Re: ISSUE 149 - wording in Semantics in "Intuitive Summary" subsection

Le 04/10/2013 17:51, Peter Patel-Schneider a écrit :
[...]
>
> The difference is that David apparently believes that this section
> should be about truth in an interpretation whereas the current
> wording sits "above" this.
>
>
>
> Given that David's proposal is not false, and that it also does
> provide an intuitive summary, can everyone (who cares) live with
> David's wording?  I can.  The response that would go out should be
> fairly carefully written.


I care about this issue and can live with David's wording. I am actually 
favourable to accepting the wording and solve the issue.


AZ


>
>
> peter
>
>


-- 
Antoine Zimmermann
ISCOD / LSTI - Institut Henri Fayol
École Nationale Supérieure des Mines de Saint-Étienne
158 cours Fauriel
42023 Saint-Étienne Cedex 2
France
Tél:+33(0)4 77 42 66 03
Fax:+33(0)4 77 42 66 66
http://zimmer.aprilfoolsreview.com/

Received on Friday, 4 October 2013 18:50:35 UTC