[Bug 6120] New: Reconsider blockDefault=#all
[Bug 5075] use of "ad" as an ID vs. ad blockers
[Bug 4940] Explanation of terminology change regarding ur-type definition is a bit confusing
[Bug 5476] xsi:schemaLocation should be a hint, should be MAY not SHOULD
[Bug 5476] xsi:schemaLocation should be a hint, should be MAY not SHOULD
[Bug 5476] xsi:schemaLocation should be a hint, should be MAY not SHOULD
Typo in current XSDCD WD?
Fw: request for document review: XSD 1.1 by the SOAP-JMS Binding Working Group
[Bug 5732] Provide a simplified syntax for XSD 1.1
[Bug 5732] Provide a simplified syntax for XSD 1.1
[Bug 5732] Provide a simplified syntax for XSD 1.1
[Bug 5046] <xsd:attributeGroup example 2 is incorrect
[Bug 6089] New: Revise anyURI to use RFCs 3986 and 3987
[Bug 6056] New: Make identity constraints propagate through substitution groups?
- [Bug 6056] Make identity constraints propagate through substitution groups?
- [Bug 6056] Make identity constraints propagate through substitution groups?
W3C XSD V1.1 schema and OASIS CAM templates comment.
[Bug 4642] Terminology: zone offset versus time zone
[Bug 6048] New: Clarify which times the implementation limits apply to
- [Bug 6048] Clarify which times the implementation limits apply to
- [Bug 6048] Clarify which types the implementation limits apply to
[Bug 6047] New: Minimum implementation limit for decimal requires infinite precision - did you mean that?
- [Bug 6047] Minimum implementation limit for decimal requires infinite precision - did you mean that?
[Bug 6046] New: Why does range of legal time zone offsets exceed actual usage?
- [Bug 6046] Why does range of legal time zone offsets exceed actual usage?
- [Bug 6046] Why does range of legal time zone offsets exceed actual usage?
- [Bug 6046] Why does range of legal time zone offsets exceed actual usage?
- [Bug 6046] Why does range of legal time zone offsets exceed actual usage?
- [Bug 6046] Why does range of legal time zone offsets exceed actual usage?
[Bug 6045] New: Single timeline value space for dateTime -- compatible or no?
- [Bug 6045] Single timeline value space for dateTime -- compatible or no?
- [Bug 6045] Single timeline value space for dateTime -- compatible or no?
- [Bug 6045] Single timeline value space for dateTime -- compatible or no?
[Bug 6044] New: Revise equality of dateTime values without timezone
- [Bug 6044] Revise equality of dateTime values without timezone
- [Bug 6044] Revise equality of dateTime values without timezone
- [Bug 6044] Revise equality of dateTime values without timezone
- [Bug 6044] Revise equality of dateTime values without timezone
- [Bug 6044] Revise equality of dateTime values without timezone
[Bug 6043] New: Pls define a restriction of dateTime with required timezones
- [Bug 6043] Pls define a restriction of dateTime with required timezones
- [Bug 6043] Pls define a restriction of dateTime with required timezones
- [Bug 6043] Pls define a restriction of dateTime with required timezones
- [Bug 6043] Pls define a restriction of dateTime with required timezones
[Bug 6031] New: Oops! in algorithm of precisionDecimalCanonicalMap
[Bug 3248] Numeric precision
[Bug 3248] Numeric precision
OWL WG comments on XML Schema 1.1 Datatypes
[Bug 6021] New: Stylesheet for xs:override
- [Bug 6021] Stylesheet for xs:override
- [Bug 6021] Stylesheet for xs:override
- [Bug 6021] Stylesheet for xs:override
[Bug 6015] New: [schema11] valid (and its derivations) vs assessment as used in text
[Bug 6014] New: [schema11] normative text problems
[Bug 6013] New: [schema11] new examples needed
[Bug 6012] New: [schema11] inconsistencies in text
[Bug 6011] New: [schema11] base URI comments
[Bug 6010] New: [schema11] priority feedback responses
- [Bug 6010] [schema11] priority feedback responses
- [Bug 6010] [schema11] priority feedback responses
- [Bug 6010] [schema11] priority feedback responses
- [Bug 6010] [schema11] priority feedback responses
- [Bug 6010] [schema11] priority feedback responses
- [Bug 6010] [schema11] priority feedback responses
[Bug 6009] New: [schema11] unclear passages
[Bug 6008] New: [schema11] small presumably editorial bugs
[Bug 4908] 'The schema corresponding to a schema document' and QName resolution
[Bug 5003] Applicability of <alternative> element to xml:lang
[Bug 5950] New: References update
[Bug 5949] New: Terminology: Timezone vs. zone offset
- [Bug 5949] Terminology: Timezone vs. zone offset
- [Bug 5949] Terminology: Timezone vs. zone offset
- [Bug 5949] Terminology: Timezone vs. zone offset
[Bug 5948] New: Reference to Unicode Database
[Bug 5947] New: Support for XML 1.1
[Bug 3079] RFC3066 ref
[Bug 5943] New: ComplexContent extending SimpleContent
[Bug 5940] New: Element Declarations Consistent
- [Bug 5940] Element Declarations Consistent
- [Bug 5940] Element Declarations Consistent
- [Bug 5940] Element Declarations Consistent
[Bug 5938] New: Spurious diff markup in 3.10.6.2
[Bug 5934] New: Typo concerning <simpleContent mixed="true">
- [Bug 5934] Typo concerning <simpleContent mixed="true">
- [Bug 5934] Typo concerning <simpleContent mixed="true">
[Bug 5932] New: Open content with empty content models
[Bug 5931] New: Is xs:openContent/xs:any optional?
