public-rdf-wg@w3.org from October 2013 by author

Andy Seaborne

• Re: telecon 23 Oct: draft agenda & preparation (Tuesday, 22 October)
• Re: RDF 1.1 CR request (Thursday, 17 October)
• Re: ISSUE-156: Media type parameter for turtle (Wednesday, 9 October)
• Re: (proposal) was Re: defn of Named Graph (Thursday, 3 October)
• Re: (proposal) was Re: defn of Named Graph (Thursday, 3 October)
• Re: [Turtle CR Issue] PREFIX with postfix parameter (Wednesday, 2 October)
• Re: [Turtle CR Issue] whitespace before '.' and ';' (Wednesday, 2 October)
• Re: [Turtle CR Issue] whitespace before '.' and ';' (Wednesday, 2 October)
• Re: ISSUE 144, minor wording issue about datasets in Semantics (Wednesday, 2 October)

Antoine Zimmermann

• Re: A comment on issue-148 (Friday, 25 October)
• Re: Comments on Last-Call Working Draft of RDF 1.1 Semantics (Wednesday, 23 October)
• Re: comments re issue-166 (Wednesday, 23 October)
• Re: Comments on Last-Call Working Draft of RDF 1.1 Semantics (Tuesday, 22 October)
• Re: Comments on Last-Call Working Draft of RDF 1.1 Concepts and Abstract Syntax (Sunday, 20 October)
• Re: RDFS-inconsistency of a strange RDF graph (Friday, 18 October)
• Re: RDF Concepts - Definition of "Generalized RDF" (Wednesday, 16 October)
• Re: RDF Concepts - Definition of "Generalized RDF" (Wednesday, 16 October)
• Re: ISSUE 149 - wording in Semantics in "Intuitive Summary" subsection (Friday, 4 October)
• Re: generalized RDF comment from David Booth (Wednesday, 2 October)
• Re: rdf semantics test suite setup (Wednesday, 2 October)
• Re: browser warnings on WG documents (Wednesday, 2 October)
• Re: generalized RDF comment from David Booth (Wednesday, 2 October)
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-142: rdfs:Graph ? comment [RDF Semantics] (Wednesday, 2 October)

Arnaud Le Hors

• RDF/JSON (Wednesday, 30 October)
• Re: telecon 23 Oct: draft agenda & preparation (Wednesday, 23 October)
• Re: agenda 16 Oct telecon (Wednesday, 16 October)

Dan Brickley

• Re: potential RDF entailment systems (Wednesday, 30 October)
• Re: generalized RDF comment from David Booth (Wednesday, 2 October)

David Wood

• Steps to Move Concepts to CR (Thursday, 17 October)
• Re: RDF Concepts - Definition of "Generalized RDF" (Wednesday, 16 October)
• Previous Editors in ReSpec Docs? (RDF WG ISSUE-150) (Wednesday, 16 October)
• Upcoming Publishing Moratoria (Tuesday, 15 October)
• Re: agenda 9 Oct telecon (Tuesday, 8 October)

Eric Prud'hommeaux

• removing normative reference to HTML5 (Wednesday, 30 October)
• PROPOSED resolution of Turtle LC comment 36 (Wednesday, 30 October)
• PROPOSED resolution of Turtle LC comment 38 (Wednesday, 30 October)
• Re: telecon 23 Oct: draft agenda & preparation (Wednesday, 23 October)
• edits made for Turtle CR (Wednesday, 23 October)
• Re: reified statements in Turtle (Wednesday, 16 October)
• Re: reified statements in Turtle (Wednesday, 16 October)
• Re: ISSUE-156: Media type parameter for turtle (Tuesday, 15 October)
• Re: reified statements in Turtle (Tuesday, 15 October)
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-148: LC Comment: IRIs do *not* always denote the same resource [RDF Concepts] (Friday, 4 October)
• [Turtle CR Issue] PREFIX with postfix parameter (Wednesday, 2 October)
• [Turtle CR Issue] whitespace before '.' and ';' (Wednesday, 2 October)
• Re: agenda 2 Oct telecon (Wednesday, 2 October)

