www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org from July to September 2008 by author

Alan Ruttenberg

• Re: ISSUE-126 (Revisit Datatypes): A new proposal for the real <-> float <-> double conundrum (Saturday, 5 July)
• Re: ISSUE-126 (Revisit Datatypes): A new proposal for the real <-> float <-> double conundrum (Friday, 4 July)
• Re: Question about number types (Friday, 4 July)
• Re: Question about number types (Thursday, 3 July)
• Re: Question about number types (Thursday, 3 July)
• Question about number types (Wednesday, 2 July)

Bijan Parsia

• Re: Question about number types (Friday, 4 July)
• Re: Question about number types (Friday, 4 July)

bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org

• [Bug 6043] Pls define a restriction of dateTime with required timezones (Monday, 29 September)
• [Bug 5948] Reference to Unicode Database (Monday, 29 September)
• [Bug 6120] New: Reconsider blockDefault=#all (Friday, 26 September)
• [Bug 5928] Content model for xs:schema (Friday, 26 September)
• [Bug 5075] use of "ad" as an ID vs. ad blockers (Friday, 26 September)
• [Bug 4940] Explanation of terminology change regarding ur-type definition is a bit confusing (Friday, 26 September)
• [Bug 5476] xsi:schemaLocation should be a hint, should be MAY not SHOULD (Thursday, 25 September)
• [Bug 6044] Revise equality of dateTime values without timezone (Wednesday, 24 September)
• [Bug 6044] Revise equality of dateTime values without timezone (Wednesday, 24 September)
• [Bug 6048] Clarify which types the implementation limits apply to (Wednesday, 24 September)
• [Bug 6044] Revise equality of dateTime values without timezone (Wednesday, 24 September)
• [Bug 6046] Why does range of legal time zone offsets exceed actual usage? (Wednesday, 24 September)
• [Bug 6045] Single timeline value space for dateTime -- compatible or no? (Wednesday, 24 September)
• [Bug 6044] Revise equality of dateTime values without timezone (Wednesday, 24 September)
• [Bug 6043] Pls define a restriction of dateTime with required timezones (Wednesday, 24 September)
• [Bug 5476] xsi:schemaLocation should be a hint, should be MAY not SHOULD (Tuesday, 23 September)
• [Bug 5476] xsi:schemaLocation should be a hint, should be MAY not SHOULD (Tuesday, 23 September)
• [Bug 5732] Provide a simplified syntax for XSD 1.1 (Monday, 22 September)
• [Bug 5732] Provide a simplified syntax for XSD 1.1 (Saturday, 20 September)
• [Bug 5732] Provide a simplified syntax for XSD 1.1 (Friday, 19 September)
• [Bug 6056] Make identity constraints propagate through substitution groups? (Thursday, 18 September)
• [Bug 6056] Make identity constraints propagate through substitution groups? (Thursday, 18 September)
• [Bug 5947] Support for XML 1.1 (Wednesday, 17 September)
• [Bug 5046] <xsd:attributeGroup example 2 is incorrect (Tuesday, 16 September)
• [Bug 6089] Revise anyURI to use RFCs 3986 and 3987 (Tuesday, 16 September)
• [Bug 6089] New: Revise anyURI to use RFCs 3986 and 3987 (Tuesday, 16 September)
• [Bug 6021] Stylesheet for xs:override (Friday, 12 September)
• [Bug 6046] Why does range of legal time zone offsets exceed actual usage? (Friday, 12 September)
• [Bug 6045] Single timeline value space for dateTime -- compatible or no? (Friday, 12 September)
