- From: Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>
- Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2013 17:39:13 +0200
- To: <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
On Wednesday, October 02, 2013 4:35 AM, David Booth wrote: > Regarding section 7 > http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/WD-rdf11-concepts-20130723/#section- > generalized-rdf > > It does not look like my comments about Generalized RDF were addressed: > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf- > comments/2013Aug/0008.html > [[ > I think the most appropriate place for the definition of "generalized > RDF" would be in the RDF Semantics document, for two reasons: (a) > that's > where the notion is actually used (to simplify entailment rules); and > (b) that would give it less prominence and hence reduce the likelihood > that someone would think it is a form of standard RDF. > ]] JSON-LD links to that definition in Concepts. I don't think it would be a good idea to move it to Semantics. -- Markus Lanthaler @markuslanthaler
Received on Thursday, 3 October 2013 15:39:47 UTC