Gavin Carothers

• Re: Consolidated local bibliographies / ACTION-313 (Wednesday, 23 October)
• Re: RDF 1.1 CR request (Friday, 18 October)
• Re: Last Call drafts of five RDF 1.1 documents (Thursday, 3 October)
• Minutes for 2013-10-02 (Wednesday, 2 October)

Gregg Kellogg

• Re: implementation reports (Thursday, 31 October)
• N-Triples/N-Quads/TriG/Semantics earl reports (Thursday, 31 October)
• Re: Consolidated local bibliographies / ACTION-313 (Thursday, 24 October)
• Re: Agenda: JSON-LD Telecon - Tuesday, October 22nd 2013 (Monday, 21 October)
• Re: agenda 16 Oct telecon (Wednesday, 16 October)
• Re: Agenda: JSON-LD Telecon - Tuesday, October 15th 2013 (Monday, 14 October)
• Re: running test suites (Wednesday, 9 October)
• Minutes for 09 Oct 2013 (Wednesday, 9 October)
• Re: agenda 9 Oct telecon (Tuesday, 8 October)
• Re: Proposed Dataset negative entailment test (Thursday, 3 October)
• Re: a question about turtle as it appears in the test manifests (Wednesday, 2 October)
• Proposed Dataset negative entailment test (Wednesday, 2 October)
• Re: JSON-LD Telecon Minutes for 2013-10-01 (Tuesday, 1 October)

Guus Schreiber

• RDF 1.1 CR transition (Wednesday, 30 October)
• agenda 30 Oct telecon [NOTE: for Europeans1 hour earlier] (Tuesday, 29 October)
• Re: what do we need for the CR meeting? (Wednesday, 23 October)
• Fwd: Transition Request: JSON-LD to Proposed Recommendation (Wednesday, 23 October)
• Fwd: Transition Request: RDF 1.1 Concepts, Semantics, TriG, N-Triples & N-Quads to Candidate Recommendation (Wednesday, 23 October)
• Re: telecon 23 Oct: draft agenda & preparation (Wednesday, 23 October)
• Re: comments re issue-166 (Wednesday, 23 October)
• telecon 23 Oct: draft agenda & preparation (Tuesday, 22 October)
• Fwd: Re: Your comments on RDFConcepts & Semantics (ISSUE-145, ISSUE-147, ISSUE-148, ISSUE-159) (Monday, 21 October)
• Re: RDF 1.1 CR request (Friday, 18 October)
• JSON-LD PR request (Wednesday, 16 October)
• RDF 1.1 CR request (Wednesday, 16 October)
• Fwd: Re: rdfs:Graph ? comment on http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf11-concepts/#section-dataset and issue 35 (ISSUE-142) (Wednesday, 16 October)
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-160: N-Triples LC WD typos [RDF N-Triples] (Wednesday, 16 October)
• Fwd: Your comments on RDFConcepts & Semantics (ISSUE-145, ISSUE-147, ISSUE-148, ISSUE-159) (Wednesday, 16 October)
• Re: agenda 16 Oct telecon (Tuesday, 15 October)
• agenda 16 Oct telecon (Tuesday, 15 October)
• Re: owl:imports and graph names and issue 38 (ISSUE-151) (Monday, 14 October)
• Re: treatment of -comments messages (Friday, 11 October)
• Re: status of Jeremy's main comments (ISSUE-142 and ISSUE-151) and two proposed responses (Friday, 11 October)
• agenda 9 Oct telecon (Tuesday, 8 October)
• Re: proposed response to Jeremy's comment on owl:imports and graph names and issue 38 (Tuesday, 8 October)
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-148: LC Comment: IRIs do *not* always denote the same resource [RDF Concepts] (Sunday, 6 October)
• Re: advice on appropriate responses to comments (Sunday, 6 October)
• Re: ISSUE 149 - wording in Semantics in "Intuitive Summary" subsection (Sunday, 6 October)
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-148: LC Comment: IRIs do *not* always denote the same resource [RDF Concepts] (Sunday, 6 October)
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-150: LC Comment: references and acknowledgements [RDF Concepts] (Sunday, 6 October)
• Re: proposed response to Jeremy's comment on owl:imports and graph names and issue 38 (Sunday, 6 October)
• Fwd: Last Call drafts of five RDF 1.1 documents (Thursday, 3 October)
• Fwd: Last Call drafts of five RDF 1.1 documents (Thursday, 3 October)
• Last Call drafts of five RDF 1.1 documents (Thursday, 3 October)
• agenda 2 Oct telecon (Tuesday, 1 October)

