- From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfpschneider@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2013 00:04:41 -0400
- To: Guus Schreiber <guus.schreiber@vu.nl>, RDF WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
I am uneasy with POSTPONING ISSUE-142. It is not as if the WG was unable to do anything with respect to this issue. Instead the WG decided to do very, very, very little with respect to this issue. I don't think that ISSUE-165 is suitable to be marked as AT-RISK. There are no observable behavioural differences in RDF systems dependent on this issue. Handling editorial issues: At some time, the WG needs to decide that adequate attention has been paid to an editorial issue. I suggest that the WG officially close most of the long-open editorial issues, making only the changes that have been determined up to now. peter On 10/22/2013 06:00 AM, Guus Schreiber wrote: > All, > > There is a draft agenda for tomorrow's telecon: > > http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/wiki/Meetings:Telecon2013.10.23 > > The agenda gives suggestions for how to handle the open issues for Concepts, > Semantics and the three syntax docs. Please comment/edit/add/... > > I'm still missing a draft PR request for JSON-LD. Hopefully we will be able > to discuss/decide that as well. > > Please assume the telecon will be for 75 min, with a possibility to extend > with 15 min. > > Guus >
Received on Wednesday, 23 October 2013 04:05:13 UTC