https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=25418 Bug ID: 25418 Summary: [WebDriver Spec]: Should we be pushing the use of vendor prefixes for extensions? Product: Browser Test/Tools WG Version: unspecified Hardware: PC URL: https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/webdriver/raw-file/default/webd river-spec.html#extending-the-protocol OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: WebDriver Assignee: public-browser-tools-testing@w3.org Reporter: fisherii@google.com QA Contact: public-browser-tools-testing@w3.org CC: mike@w3.org Blocks: 20860 With both Chrome (http://www.chromium.org/blink/developer-faq#TOC-Will-we-see-a--chrome--vendor-prefix-now-) and Firefox (http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2012OctDec/0731.html) moving away from vendor prefixes, should we being encouraging the use of these prefixes in the wire protocol? Also the referenced list of extensions (http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/syndata.html#vendor-keywords) seems noticeable sparse. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.Received on Tuesday, 22 April 2014 22:49:00 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:09:50 UTC