Ivan Herman

• Re: RDF 1.1 CR request (Thursday, 17 October)
• Re: reified statements in Turtle (Wednesday, 16 October)
• Fwd: Daylight Saving Time (DST) change reminder; 27-Oct to 3-Nov (Wednesday, 16 October)
• Re: reified statements in Turtle (Tuesday, 15 October)
• Re: status of Jeremy's main comments (ISSUE-142 and ISSUE-151) and two proposed responses (Thursday, 10 October)
• Re: ISSUE 149 - wording in Semantics in "Intuitive Summary" subsection (Saturday, 5 October)
• Fwd: [Moderator Action] RDF Semantics - Intuitive summary needs to be scoped to interpretations (Friday, 4 October)
• Re: [Turtle CR Issue] PREFIX with postfix parameter (Thursday, 3 October)
• response to Jeremy on ISSUE-144 (Thursday, 3 October)
• readme and license for entailment tests (Thursday, 3 October)

Kingsley Idehen

• Re: potential RDF entailment systems (Wednesday, 30 October)
• Re: ISSUE 149 - wording in Semantics in "Intuitive Summary" subsection (Saturday, 5 October)
• Re: ISSUE 149 - wording in Semantics in "Intuitive Summary" subsection (Saturday, 5 October)

Manu Sporny

• No telecon this week (Sunday, 27 October)
• JSON-LD Telecon Minutes for 2013-10-22 (Tuesday, 22 October)
• Agenda: JSON-LD Telecon - Tuesday, October 22nd 2013 (Monday, 21 October)
• JSON-LD Telecon Minutes for 2013-10-15 (Tuesday, 15 October)
• Agenda: JSON-LD Telecon - Tuesday, October 15th 2013 (Monday, 14 October)
• Re: JSON-LD blocked to PR by RDF Concepts (Wednesday, 9 October)
• JSON-LD blocked to PR by RDF Concepts (Wednesday, 9 October)
• JSON-LD Telecon Minutes for 2013-10-08 (Tuesday, 8 October)
• Agenda: JSON-LD Telecon - Tuesday, October 8th 2013 (Tuesday, 8 October)
• JSON-LD CR Implementers: Update to test suite (Wednesday, 2 October)
• JSON-LD Telecon Minutes for 2013-10-01 (Tuesday, 1 October)

Marcos Caceres

• Re: Previous Editors in ReSpec Docs? (RDF WG ISSUE-150) (Wednesday, 16 October)

Markus Lanthaler

• Static version of Concept's CR spec ready (Wednesday, 30 October)
• RE: removing normative reference to HTML5 (Wednesday, 30 October)
• RE: New edit of RDF Semantics. (was: Re: Unable to make changes using Mercurial) (Thursday, 24 October)
• RE: New edit of RDF Semantics. (was: Re: Unable to make changes using Mercurial) (Thursday, 24 October)
• RE: New edit of RDF Semantics. (was: Re: Unable to make changes using Mercurial) (Thursday, 24 October)
• RE: Consolidated local bibliographies / ACTION-313 (Thursday, 24 October)
• RE: Unable to make changes using Mercurial (Wednesday, 23 October)
• Consolidated local bibliographies / ACTION-313 (Wednesday, 23 October)
• JSON-LD PR Transition Request ready / ACTION-314 (Wednesday, 23 October)
• RE: comments re issue-166 (Wednesday, 23 October)
• RE: telecon 23 Oct: draft agenda & preparation (Tuesday, 22 October)
• RE: telecon 23 Oct: draft agenda & preparation (Tuesday, 22 October)
• RE: Agenda: JSON-LD Telecon - Tuesday, October 22nd 2013 (Monday, 21 October)
• RE: Agenda: JSON-LD Telecon - Tuesday, October 22nd 2013 (Monday, 21 October)
• Made JSON-LD API non-normative (Sunday, 20 October)
• RE: RDF Concepts - Definition of "Generalized RDF" (Wednesday, 16 October)
• RE: agenda 16 Oct telecon (Tuesday, 15 October)
• RE: agenda 16 Oct telecon (Tuesday, 15 October)
• RE: json-ld progress, was Re: agenda 9 Oct telecon (Wednesday, 9 October)
• RE: json-ld progress, was Re: agenda 9 Oct telecon (Wednesday, 9 October)
• RE: (proposal) was Re: defn of Named Graph (Friday, 4 October)
• RE: (proposal) was Re: defn of Named Graph (Thursday, 3 October)
• RE: RDF Concepts - Definition of "Generalized RDF" (Thursday, 3 October)
• RE: (proposal) was Re: defn of Named Graph (Thursday, 3 October)

