http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=6043 --- Comment #4 from Dave Peterson <davep@iit.edu> 2008-09-29 15:11:58 --- (In reply to comment #3) > Anyway, is there an expected timeline for a decision on this? To get the resolution into bugzilla, I'll note from the minutes of the WG call of 2008-09-19, http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-xml-schema-ig/2008Sep/0025.html , a proposal to "instruct the editors to define (a) a new facet for specifying that the timezone is allowed, required, or forbidden, and (b) one new datatype (not two) derived from dateTime, with a required timezone." was adopted. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.Received on Monday, 29 September 2008 15:12:32 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Sunday, 6 December 2009 18:13:16 GMT