• [Bug 6031] Oops! in algorithm of precisionDecimalCanonicalMap (Friday, 12 September)
• [Bug 6056] New: Make identity constraints propagate through substitution groups? (Friday, 12 September)
• [Bug 6015] [schema11] valid (and its derivations) vs assessment as used in text (Thursday, 11 September)
• [Bug 6014] [schema11] normative text problems (Thursday, 11 September)
• [Bug 6013] [schema11] new examples needed (Thursday, 11 September)
• [Bug 6012] [schema11] inconsistencies in text (Thursday, 11 September)
• [Bug 6011] [schema11] base URI comments (Thursday, 11 September)
• [Bug 6010] [schema11] priority feedback responses (Thursday, 11 September)
• [Bug 6009] [schema11] unclear passages (Thursday, 11 September)
• [Bug 5949] Terminology: Timezone vs. zone offset (Wednesday, 10 September)
• [Bug 5905] vc:typeAvailable and vc:typeUnavailable (Tuesday, 9 September)
• [Bug 5934] Typo concerning <simpleContent mixed="true"> (Tuesday, 9 September)
• [Bug 5930] defaultOpenContent in the S4SD (Tuesday, 9 September)
• [Bug 5905] vc:typeAvailable and vc:typeUnavailable (Tuesday, 9 September)
• [Bug 5904] Unknown attributes in vc namespace (Tuesday, 9 September)
• [Bug 5949] Terminology: Timezone vs. zone offset (Tuesday, 9 September)
• [Bug 4642] Terminology: zone offset versus time zone (Tuesday, 9 September)
• [Bug 5861] Elements with complex types should be allowed to have assertions (Tuesday, 9 September)
• [Bug 6046] Why does range of legal time zone offsets exceed actual usage? (Tuesday, 9 September)
• [Bug 6046] Why does range of legal time zone offsets exceed actual usage? (Tuesday, 9 September)
• [Bug 6043] Pls define a restriction of dateTime with required timezones (Tuesday, 9 September)
• [Bug 6048] Clarify which times the implementation limits apply to (Tuesday, 9 September)
• [Bug 6047] Minimum implementation limit for decimal requires infinite precision - did you mean that? (Tuesday, 9 September)
• [Bug 6046] Why does range of legal time zone offsets exceed actual usage? (Tuesday, 9 September)
• [Bug 6045] Single timeline value space for dateTime -- compatible or no? (Tuesday, 9 September)
• [Bug 6044] Revise equality of dateTime values without timezone (Tuesday, 9 September)
• [Bug 6043] Pls define a restriction of dateTime with required timezones (Tuesday, 9 September)
• [Bug 6048] New: Clarify which times the implementation limits apply to (Tuesday, 9 September)
• [Bug 6047] New: Minimum implementation limit for decimal requires infinite precision - did you mean that? (Tuesday, 9 September)
• [Bug 6046] New: Why does range of legal time zone offsets exceed actual usage? (Tuesday, 9 September)
• [Bug 6045] New: Single timeline value space for dateTime -- compatible or no? (Tuesday, 9 September)
• [Bug 6044] New: Revise equality of dateTime values without timezone (Tuesday, 9 September)
• [Bug 6043] New: Pls define a restriction of dateTime with required timezones (Tuesday, 9 September)
• [Bug 5861] Elements with complex types should be allowed to have assertions (Tuesday, 9 September)
• [Bug 5861] Elements with complex types should be allowed to have assertions (Tuesday, 9 September)
• [Bug 6014] [schema11] normative text problems (Monday, 8 September)
• [Bug 6012] [schema11] inconsistencies in text (Monday, 8 September)