Pat Hayes

• Re: message to RDF entailment implementors (Thursday, 31 October)
• editing fix to Semantics (Thursday, 31 October)
• A comment on issue-148 (Thursday, 24 October)
• Re: Your comments on RDFConcepts & Semantics (ISSUE-145, ISSUE-147, ISSUE-148, ISSUE-159) (Thursday, 24 October)
• Re: New edit of RDF Semantics. (was: Re: Unable to make changes using Mercurial) (Thursday, 24 October)
• Re: New edit of RDF Semantics. (was: Re: Unable to make changes using Mercurial) (Thursday, 24 October)
• New edit of RDF Semantics. (was: Re: Unable to make changes using Mercurial) (Thursday, 24 October)
• New edit of RDF Semantics. (was: Re: Unable to make changes using Mercurial) (Thursday, 24 October)
• Re: Consolidated local bibliographies / ACTION-313 (Thursday, 24 October)
• Unable to make changes using Mercurial (Wednesday, 23 October)
• comments re issue-166 (Wednesday, 23 October)
• Re: Comments on Last-Call Working Draft of RDF 1.1 Semantics (Wednesday, 23 October)
• Re: Your comments on RDFConcepts & Semantics (ISSUE-145, ISSUE-147, ISSUE-148, ISSUE-159) (Wednesday, 23 October)
• Re: Comments on Last-Call Working Draft of RDF 1.1 Concepts and Abstract Syntax (Sunday, 20 October)
• Response to ISSUE-159 (Tuesday, 15 October)
• Re: changes proposed in Semantics for ISSUE-159 (was Re: Proposed response to ISSUE-159) (Sunday, 13 October)
• Proposed response to ISSUE-159 (Saturday, 12 October)
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-159 (interpretations): RDF Semantics - Definition of "Interpretation" is missing [RDF Semantics] (Friday, 11 October)
• Re: status of Jeremy's main comments (ISSUE-142 and ISSUE-151) and two proposed responses (Thursday, 10 October)
• Re: proposed response to Jeremy's comment on owl:imports and graph names and issue 38 (Wednesday, 9 October)
• Re: proposed response to Jeremy's comment on owl:imports and graph names and issue 38 (Wednesday, 9 October)
• Re: proposed response to Jeremy's comment on owl:imports and graph names and issue 38 (Tuesday, 8 October)
• Re: ISSUE 149 - wording in Semantics in "Intuitive Summary" subsection (Saturday, 5 October)
• Re: ISSUE 149 - wording in Semantics in "Intuitive Summary" subsection (Saturday, 5 October)
• Re: [Moderator Action] RDF Semantics - Intuitive summary needs to be scoped to interpretations (Friday, 4 October)
• Re: ISSUE 149 - wording in Semantics in "Intuitive Summary" subsection (Friday, 4 October)
• Re: [Moderator Action] RDF Semantics - Intuitive summary needs to be scoped to interpretations (Friday, 4 October)
• advice on appropriate responses to comments (Friday, 4 October)
• Re: RDF Semantics - Identify vs. Denote distinction is not helpful (Friday, 4 October)
• Re: (proposal) was Re: defn of Named Graph (Friday, 4 October)
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-148: LC Comment: IRIs do *not* always denote the same resource [RDF Concepts] (Friday, 4 October)
• Re: RDF Semantics - Intuitive summary needs to be scoped to interpretations (Friday, 4 October)
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-148: LC Comment: IRIs do *not* always denote the same resource [RDF Concepts] (Thursday, 3 October)
• Re: RDF Semantics - Identify vs. Denote distinction is not helpful (Thursday, 3 October)
• Re: RDF Semantics - Intuitive summary needs to be scoped to interpretations (Thursday, 3 October)
• Re: Proposed Dataset negative entailment test (Thursday, 3 October)
• Re: generalized RDF comment from David Booth (Thursday, 3 October)

