public-browser-tools-testing@w3.org from April to June 2014 by author

Andreas Tolfsen

• Re: WebDriver Test Suite (Friday, 27 June)
• Re: Next WebDriver F2F (Wednesday, 23 April)

bugzilla@jessica.w3.org

• [Bug 24924] Inconsistent names in screenshot capabilities (Monday, 30 June)
• [Bug 20860] WebDriver Level 1 (Monday, 30 June)
• [Bug 20860] WebDriver Level 1 (Monday, 30 June)
• [Bug 25692] 16 - It's not told what should happen if element is not passed to "takeScreenshot" (Monday, 30 June)
• [Bug 20860] WebDriver Level 1 (Monday, 30 June)
• [Bug 23869] Describe httpOnly more clearly (Monday, 30 June)
• [Bug 25668] Nit: Capabilities.has spec can be simplified (Monday, 30 June)
• [Bug 20860] WebDriver Level 1 (Monday, 30 June)
• [Bug 26131] 10.4 - atoms contain a different algorithm from defined for getCssValue (Monday, 30 June)
• [Bug 26228] [WebDriver Spec] 11.2.1 executeScript doesn't specify how to handle self-recursive objects (Saturday, 28 June)
• [Bug 26228] New: [WebDriver Spec] 11.2.1 executeScript doesn't specify how to handle self-recursive objects (Saturday, 28 June)
• [Bug 20860] WebDriver Level 1 (Friday, 20 June)
• [Bug 26130] 10.4 - typos in getCssValue section (Friday, 20 June)
• [Bug 20860] WebDriver Level 1 (Friday, 20 June)
• [Bug 26130] 10.4 - typos in getCssValue section (Friday, 20 June)
• [Bug 20860] WebDriver Level 1 (Friday, 20 June)
• [Bug 26130] 10.4 - typos in getCssValue section (Friday, 20 June)
• [Bug 26158] New: JSON serialization of element does not make clear that JSON represents an element (Friday, 20 June)
• [Bug 26156] Spec missing isEnabled command (Friday, 20 June)
• [Bug 26156] New: Spec missing isEnabled command (Friday, 20 June)
• [Bug 26151] New: [WebDriver Spec]: 2.6 Simplify JSON wire protocol to use one URL (Thursday, 19 June)
• [Bug 26147] New: Don't conflate attributes and properties in getElementAttribute (Thursday, 19 June)
• [Bug 26137] New: [WebDriver Spec]: Algorithm for serializing a result is broken (Wednesday, 18 June)
• [Bug 26131] New: 10.4 - atoms contain a different algorithm from defined for getCssValue (Wednesday, 18 June)
• [Bug 26130] New: 10.4 - typos in getCssValue section (Wednesday, 18 June)
• [Bug 20860] WebDriver Level 1 (Wednesday, 18 June)
• [Bug 25059] Web IDL doesn't seem to have "number" type (Wednesday, 18 June)
• [Bug 25941] getCssValue isn't defined by the spec (Tuesday, 17 June)
• [Bug 20860] WebDriver Level 1 (Tuesday, 17 June)
• [Bug 24132] getElementPosition is not in the spec (Tuesday, 17 June)
• [Bug 20860] WebDriver Level 1 (Tuesday, 17 June)
• [Bug 20860] WebDriver Level 1 (Tuesday, 17 June)
• [Bug 25095] [WebDriver Spec]: getTitle is not documented (Tuesday, 17 June)
• [Bug 25095] [WebDriver Spec]: getTitle is not documented (Tuesday, 17 June)
• [Bug 20860] WebDriver Level 1 (Tuesday, 17 June)
• [Bug 20860] WebDriver Level 1 (Monday, 16 June)
• [Bug 25095] [WebDriver Spec]: getTitle is not documented (Monday, 16 June)
• [Bug 20860] WebDriver Level 1 (Monday, 16 June)
• [Bug 26096] WebDriver#get lacks info about timeouts and situation when there is no selected window (Monday, 16 June)
• [Bug 26096] New: WebDriver#get lacks info about timeouts and situation when there is no selected window (Saturday, 14 June)
• [Bug 26092] New: findElement doesn't tell that it should find element only inside current element (Friday, 13 June)
• [Bug 20860] WebDriver Level 1 (Friday, 13 June)
• [Bug 26091] getTitle is not defined by the spec (Friday, 13 June)
