Re: Include earlier informal description of annotated component from C. M. Sperberg-McQueen on 2008-07-23 (www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org from July to September 2008)

From: C. M. Sperberg-McQueen <cmsmcq@acm.org>
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2008 17:46:29 -0600
To: Pete Cordell <petexmldev@codalogic.com>
Cc: "C. M. Sperberg-McQueen" <cmsmcq@acm.org>, <www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org>
Message-Id: <FC2D88FD-32B8-4A4F-B137-3CEC1235FB76@acm.org>

On 23 Jul 2008, at 04:57 , Pete Cordell wrote:

>
> 2.2.3.2 refers to annotated component which hasn't been introduced  
> by this time.
>
> It's proposed that after the definition of "Component" in 2.2 the  
> following text be added:
>
> "Some types of ·Component· may have ·Annotations·.  ·Annotations·  
> are additional information for human and/or mechanical consumers  
> whose interpretation is not defined in this specification.  Such  
> components are called ·Annotated Components·."
>

Thank you!  I've put this into an in-process editorial proposal.

Michael Sperberg-McQueen

Received on Thursday, 24 July 2008 02:39:17 UTC