Patrick J. Hayes

• Re: RDF-ISSUE-142: rdfs:Graph ? comment [RDF Semantics] (Wednesday, 2 October)
• Re: generalized RDF comment from David Booth (Wednesday, 2 October)
• Re: ISSUE 144, minor wording issue about datasets in Semantics (Wednesday, 2 October)

Peter F. Patel-Schneider

• Re: what do we need for the CR meeting? (Wednesday, 23 October)
• what do we need for the CR meeting? (Wednesday, 23 October)
• Re: telecon 23 Oct: draft agenda & preparation (Wednesday, 23 October)
• Re: Datatype Maps, was Re: Comments on Last-Call Working Draft of RDF 1.1 Semantics (Tuesday, 22 October)
• Re: telecon 23 Oct: draft agenda & preparation (Tuesday, 22 October)
• Re: Comments on Last-Call Working Draft of RDF 1.1 Concepts and Abstract Syntax (Monday, 21 October)
• almost-CR version of Semantics (Sunday, 20 October)
• Re: Comments on Last-Call Working Draft of RDF 1.1 Concepts and Abstract Syntax (Sunday, 20 October)
• fixed up test case rdfs-entailment-2 (Friday, 18 October)
• Re: RDFS-inconsistency of a strange RDF graph (Friday, 18 October)
• Re: RDF 1.1 CR request (Friday, 18 October)
• RDFS-inconsistency of a strange RDF graph (Friday, 18 October)
• Re: RDF 1.1 CR request (Friday, 18 October)
• Re: RDF 1.1 CR request (Thursday, 17 October)
• Re: agenda 16 Oct telecon (Tuesday, 15 October)
• Re: rdfs:Graph ? comment on http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf11-concepts/#section-dataset and issue 35 (ISSUE-142) (Monday, 14 October)
• Re: owl:imports and graph names and issue 38 (ISSUE-151) (Monday, 14 October)
• Re: changes proposed in Semantics for ISSUE-159 (was Re: Proposed response to ISSUE-159) (Sunday, 13 October)
• changes proposed in Semantics for ISSUE-159 (was Re: Proposed response to ISSUE-159) (Saturday, 12 October)
• Re: Proposed response to ISSUE-159 (Saturday, 12 October)
• Re: Proposed response to ISSUE-159 (Saturday, 12 October)
• Re: treatment of -comments messages (Friday, 11 October)
• Re: status of Jeremy's main comments (ISSUE-142 and ISSUE-151) and two proposed responses (Thursday, 10 October)
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-159 (interpretations): RDF Semantics - Definition of "Interpretation" is missing [RDF Semantics] (Thursday, 10 October)
• treatment of -comments messages (Thursday, 10 October)
• running test suites (Wednesday, 9 October)
• Re: status of Jeremy's main comments (ISSUE-142 and ISSUE-151) and two proposed responses (Wednesday, 9 October)
• ack Brian McBride as previous series editor in Semantics ISSUE-150 (Wednesday, 9 October)
• status of Jeremy's main comments (ISSUE-142 and ISSUE-151) and two proposed responses (Wednesday, 9 October)
• Re: proposed response to Jeremy's comment on owl:imports and graph names and issue 38 (Wednesday, 9 October)
• Re: proposed response to Jeremy's comment on owl:imports and graph names and issue 38 (Wednesday, 9 October)
• Re: agenda 9 Oct telecon (Tuesday, 8 October)
• Re: proposed response to Jeremy's comment on owl:imports and graph names and issue 38 (Tuesday, 8 October)
• Re: proposed response to Jeremy's comment on owl:imports and graph names and issue 38 (Tuesday, 8 October)
• Re: proposed response to Jeremy's comment on owl:imports and graph names and issue 38 (Monday, 7 October)
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-148: LC Comment: IRIs do *not* always denote the same resource [RDF Concepts] (Sunday, 6 October)
• Re: ISSUE 149 - wording in Semantics in "Intuitive Summary" subsection (Saturday, 5 October)
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-148: LC Comment: IRIs do *not* always denote the same resource [RDF Concepts] (Friday, 4 October)