• [Bug 6031] New: Oops! in algorithm of precisionDecimalCanonicalMap (Saturday, 6 September)
• [Bug 3248] Numeric precision (Saturday, 6 September)
• [Bug 3248] Numeric precision (Friday, 5 September)
• [Bug 5947] Support for XML 1.1 (Friday, 5 September)
• [Bug 5948] Reference to Unicode Database (Friday, 5 September)
• [Bug 6010] [schema11] priority feedback responses (Wednesday, 3 September)
• [Bug 6010] [schema11] priority feedback responses (Wednesday, 3 September)
• [Bug 6021] Stylesheet for xs:override (Wednesday, 3 September)
• [Bug 6021] Stylesheet for xs:override (Wednesday, 3 September)
• [Bug 6010] [schema11] priority feedback responses (Tuesday, 2 September)
• [Bug 6021] New: Stylesheet for xs:override (Tuesday, 2 September)
• [Bug 6010] [schema11] priority feedback responses (Tuesday, 2 September)
• [Bug 6010] [schema11] priority feedback responses (Tuesday, 2 September)
• [Bug 6015] New: [schema11] valid (and its derivations) vs assessment as used in text (Tuesday, 2 September)
• [Bug 6014] New: [schema11] normative text problems (Tuesday, 2 September)
• [Bug 6013] New: [schema11] new examples needed (Tuesday, 2 September)
• [Bug 6012] New: [schema11] inconsistencies in text (Tuesday, 2 September)
• [Bug 6011] New: [schema11] base URI comments (Tuesday, 2 September)
• [Bug 6010] New: [schema11] priority feedback responses (Tuesday, 2 September)
• [Bug 6009] New: [schema11] unclear passages (Tuesday, 2 September)
• [Bug 6008] New: [schema11] small presumably editorial bugs (Tuesday, 2 September)
• [Bug 4908] 'The schema corresponding to a schema document' and QName resolution (Tuesday, 2 September)
• [Bug 5930] defaultOpenContent in the S4SD (Friday, 29 August)
• [Bug 5940] Element Declarations Consistent (Tuesday, 26 August)
• [Bug 5949] Terminology: Timezone vs. zone offset (Monday, 18 August)
• [Bug 5940] Element Declarations Consistent (Monday, 18 August)
• [Bug 5934] Typo concerning <simpleContent mixed="true"> (Monday, 18 August)
• [Bug 5930] defaultOpenContent and override in the S4SD (Monday, 18 August)
• [Bug 5905] vc:typeAvailable and vc:typeUnavailable (Monday, 18 August)
• [Bug 5003] Applicability of <alternative> element to xml:lang (Monday, 11 August)
• [Bug 5950] New: References update (Monday, 11 August)
• [Bug 5949] New: Terminology: Timezone vs. zone offset (Monday, 11 August)
• [Bug 5948] New: Reference to Unicode Database (Monday, 11 August)
• [Bug 5947] New: Support for XML 1.1 (Monday, 11 August)
• [Bug 5905] vc:typeAvailable and vc:typeUnavailable (Friday, 8 August)
• [Bug 5904] Unknown attributes in vc namespace (Friday, 8 August)
• [Bug 3079] RFC3066 ref (Friday, 8 August)
• [Bug 5943] New: ComplexContent extending SimpleContent (Thursday, 7 August)
• [Bug 5940] Element Declarations Consistent (Thursday, 7 August)
• [Bug 5940] New: Element Declarations Consistent (Thursday, 7 August)
• [Bug 5938] New: Spurious diff markup in 3.10.6.2 (Thursday, 7 August)
• [Bug 5934] New: Typo concerning <simpleContent mixed="true"> (Wednesday, 6 August)
• [Bug 5932] Open content with empty content models (Wednesday, 6 August)
• [Bug 5932] New: Open content with empty content models (Wednesday, 6 August)
• [Bug 5931] Is xs:openContent/xs:any optional? (Tuesday, 5 August)
• [Bug 5931] New: Is xs:openContent/xs:any optional? (Tuesday, 5 August)
