Re: [WebDriver Spec]: Should we be pushing the use of vendor prefixes for extensions?

There is a discussion happening in the bug related to how we could use 
prefixes in the wire protocol that I hope everyone will read and make 
the necessary comments if needed.

David


-------- Original Message --------
Subject:  [Bug 25418] New: [WebDriver Spec]: Should we be pushing the 
use of vendor prefixes for extensions?
Resent-Date:  Tue, 22 Apr 2014 22:49:01 +0000
Resent-From:  public-browser-tools-testing@w3.org
Date:  Tue, 22 Apr 2014 22:48:53 +0000
From:  bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
To:  public-browser-tools-testing@w3.org



https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=25418

             Bug ID: 25418
            Summary: [WebDriver Spec]: Should we be pushing the use of
                     vendor prefixes for extensions?
            Product: Browser Test/Tools WG
            Version: unspecified
           Hardware: PC
                URL: https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/webdriver/raw-file/default/webd
                     river-spec.html#extending-the-protocol
                 OS: Linux
             Status: NEW
           Severity: normal
           Priority: P2
          Component: WebDriver
           Assignee: public-browser-tools-testing@w3.org
           Reporter: fisherii@google.com
         QA Contact: public-browser-tools-testing@w3.org
                 CC: mike@w3.org
             Blocks: 20860

With both Chrome
(http://www.chromium.org/blink/developer-faq#TOC-Will-we-see-a--chrome--vendor-prefix-now-)
and Firefox
(http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2012OctDec/0731.html)
moving away from vendor prefixes, should we being encouraging the use of these
prefixes in the wire protocol?

Also the referenced list of extensions
(http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/syndata.html#vendor-keywords) seems noticeable
sparse.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.