W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org > July to September 2008

[Bug 4940] Explanation of terminology change regarding ur-type definition is a bit confusing

From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2008 16:05:39 +0000
To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1KjFp5-00071V-Vf@wiggum.w3.org>

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4940


David Ezell <David_E3@VERIFONE.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |David_E3@VERIFONE.com
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED




--- Comment #1 from David Ezell <David_E3@VERIFONE.com>  2008-09-26 16:05:39 ---
The WG believes that the problem has been addressed already.  The only example
of the term 'ur-type' still extant is where the spec. mentions that we used to
use that term.


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Friday, 26 September 2008 16:06:18 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 26 September 2008 16:06:20 GMT