public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org from August 2016 by author

Arnaud Le Hors

RDF Shapes WG agenda for 1 September 2016 (Wednesday, 31 August)
RDF Data Shapes WG Minutes for 25 August 2016 (Wednesday, 31 August)
RDF Data Shapes 18 August 2016 call cancelled (Wednesday, 17 August)
RDF Data Shapes WG minutes for 11 August 2016 (Wednesday, 17 August)
RDF Data Shapes WG agenda for 11 August 2016 (Wednesday, 10 August)
Please review the SHACL draft (was Re: Editing progress) (Tuesday, 9 August)
RDF Data Shapes WG minutes for 4 August 2016 (Thursday, 4 August)
RDF Data Shapes WG agenda for 4 Augutst 2016 (Thursday, 4 August)

Dimitris Kontokostas

Re: Quick Comments on https://www.w3.org/TR/2016/WD-shacl-20160814/ (Friday, 26 August)
Re: an alternative proposal for partition (Friday, 12 August)

Eric Prud'hommeaux

Re: comments / questions on the SHACL abstract syntax document (Thursday, 25 August)
RDF Data Shapes WG agenda for 25 August 2016 (Wednesday, 24 August)
Transition Request: FPWD for SHACL Core Abstract Syntax and Semantics (Data Shapes) (Monday, 15 August)
Re: [W3C Process] Specberus errors when attempting to publish SHACL spec (Saturday, 13 August)
Re: an alternative proposal for partition (Friday, 12 August)
Re: Please review the SHACL draft (was Re: Editing progress) (Friday, 12 August)
Re: Please review the SHACL draft (was Re: Editing progress) (Thursday, 11 August)
an alternative proposal for partition (Thursday, 11 August)

Holger Knublauch

Re: Please review the SHACL draft (was Re: Editing progress) (Wednesday, 31 August)
Re: comments / questions on the SHACL abstract syntax document (Thursday, 25 August)
Fwd: Quick Comments on https://www.w3.org/TR/2016/WD-shacl-20160814/ (Tuesday, 16 August)
Re: [W3C Process] Specberus errors when attempting to publish SHACL spec (Sunday, 14 August)
Re: [W3C Process] Specberus errors when attempting to publish SHACL spec (Sunday, 14 August)
Re: [W3C Process] Specberus errors when attempting to publish SHACL spec (Sunday, 14 August)
Re: [W3C Process] Specberus errors when attempting to publish SHACL spec (Saturday, 13 August)
Re: an alternative proposal for partition (Friday, 12 August)
[W3C Process] Specberus errors when attempting to publish SHACL spec (Friday, 12 August)
Re: Please review the SHACL draft (was Re: Editing progress) (Friday, 12 August)
Re: Please review the SHACL draft (was Re: Editing progress) (Thursday, 11 August)
Re: an alternative proposal for partition (Thursday, 11 August)
Re: Please review the SHACL draft (was Re: Editing progress) (Wednesday, 10 August)
Editing progress (Monday, 8 August)
ISSUE-92: sh:partition (again) (Wednesday, 3 August)

Irene Polikoff

Re: [W3C Process] Specberus errors when attempting to publish SHACL spec (Sunday, 14 August)
Re: [W3C Process] Specberus errors when attempting to publish SHACL spec (Sunday, 14 August)

Karen Coyle

Re: Fwd: Quick Comments on https://www.w3.org/TR/2016/WD-shacl-20160814/ (Thursday, 25 August)
Re: an alternative proposal for partition (Friday, 12 August)
Re: an alternative proposal for partition (Friday, 12 August)
Re: Please review the SHACL draft (was Re: Editing progress) (Thursday, 11 August)
Re: Please review the SHACL draft (was Re: Editing progress) (Tuesday, 9 August)

RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker

shapes-ACTION-40: Send a thank you to pfps, linking https://www.w3.org/2014/data-shapes/wiki/public_comments#peter.27s_email_2016-08-16 (Thursday, 25 August)
shapes-ISSUE-176 (Rules): Should SHACL include a (simple) rules feature [SHACL - SPARQL] (Saturday, 20 August)

Simon Steyskal

Re: [W3C Process] Specberus errors when attempting to publish SHACL spec (Friday, 12 August)

Xueyuan Jia

Call for Exclusions: SHACL Core Abstract Syntax and Semantics (Friday, 26 August)

Last message date: Wednesday, 31 August 2016 23:01:20 UTC