Peter Patel-Schneider

• candidate CR version of Semantics (Thursday, 31 October)
• implementation reports (Thursday, 31 October)
• Re: message to RDF entailment implementors (Thursday, 31 October)
• Re: potential RDF entailment systems (Wednesday, 30 October)
• message to RDF entailment implementors (Wednesday, 30 October)
• potential RDF entailment systems (Wednesday, 30 October)
• Re: ISSUE 149 - wording in Semantics in "Intuitive Summary" subsection (Friday, 4 October)
• ISSUE 149 - wording in Semantics in "Intuitive Summary" subsection (Friday, 4 October)
• Re: advice on appropriate responses to comments (Friday, 4 October)
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-148: LC Comment: IRIs do *not* always denote the same resource [RDF Concepts] (Thursday, 3 October)
• Re: RDF Semantics - Identify vs. Denote distinction is not helpful (Thursday, 3 October)
• Re: RDF Concepts - Definition of "Generalized RDF" (Thursday, 3 October)
• Re: RDF Semantics - Intuitive summary needs to be scoped to interpretations (Thursday, 3 October)
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-150: LC Comment: references and acknowledgements [RDF Concepts] (Thursday, 3 October)
• Re: a question about turtle as it appears in the test manifests (Wednesday, 2 October)
• Re: rdf semantics test suite setup (Wednesday, 2 October)
• a question about turtle as it appears in the test manifests (Wednesday, 2 October)
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-142: rdfs:Graph ? comment [RDF Semantics] (Wednesday, 2 October)
• Re: ISSUE 144, minor wording issue about datasets in Semantics (Wednesday, 2 October)
• Re: browser warnings on WG documents (Wednesday, 2 October)
• browser warnings on WG documents (Wednesday, 2 October)
• generalized RDF comment from David Booth (Wednesday, 2 October)
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-142: rdfs:Graph ? comment [RDF Semantics] (Wednesday, 2 October)
• ISSUE 144, minor wording issue about datasets in Semantics (Wednesday, 2 October)
• Re: rdf semantics test suite setup (Tuesday, 1 October)
• Re: rdf semantics test suite setup (Tuesday, 1 October)

Pierre-Antoine Champin

• Re: telecon 23 Oct: draft agenda & preparation (Thursday, 24 October)