• [Bug 26091] New: getTitle is not defined by the spec (Friday, 13 June)
• [Bug 26031] New: 10.4.1: getElementText does not take into account CSS generated content (Tuesday, 10 June)
• [Bug 25941] New: getCssValue isn't defined by the spec (Sunday, 1 June)
• [Bug 25755] 15.2 - typo "Model" -> "Modal" (Monday, 19 May)
• [Bug 20860] WebDriver Level 1 (Monday, 19 May)
• [Bug 25756] New: 14.3.3 - Meta and Command aren't considered as modifier keys (Saturday, 17 May)
• [Bug 25755] New: 15.2 - typo "Model" -> "Modal" (Saturday, 17 May)
• [Bug 20860] WebDriver Level 1 (Friday, 16 May)
• [Bug 25748] 15.1 - Alerts#getText should raise an error if there is no alert (Friday, 16 May)
• [Bug 20860] WebDriver Level 1 (Friday, 16 May)
• [Bug 25751] 15.2 - use "local end" instead of "client end" (Friday, 16 May)
• [Bug 20860] WebDriver Level 1 (Friday, 16 May)
• [Bug 25182] Should element with 0 clientWidth and clientHeight be considered visible? (Friday, 16 May)
• [Bug 20860] WebDriver Level 1 (Friday, 16 May)
• [Bug 25736] "Determining if an element is displayed" section: consistent use of "displayed", "shown", "visible", MUST (Friday, 16 May)
• [Bug 25751] New: 15.2 - use "local end" instead of "client end" (Friday, 16 May)
• [Bug 20860] WebDriver Level 1 (Friday, 16 May)
• [Bug 25749] 15.1.1 - clarify if accept or dismiss should be called (Friday, 16 May)
• [Bug 25749] New: 15.1.1 - clarify if accept or dismiss should be called (Friday, 16 May)
• [Bug 25748] New: 15.1 - Alerts#getText should raise an error if there is no alert (Friday, 16 May)
• [Bug 25746] New: 14.3.3 - how should remote end determine current keyboard locale? (Friday, 16 May)
• [Bug 20860] WebDriver Level 1 (Friday, 16 May)
• [Bug 25182] Should element with 0 clientWidth and clientHeight be considered visible? (Friday, 16 May)
• [Bug 20860] WebDriver Level 1 (Friday, 16 May)
• [Bug 25182] Should element with 0 clientWidth and clientHeight be considered visible? (Friday, 16 May)
• [Bug 25736] New: "Determining if an element is displayed" section: consistent use of "displayed", "shown", "visible", MUST (Friday, 16 May)
• [Bug 25148] Provide ability to change a mutable capability value "on the fly" (Thursday, 15 May)
• [Bug 25148] Provide ability to change a mutable capability value "on the fly" (Thursday, 15 May)
• [Bug 20860] WebDriver Level 1 (Thursday, 15 May)
• [Bug 24974] The distinction between Capabilities and MutableCapabilities is not useful in the context of this spec (Thursday, 15 May)
• [Bug 25728] New: element.scrollIntoView should take implement scrolling animation (Thursday, 15 May)
• [Bug 20860] WebDriver Level 1 (Thursday, 15 May)
• [Bug 25698] 14.3.3 - what is "activeElement"? (Thursday, 15 May)
• [Bug 25698] New: 14.3.3 - what is "activeElement"? (Tuesday, 13 May)
• [Bug 25695] New: 14.3.3 - sendKeys are low level commands (Tuesday, 13 May)
• [Bug 25694] New: 16.2 section isn't needed as it's possible to take screenshot of "html"/"body" (Tuesday, 13 May)
• [Bug 20860] WebDriver Level 1 (Tuesday, 13 May)
• [Bug 25689] DOM-Level-3-Events spec doesn't describe how trusted events should be created (Tuesday, 13 May)
• [Bug 25692] New: It's not told what should happen if element is not supplied (Tuesday, 13 May)
• [Bug 25691] New: WebIDL operations for sending a sequence of MouseAction/TouchAction/MultiAction is not defined (Tuesday, 13 May)
• [Bug 25690] New: 14.2.1 - clickAndHoldAction/moveMouseAction/buttonReleaseAction are not defined (Tuesday, 13 May)