[Bug 5930] New: defaultOpenContent in the S4SD
- [Bug 5930] defaultOpenContent and override in the S4SD
- [Bug 5930] defaultOpenContent in the S4SD
- [Bug 5930] defaultOpenContent in the S4SD
[Bug 5929] New: Facets in the schema for schema documents
[Bug 5928] New: Content model for xs:schema
[Bug 5003] Applicability of <alternative> element to xml:lang
[Bug 5918] New: Top level declarations
[Bug 5917] New: Typo in 3.1.1
[Bug 5916] New: Obsolete editorial note
[Bug 5907] New: Problem with BNF for type alternatives
[Bug 5905] New: vc:typeAvailable and vc:typeUnavailable
- [Bug 5905] vc:typeAvailable and vc:typeUnavailable
- [Bug 5905] vc:typeAvailable and vc:typeUnavailable
- [Bug 5905] vc:typeAvailable and vc:typeUnavailable
- [Bug 5905] vc:typeAvailable and vc:typeUnavailable
[Bug 5906] New: Problem in definition of <restriction> in <complexType>::<simpleContent>
[Bug 5904] New: Unknown attributes in vc namespace
[Bug 4887] Broken link to IEEE 754-1985
itemType case error in XML Schema for Schema 1.0
[Bug 5896] New: Description of particles and terms in 2.2.3.2 confusing
Description of particles and terms in 2.2.3.2 confusing
Include earlier informal description of annotated component
[XSCD] any implementations of XML Schema: Component Designators?
XML Schema Part 0: Primer Second Edition - Errata Corrige
[Bug 5818] Unicode Database: shifting sands
[Bug 5880] New: internationalization of tag names
[Bug 5779] QName resolution and xs:import
[Bug 5800] Possibly revise list of required infoset properties
[Bug 5782] Definition of simpleType.{final}
[Bug 4450] indistinguishable annotations?
[Bug 5878] New: need errata documents against 1.0 2E
[Bug 5877] New: need errata documents against 1.0 2E
[Bug 5875] New: longName for elements, attributes and model groups
- [Bug 5875] longName for elements, attributes and model groups
- [Bug 5875] longName for elements, attributes and model groups
[Bug 5372] Define bridge functions
[Bug 3678] [SCD] SCDs for attribute uses and particles
[Bug 2659] lc-2: simple barenames for schema component designators
[Bug 3046] RQ-23 First class objects (first-class-obj)
[Bug 3855] Use of "Default Axis" versus XPath
[Bug 3680] [SCD] Path abbreviations confusing
[Bug 5373] [SCD] Define accessors
[Bug 2661] lc-4: LC comments
[Bug 4449] How do you write an empty namespace prefix?
[Bug 5375] [SCD] Regularize the grammar
[Bug 5376] [SCD] Richer extension story
[Bug 3684] [SCD] // confusing
[Bug 5377] Requirement for metadata querying
[Bug 5371] [SCD] Eliminate notion of 'elided steps'
[Bug 3685] [SCD] (Editorial) Origanize by axes
3.2.17 of Part 2 and RFCs 3986/3987
[Bug 5862] New: Please retain redefine as well as override
[Bug 5861] New: Elements with complex types should be allowed to have assertions
- [Bug 5861] Elements with complex types should be allowed to have assertions
- [Bug 5861] Elements with complex types should be allowed to have assertions
- [Bug 5861] Elements with complex types should be allowed to have assertions
markup editorial: <div class="p">
Re: ISSUE-126 (Revisit Datatypes): A new proposal for the real <-> float <-> double conundrum
- Re: ISSUE-126 (Revisit Datatypes): A new proposal for the real <-> float <-> double conundrum
- Re: ISSUE-126 (Revisit Datatypes): A new proposal for the real <-> float <-> double conundrum
- RE: ISSUE-126 (Revisit Datatypes): A new proposal for the real <-> float <-> double conundrum