http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=6043 Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pfps@research.bell-labs.com --- Comment #3 from Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com> 2008-09-24 20:09:07 --- I don't think that I can come up with rationales for the various 16 types. The OWL WG request is only to provide a well-known name for the particular datatype that will be part of the the OWL spec. If the XML Schema WG decides not to add this datatype, I expect that the OWL WG will define its own datatype, which probably wouldn't quite be the same as the datatype defined from xsd:dateTime by means of a pattern. Perhaps an easier request would be to instead have a facet that explicitly requires/forbids timezone. Anyway, is there an expected timeline for a decision on this? -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.Received on Wednesday, 24 September 2008 20:09:47 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Sunday, 6 December 2009 18:13:16 GMT