• [Bug 25689] New: DOM-Level-3-Events spec doesn't describe how trusted events should be created (Tuesday, 13 May)
• [Bug 25687] New: Remove "perform" in actions as spec doesn't care about local end API (Tuesday, 13 May)
• [Bug 20860] WebDriver Level 1 (Tuesday, 13 May)
• [Bug 25680] Don't tell what User Agent MUST do (Tuesday, 13 May)
• [Bug 20860] WebDriver Level 1 (Tuesday, 13 May)
• [Bug 25680] Don't tell what User Agent MUST do (Tuesday, 13 May)
• [Bug 25165] 10.3.1 - Webdriver spec doesn't define getElementText (Tuesday, 13 May)
• [Bug 25682] New: MAP does not use an image (Tuesday, 13 May)
• [Bug 20860] WebDriver Level 1 (Tuesday, 13 May)
• [Bug 25681] No "if Javascript is enabled" (Tuesday, 13 May)
• [Bug 25182] Should element with 0 clientWidth and clientHeight be considered visible? (Tuesday, 13 May)
• [Bug 20860] WebDriver Level 1 (Tuesday, 13 May)
• [Bug 25681] New: No "if Javascript is enabled" (Tuesday, 13 May)
• [Bug 25680] New: Don't tell what User Agent MUST do (Tuesday, 13 May)
• [Bug 25678] New: 7.2.1 - switchToWindow doesn't tell that it should change window focus (Tuesday, 13 May)
• [Bug 25676] New: getWindowSize doesn't tell that it returns outerWidth/outerHeight (Tuesday, 13 May)
• [Bug 25165] 10.3.1 - Webdriver spec doesn't define getElementText (Tuesday, 13 May)
• [Bug 25668] New: Nit: Capabilities.has spec can be simplified (Monday, 12 May)
• [Bug 20860] WebDriver Level 1 (Monday, 12 May)
• [Bug 24974] The distinction between Capabilities and MutableCapabilities is not useful in the context of this spec (Monday, 12 May)
• [Bug 20860] WebDriver Level 1 (Monday, 12 May)
• [Bug 25664] Nit: DOMString is never defined (Monday, 12 May)
• [Bug 20860] WebDriver Level 1 (Monday, 12 May)
• [Bug 25059] Web IDL doesn't seem to have "number" type (Monday, 12 May)
• [Bug 25664] New: Nit: DOMString is never defined (Monday, 12 May)
• [Bug 20860] WebDriver Level 1 (Monday, 12 May)
• [Bug 24974] The distinction between Capabilities and MutableCapabilities is not useful in the context of this spec (Monday, 12 May)
• [Bug 20860] WebDriver Level 1 (Monday, 12 May)
• [Bug 24932] The style of Section 4.1 is widely different than the style for the other sections describing commands (Monday, 12 May)
• [Bug 20860] WebDriver Level 1 (Monday, 12 May)
• [Bug 24932] The style of Section 4.1 is widely different than the style for the other sections describing commands (Monday, 12 May)
• [Bug 20860] WebDriver Level 1 (Friday, 9 May)
• [Bug 24978] Section 10.3.1 doesn't specify the exact color format to which implementation should transform style (Friday, 9 May)
• [Bug 20860] WebDriver Level 1 (Friday, 9 May)
• [Bug 24978] Section 10.3.1 doesn't specify the exact color format to which implementation should transform style (Friday, 9 May)
• [Bug 20860] WebDriver Level 1 (Thursday, 8 May)
• [Bug 24978] Section 10.3.1 doesn't specify the exact color format to which implementation should transform style (Thursday, 8 May)
• [Bug 24980] Incorrect link for selectable (Thursday, 8 May)
• [Bug 20860] WebDriver Level 1 (Thursday, 8 May)
• [Bug 24987] Should window resizing and positioning methods take a windowHandle (Thursday, 8 May)
• [Bug 20860] WebDriver Level 1 (Thursday, 8 May)
• [Bug 24990] Defining List of WebElement seems unnecessary (Thursday, 8 May)
• [Bug 20860] WebDriver Level 1 (Tuesday, 6 May)
• [Bug 25063] Incorrect wording in section 7.3.1 (Tuesday, 6 May)
• [Bug 20860] WebDriver Level 1 (Monday, 5 May)
• [Bug 25063] Incorrect wording in section 7.3.1 (Monday, 5 May)
