[Bug 25418] New: [WebDriver Spec]: Should we be pushing the use of vendor prefixes for extensions?

https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=25418

            Bug ID: 25418
           Summary: [WebDriver Spec]: Should we be pushing the use of
                    vendor prefixes for extensions?
           Product: Browser Test/Tools WG
           Version: unspecified
          Hardware: PC
               URL: https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/webdriver/raw-file/default/webd
                    river-spec.html#extending-the-protocol
                OS: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: WebDriver
          Assignee: public-browser-tools-testing@w3.org
          Reporter: fisherii@google.com
        QA Contact: public-browser-tools-testing@w3.org
                CC: mike@w3.org
            Blocks: 20860

With both Chrome
(http://www.chromium.org/blink/developer-faq#TOC-Will-we-see-a--chrome--vendor-prefix-now-)
and Firefox
(http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2012OctDec/0731.html)
moving away from vendor prefixes, should we being encouraging the use of these
prefixes in the wire protocol?

Also the referenced list of extensions
(http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/syndata.html#vendor-keywords) seems noticeable
sparse.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.

Received on Tuesday, 22 April 2014 22:49:00 UTC