RDF Working Group Issue Tracker

• RDF-ISSUE-169: DOM4 dependency [RDF Concepts] (Wednesday, 30 October)
• RDF-ISSUE-168: [JSON-LD Candidate Recommendation] (Wednesday, 30 October)
• RDF-ISSUE-167 (stronger dataset semantics): Stronger semantics of RDF Datasets? [RDF Semantics] (Wednesday, 23 October)
• RDF-ISSUE-166: LC Comment: Michael Schneider - non-urgent issues [RDF Semantics] (Tuesday, 22 October)
• RDF-ISSUE-165 (datatype map): LC Comment: datatype map [RDF Semantics] (Tuesday, 22 October)
• RDF-ISSUE-164 (@reverse bug): Pierre-Antoine Champin: @reverse algorithm is counter-intuitive [JSON-LD Candidate Recommendation] (Tuesday, 22 October)
• RDF-ISSUE-163 (@type overloading): Determine if @type overloading is acceptable for JSON-LD 1.0 [JSON-LD Candidate Recommendation] (Tuesday, 22 October)
• RDF-ISSUE-162 (OData/JSON-LD Convergence): Attempt to converge markup mechanisms for OData and JSON-LD [JSON-LD Candidate Recommendation] (Tuesday, 22 October)
• RDF-ISSUE-161: CR/CR Comment: Michael Schneider [RDF Concepts] (Sunday, 20 October)
• RDF-ISSUE-160: N-Triples LC WD typos [RDF N-Triples] (Wednesday, 16 October)
• RDF-ISSUE-159 (interpretations): RDF Semantics - Definition of "Interpretation" is missing [RDF Semantics] (Thursday, 10 October)
• ISSUE-158: Davidwood to make an editorial change to concepts in answer to action-147 (Wednesday, 9 October)
• ISSUE-157: Davidwood to make an editorial change to concepts in answer to issue-147 (Wednesday, 9 October)
• ISSUE-156: Media type parameter for turtle (Wednesday, 9 October)
• ISSUE-155: Media type parameter for turtle (Wednesday, 9 October)
• ISSUE-154: Media type parameter for turtle (Wednesday, 9 October)
• RDF-ISSUE-153: Ryan Laboucane: Blank Nodes as properties in JSON-LD [JSON-LD Candidate Recommendation] (Wednesday, 9 October)
• RDF-ISSUE-152: CR comment: reified statements in Turtle [RDF Turtle] (Tuesday, 8 October)
• RDF-ISSUE-151: LC comment: owl:imports and graph names and issue 38 [RDF Concepts] (Tuesday, 8 October)
• RDF-ISSUE-150: LC Comment: references and acknowledgements [RDF Concepts] (Thursday, 3 October)
• RDF-ISSUE-149: LC comment: Intuitive summary needs to be scoped to interpretations [RDF Semantics] (Wednesday, 2 October)
• RDF-ISSUE-148: LC Comment: IRIs do *not* always denote the same resource [RDF Concepts] (Wednesday, 2 October)
• RDF-ISSUE-147: Definition of "Generalized RDF" [RDF Concepts] (Wednesday, 2 October)
• RDF-ISSUE-146: procedural comment on LC of Concepts and Semantics [RDF Concepts] (Wednesday, 2 October)
• RDF-ISSUE-145: Identify vs. Denote distinction is not helpful [RDF Semantics] (Wednesday, 2 October)
• RDF-ISSUE-144: Minor normative error in LC drafts [RDF Semantics] (Tuesday, 1 October)

Sandro Hawke

• Re: comments re issue-166 (Wednesday, 23 October)
• Re: Comments on Last-Call Working Draft of RDF 1.1 Concepts and Abstract Syntax (Sunday, 20 October)
• Micheal Schneider's Comments on Last-Call Working Draft of RDF 1.1 Concepts and Abstract Syntax (Saturday, 19 October)
• Re: RDF 1.1 CR request (Friday, 18 October)
• Re: RDF 1.1 CR request (Friday, 18 October)
• Re: JSON-LD blocked to PR by RDF Concepts (Monday, 14 October)
• Re: status of Jeremy's main comments (ISSUE-142 and ISSUE-151) and two proposed responses (Friday, 11 October)
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-159 (interpretations): RDF Semantics - Definition of "Interpretation" is missing [RDF Semantics] (Thursday, 10 October)
• Re: status of Jeremy's main comments (ISSUE-142 and ISSUE-151) and two proposed responses (Wednesday, 9 October)
• Re: json-ld progress, was Re: agenda 9 Oct telecon (Wednesday, 9 October)
• Re: JSON-LD blocked to PR by RDF Concepts (Wednesday, 9 October)
• json-ld progress, was Re: agenda 9 Oct telecon (Wednesday, 9 October)
• Re: advice on appropriate responses to comments (Friday, 4 October)
• Re: browser warnings on WG documents (Wednesday, 2 October)
• Re: Proposed Dataset negative entailment test (Wednesday, 2 October)

Ted Thibodeau Jr

• Re: RDF Concepts - Definition of "Generalized RDF" (Wednesday, 16 October)

Last message date: Thursday, 31 October 2013 21:51:29 UTC