• [Bug 20860] WebDriver Level 1 (Tuesday, 29 April)
• [Bug 23950] New status code "invalid argument" (Tuesday, 29 April)
• [Bug 20860] WebDriver Level 1 (Tuesday, 29 April)
• [Bug 25022] [WebDriver Spec]: Need to add a 'no such session' status code (Tuesday, 29 April)
• [Bug 20860] WebDriver Level 1 (Tuesday, 29 April)
• [Bug 25064] 11.1 - Argument isn't allowed to be null/dictionary/array (Tuesday, 29 April)
• [Bug 20860] WebDriver Level 1 (Tuesday, 29 April)
• [Bug 25063] Incorrect wording in section 7.3.1 (Tuesday, 29 April)
• [Bug 20860] WebDriver Level 1 (Tuesday, 29 April)
• [Bug 25059] Web IDL doesn't seem to have "number" type (Tuesday, 29 April)
• [Bug 25068] Cookie lacks secure and max-age attribute (Monday, 28 April)
• [Bug 20860] WebDriver Level 1 (Monday, 28 April)
• [Bug 20860] WebDriver Level 1 (Monday, 28 April)
• [Bug 25333] 2.1, 2,2 - sessionId/name/value are not marked as nullable (Monday, 28 April)
• [Bug 25490] New: [WebDriver Spec]: Section 5.1.1 Constants - Conservative and Normal have the same behaviour (Monday, 28 April)
• [Bug 20860] WebDriver Level 1 (Wednesday, 23 April)
• [Bug 25184] 10.1 - Use "element has hidden attribute" instead of "element is hidden" (Wednesday, 23 April)
• [Bug 20860] WebDriver Level 1 (Wednesday, 23 April)
• [Bug 24979] The spec is missing section about switching to modal dialog (Wednesday, 23 April)
• [Bug 25165] 10.3.1 - Webdriver spec doesn't define getElementText (Wednesday, 23 April)
• [Bug 20860] WebDriver Level 1 (Tuesday, 22 April)
• [Bug 25182] Should element with 0 clientWidth and clientHeight be considered visible? (Tuesday, 22 April)
• [Bug 20860] WebDriver Level 1 (Tuesday, 22 April)
• [Bug 25183] 10.1 - IMO it's not needed to say that "unless the element is a text node" as element can't be text node (Tuesday, 22 April)
• [Bug 25418] New: [WebDriver Spec]: Should we be pushing the use of vendor prefixes for extensions? (Tuesday, 22 April)
• [Bug 20860] WebDriver Level 1 (Tuesday, 22 April)
• [Bug 25332] 1.4 - keyword "OPTIONALLY" isn't actually used in the spec (Tuesday, 22 April)
• [Bug 20860] WebDriver Level 1 (Saturday, 12 April)
• [Bug 25331] 1.1 - "It is not intended as light bed time reading." (Saturday, 12 April)
• [Bug 25333] New: 2.1, 2,2 - sessionId/name/value are not marked as nullable (Saturday, 12 April)
• [Bug 25332] New: 1,4 - keyword "OPTIONALLY" isn't really used in the specification (Saturday, 12 April)
• [Bug 25331] New: 1.1 - "It is not intended as light bed time reading." (Saturday, 12 April)
• [Bug 25318] New: It's not clear why wait is nullable and optional (Thursday, 10 April)
• [Bug 25317] New: Touch gestures API marks some high-level methods as low level one (Thursday, 10 April)
• [Bug 25308] New: [WebDriver Spec]: 10.4 What language information should be considered for text-transform (Thursday, 10 April)
• [Bug 25307] New: [WebDriver Spec]: 10.4 effective CSS whitespace style needs to be defined (Thursday, 10 April)
• [Bug 25306] New: [WebDriver Spec]:unicode whitespace character class are seen in the current webdriver spec (Thursday, 10 April)
• [Bug 25293] New: Touch gestures API doesn't provide a way to do slow swipe (Tuesday, 8 April)
• [Bug 25286] New: Define whether pixel-based operations occur using device pixels or CSS reference pixels (Tuesday, 8 April)
• [Bug 25285] New: Boolean attributes return null in both situations - if browser returns undefined and if browser returns false (Monday, 7 April)

