- From: Pat Hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>
- Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2013 13:03:39 -0500
- To: David Booth <david@dbooth.org>
- Cc: Guus Schreiber <guus.schreiber@vu.nl>, "public-rdf-comments@w3.org Comments" <public-rdf-comments@w3.org>, RDF Working Group <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
David, the Semantics document now has the text marked up in the way that you requested, as a definition. Pat On Oct 22, 2013, at 7:58 PM, Pat Hayes wrote: > David, you didn't get a response from me on this: > >> ISSUE-159 is almost satisfactory. I emailed Pat Hayes off list about this, and have not yet seen a response: >> [[ >> [Off list] >> >> Hi Pat, >> >> That looks good except that the font on the word "interpretation" is >> wrong: it is not appearing in bold as other defined terms appear when >> they are introduced. >> https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/rdf/raw-file/default/rdf-mt/index.html#notation-and-terminology >> >> Could you please fix that so that I can send back my official response >> saying that I am happy with this resolution? >> >> Thanks, >> David >> ]] > > > because I never got that message :-). Now I have it, my response is as follows. > > The fonts are assigned by ReSpec depending upon the content markup. This is not marked as a definition. As the text states, all the definitions are given subsequent to this paragraph. There are no internal hyperlinks to this paragraph; all internal links from any use of "interpretation" would go to the appropriate definition of simple interpretation, RDF interpretation, etc.. If this were marked as a definition, then all these links would redirect to here rather than where they should redirect to. > > I am not sure if this is still an official correspondence, but as it is CCd to public-rdf-comments, let us treat it as one. Please reply to public-rdf-comments indicating whether you find this resolution of ISSUE-159, with my added explanation, above, acceptable. > > Pat > > > ------------------------------------------------------------ > IHMC (850)434 8903 home > 40 South Alcaniz St. (850)202 4416 office > Pensacola (850)202 4440 fax > FL 32502 (850)291 0667 mobile (preferred) > phayes@ihmc.us http://www.ihmc.us/users/phayes > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------ IHMC (850)434 8903 home 40 South Alcaniz St. (850)202 4416 office Pensacola (850)202 4440 fax FL 32502 (850)291 0667 mobile (preferred) phayes@ihmc.us http://www.ihmc.us/users/phayes
Received on Thursday, 24 October 2013 18:04:12 UTC