seems to refer to 
the set of targets, filters and constraints, sometimes it seems to refer 
to an individual filter segment.

In the abstract syntax we have:

Shape := label:IRI|BNode, scopes:Set[Scope], filters:Set[Shape], 
constraints:Set[Constraint]

Using target that will become:

Shape := label:IRI|BNode, targets:Set[Target], filters:Set[Shape], 
constraints:Set[Constraint]

kc



On 8/8/16 5:20 PM, Arnaud Le Hors wrote:
> Thanks Holger for the update. Let's talk on Thursday about the
> requirements to move the spec to Candidate Recommendation (CR).
> Unfortunately I don't think we're quite there yet. Here is quick run
> through the main requirements:
>
> * all known issues impacting conformance of an implementation have been
> closed.
> * proof of wide review - we need to publish a draft and broadly announce
> it calling for public comments prior to moving to CR
> * test suite - we at least need to have the framework in place that the
> specification can point to
> * exit criteria - how do we define what it will take to exit CR -
> typically a minimum of two implementations of every feature
>
> So, for now, please, everyone, review the spec and let's see on Thursday
> whether we can agree to publish the updated spec.
>
> Eric and Karen, if you have a chance to update the abstract syntax draft
> that'd be great. Please, let the WG know when you're done.
>
> Thanks.
> --
> Arnaud  Le Hors - Senior Technical Staff Member, Open Web Technologies -
> IBM Cloud
>
>
>
>
> From:        Holger Knublauch <holger@topquadrant.com>
> To:        "public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org" <public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org>
> Date:        08/08/2016 04:17 PM
> Subject:        Editing progress
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
> FYI I did a complete pass through the spec over the last couple of days
> and fixed a number of inconsistencies and buglets. Dimitris also did
> some updates. In the upcoming meeting we may want to decide to press the
> publish button again? I would be interested to hear what is missing with
> respect to reaching the next phase of the W3C process.
>
> Holger
>
>
>
>
>

-- 
Karen Coyle
kcoyle@kcoyle.net http://kcoyle.net
m: 1-510-435-8234
skype: kcoylenet/+1-510-984-3600
Received on Tuesday, 9 August 2016 16:08:15 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:30:36 UTC