David Burns

• Re: Fwd: Browser Testing and Tools Working Group Extended (Friday, 27 June)
• Re: WebDriver Test Suite (Thursday, 26 June)
• WebDriver F2F Agenda? (Monday, 16 June)
• Re: Next WebDriver F2F (Wednesday, 14 May)
• Re: Next WebDriver F2F (Tuesday, 13 May)
• [WebDriver] Fwd: [Bug 24974] New: The distinction between Capabilities and MutableCapabilities is not useful in the context of this spec (Thursday, 8 May)
• [WebDriver]: WindowHandles ID when resizing/positioning the window (Tuesday, 29 April)
• Re: [WebDriver Spec]: Should we be pushing the use of vendor prefixes for extensions? (Thursday, 24 April)

James Graham

• Re: WebDriver Test Suite (Friday, 27 June)

Jim Evans

• Re: Next WebDriver F2F (Wednesday, 14 May)
• Re: Next WebDriver F2F (Monday, 12 May)

John Jansen

• RE: WebDriver Test Suite (Friday, 27 June)
• RE: WebDriver Test Suite (Thursday, 26 June)
• WebDriver Test Suite (Thursday, 26 June)
• RE: Next WebDriver F2F (Friday, 13 June)
• Working Group Charter (Wednesday, 23 April)
• [user input] Spec feedback (Thursday, 10 April)

Luke Inman-Semerau

• Re: Next WebDriver F2F (Thursday, 15 May)

Malini Das

• Re: Next WebDriver F2F (Tuesday, 27 May)
• Re: Next WebDriver F2F (Monday, 12 May)
• Re: Controlling the browser environment/settings (Monday, 31 March)

Marc Fisher

• Re: Next WebDriver F2F (Wednesday, 14 May)
• Re: Next WebDriver F2F (Monday, 12 May)

Michael[tm] Smith

• Re: Working Group Charter (Thursday, 24 April)

Seva Lo

• Re: Next WebDriver F2F (Wednesday, 14 May)

Shuotao Gao

• Re: Next WebDriver F2F (Wednesday, 14 May)
• Re: Next WebDriver F2F (Wednesday, 14 May)

Simon Stewart

• Re: WebDriver Test Suite (Friday, 27 June)
• Logistics for WebDriver Face to Face in London (Wednesday, 25 June)
• Re: Next WebDriver F2F (Monday, 23 June)
• Re: WebDriver F2F Agenda? (Monday, 23 June)
• Re: Next WebDriver F2F (Wednesday, 28 May)
• Re: Registration for the WebDriver F2F on July 7-8 (Tuesday, 27 May)
• Re: Next WebDriver F2F (Wednesday, 14 May)
• Re: Next WebDriver F2F (Tuesday, 13 May)
• Re: Next WebDriver F2F (Monday, 12 May)
• Re: [WebDriver]: WindowHandles ID when resizing/positioning the window (Monday, 12 May)

Wilhelm Joys Andersen

• Fwd: Browser Testing and Tools Working Group Extended (Friday, 27 June)
• Re: WebDriver F2F Agenda? (Monday, 23 June)
• Re: Next WebDriver F2F (Tuesday, 27 May)
• Registration for the WebDriver F2F on July 7-8 (Wednesday, 14 May)
• Re: Next WebDriver F2F (Wednesday, 14 May)
• Re: Next WebDriver F2F (Monday, 12 May)
• Next WebDriver F2F (Wednesday, 23 April)

Last message date: Monday, 30 June 2014 22:27:56 UTC