Re: OWL WG comments on XML Schema 1.1 Datatypes

I've finally added myself to bugzilla, and added to the comments on
several of the "bugs".

peter




From: "C. M. Sperberg-McQueen" <cmsmcq@acm.org>
Subject: Re: OWL WG comments on XML Schema 1.1 Datatypes
Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2008 20:24:16 -0600

> On 5 Sep 2008, at 06:44 , Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote:
> 
> >
> > The W3C OWL WG is planning on using datatypes from XML Schema 1.1
> > Datatypes, currently in last call [2]. The WG views most of the changes
> > made for XML Schema 1.1 Datatypes to be beneficial, and thus supports
> > the transition of the last call specification towards recommendation,
> > which a few exceptions, detailed below.
> 
> Thank you very much for your comments, and for their clarity.
> 
> In the interests of tracking them, I have made Bugzilla entries for
> the six comments in your note; they are at
> 
>    http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=6043
>    http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=6044
>    http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=6045
>    http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=6046
>    http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=6047
>    http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=6048
> 
> It would be very helpful if you, in your role as the transmitter of
> the OWL WG's comments, were to register with the W3C's public
> Bugzilla instance and add yourself (or some appropriate OWL WG
> mailing list) to the CC list on these six issues; you will then be
> notified automatically when the XML Schema WG updates the status
> of the issues.  I would do it for you, but some people prefer to have
> Bugzilla mail go to special-purpose mail addresses to avoid cluttering
> their main inbox, so I have not done so in this case.
> 
> (If you have any difficulties with the Bugzilla interface, the information
> at http://www.w3.org/XML/2006/01/public-bugzilla.html may be helpful;
> if that fails, your staff contact or I will be able to help.)
> 
> I expect the XML Schema WG to take these issues up in the coming weeks;
> you will hear back from us with the results in due course.
> 
> Please convey to the OWL Working Group the thanks of the XML Schema Working
> Group for your reading of the XSD 1.1 Datatypes spec, and for your
> comments.
> 
> --C. M. Sperberg-McQueen
>    for the XML Schema WG
>