• [Bug 5930] New: defaultOpenContent in the S4SD (Tuesday, 5 August)
• [Bug 5929] New: Facets in the schema for schema documents (Tuesday, 5 August)
• [Bug 5928] New: Content model for xs:schema (Tuesday, 5 August)
• [Bug 5875] longName for elements, attributes and model groups (Monday, 4 August)
• [Bug 5875] longName for elements, attributes and model groups (Monday, 4 August)
• [Bug 5880] internationalization of tag names (Monday, 4 August)
• [Bug 5862] Please retain redefine as well as override (Monday, 4 August)
• [Bug 5003] Applicability of <alternative> element to xml:lang (Monday, 4 August)
• [Bug 5918] New: Top level declarations (Wednesday, 30 July)
• [Bug 5917] New: Typo in 3.1.1 (Wednesday, 30 July)
• [Bug 5916] New: Obsolete editorial note (Wednesday, 30 July)
• [Bug 5906] Problem in definition of <restriction> in <complexType>::<simpleContent> (Tuesday, 29 July)
• [Bug 5907] New: Problem with BNF for type alternatives (Tuesday, 29 July)
• [Bug 5905] New: vc:typeAvailable and vc:typeUnavailable (Tuesday, 29 July)
• [Bug 5906] New: Problem in definition of <restriction> in <complexType>::<simpleContent> (Tuesday, 29 July)
• [Bug 5904] New: Unknown attributes in vc namespace (Tuesday, 29 July)
• [Bug 4887] Broken link to IEEE 754-1985 (Tuesday, 29 July)
• [Bug 5896] New: Description of particles and terms in 2.2.3.2 confusing (Thursday, 24 July)
• [Bug 5818] Unicode Database: shifting sands (Friday, 18 July)
• [Bug 5880] New: internationalization of tag names (Friday, 18 July)
• [Bug 5779] QName resolution and xs:import (Friday, 18 July)
• [Bug 5800] Possibly revise list of required infoset properties (Friday, 18 July)
• [Bug 5782] Definition of simpleType.{final} (Friday, 18 July)
• [Bug 4450] indistinguishable annotations? (Friday, 18 July)
• [Bug 5878] need errata documents against 1.0 2E (Friday, 18 July)
• [Bug 5877] need errata documents against 1.0 2E (Friday, 18 July)
• [Bug 5878] New: need errata documents against 1.0 2E (Friday, 18 July)
• [Bug 5877] New: need errata documents against 1.0 2E (Friday, 18 July)
• [Bug 5875] New: longName for elements, attributes and model groups (Friday, 18 July)
• [Bug 5372] Define bridge functions (Tuesday, 15 July)
• [Bug 3678] [SCD] SCDs for attribute uses and particles (Tuesday, 15 July)
• [Bug 2659] lc-2: simple barenames for schema component designators (Tuesday, 15 July)
• [Bug 3046] RQ-23 First class objects (first-class-obj) (Tuesday, 15 July)
• [Bug 3855] Use of "Default Axis" versus XPath (Tuesday, 15 July)
• [Bug 3680] [SCD] Path abbreviations confusing (Tuesday, 15 July)
• [Bug 5373] [SCD] Define accessors (Tuesday, 15 July)
• [Bug 2661] lc-4: LC comments (Tuesday, 15 July)
• [Bug 4449] How do you write an empty namespace prefix? (Tuesday, 15 July)
• [Bug 5375] [SCD] Regularize the grammar (Tuesday, 15 July)
• [Bug 5376] [SCD] Richer extension story (Tuesday, 15 July)
• [Bug 3684] [SCD] // confusing (Tuesday, 15 July)
• [Bug 5377] Requirement for metadata querying (Tuesday, 15 July)
• [Bug 5371] [SCD] Eliminate notion of 'elided steps' (Tuesday, 15 July)
• [Bug 3685] [SCD] (Editorial) Origanize by axes (Tuesday, 15 July)
• [Bug 5862] New: Please retain redefine as well as override (Sunday, 13 July)
• [Bug 5861] New: Elements with complex types should be allowed to have assertions (Sunday, 13 July)

C. M. Sperberg-McQueen

• Re: OWL WG comments on XML Schema 1.1 Datatypes (Thursday, 25 September)
• Re: OWL WG comments on XML Schema 1.1 Datatypes (Tuesday, 9 September)
• Re: [Bug 5862] Please retain redefine as well as override (Tuesday, 5 August)
• Re: Include earlier informal description of annotated component (Wednesday, 23 July)
• Re: Description of particles and terms in 2.2.3.2 confusing (Wednesday, 23 July)
• Re: markup editorial: <div class="p"> (Tuesday, 8 July)
• Re: Question about number types (Friday, 4 July)
• Re: Question about number types (Friday, 4 July)
• Re: Question about number types (Friday, 4 July)

C.M.Sperberg-McQueen

• Re: Question about number types (Friday, 4 July)

Dave Peterson

• RE: ISSUE-126 (Revisit Datatypes): A new proposal for the real <-> float <-> double conundrum (Wednesday, 9 July)
• Re: ISSUE-126 (Revisit Datatypes): A new proposal for the real <-> float <-> double conundrum (Tuesday, 8 July)
• Re: ISSUE-126 (Revisit Datatypes): A new proposal for the real <-> float <-> double conundrum (Monday, 7 July)
• RE: ISSUE-126 (Revisit Datatypes): A new proposal for the real <-> float <-> double conundrum (Sunday, 6 July)
• RE: ISSUE-126 (Revisit Datatypes): A new proposal for the real <-> float <-> double conundrum (Sunday, 6 July)
• Re: ISSUE-126 (Revisit Datatypes): A new proposal for the real <-> float <-> double conundrum (Saturday, 5 July)
• Re: Question about number types (Saturday, 5 July)
• Re: Question about number types (Friday, 4 July)
• Re: Question about number types (Friday, 4 July)
• Re: Question about number types (Wednesday, 2 July)

David RR Webber \(XML\)

• W3C XSD V1.1 schema and OASIS CAM templates comment. (Monday, 1 September)

Elliotte Harold

• Re: markup editorial: <div class="p"> (Tuesday, 8 July)
• markup editorial: <div class="p"> (Monday, 7 July)

Florent Georges

• Typo in current XSDCD WD? (Tuesday, 23 September)

Mark Hansen

• [XSCD] any implementations of XML Schema: Component Designators? (Monday, 21 July)

Mark Phillips

• Fw: request for document review: XSD 1.1 by the SOAP-JMS Binding Working Group (Monday, 22 September)

Mary Holstege

• Re: Typo in current XSDCD WD? (Tuesday, 23 September)

Michael Kay

• RE: ISSUE-126 (Revisit Datatypes): A new proposal for the real <-> float <-> double conundrum (Wednesday, 9 July)
• RE: ISSUE-126 (Revisit Datatypes): A new proposal for the real <-> float <-> double conundrum (Tuesday, 8 July)
• RE: markup editorial: <div class="p"> (Tuesday, 8 July)
• RE: ISSUE-126 (Revisit Datatypes): A new proposal for the real <-> float <-> double conundrum (Sunday, 6 July)
• RE: ISSUE-126 (Revisit Datatypes): A new proposal for the real <-> float <-> double conundrum (Saturday, 5 July)
• RE: Question about number types (Friday, 4 July)
• RE: Question about number types (Thursday, 3 July)
• RE: Question about number types (Wednesday, 2 July)

MURATA Makoto (FAMILY Given)

• 3.2.17 of Part 2 and RFCs 3986/3987 (Tuesday, 15 July)

noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com

• Re: [Bug 5862] Please retain redefine as well as override (Monday, 4 August)

Paul \

• Re: ISSUE-126 (Revisit Datatypes): A new proposal for the real <-> float <-> double conundrum (Monday, 7 July)

Pete Cordell

• Description of particles and terms in 2.2.3.2 confusing (Wednesday, 23 July)
• Include earlier informal description of annotated component (Wednesday, 23 July)
• Re: ISSUE-126 (Revisit Datatypes): A new proposal for the real <-> float <-> double conundrum (Wednesday, 9 July)

Peter F. Patel-Schneider

• Re: OWL WG comments on XML Schema 1.1 Datatypes (Wednesday, 24 September)
• OWL WG comments on XML Schema 1.1 Datatypes (Friday, 5 September)

Richard H. McCullough

• Re: ISSUE-126 (Revisit Datatypes): A new proposal for the real <-> float <-> double conundrum (Tuesday, 8 July)
• Re: ISSUE-126 (Revisit Datatypes): A new proposal for the real <-> float <-> double conundrum (Monday, 7 July)
• Re: ISSUE-126 (Revisit Datatypes): A new proposal for the real <-> float <-> double conundrum (Sunday, 6 July)

Satterfield, William J CTR USAF HQ AF GCIC/RINIV

• itemType case error in XML Schema for Schema 1.0 (Monday, 21 July)

Sergio de Gioia

• XML Schema Part 0: Primer Second Edition - Errata Corrige (Wednesday, 16 July)

Last message date: Monday, 29 September 2008 15:12:32 UTC