public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org from November 2005 by author

Bjoern Hoehrmann

Re: SPARQL: language tag issues (Tuesday, 22 November)
Re: [OK?] Re: SPARQL: Security Considerations (Monday, 14 November)
Re: [OK?] Re: SPARQL: Security Considerations (Monday, 14 November)
Re: [OK?] Re: SPARQL: Security Considerations (Friday, 11 November)
Re: [OK?] Re: SPARQL: language tag issues (Friday, 11 November)

Dan Connolly

Re: Traversing trees with sparql? [OK?] (Tuesday, 22 November)
[closed]: Roman Numeral test Was: Bug: "A value disjunction that encounters a type error on only one branch will return the result of evaluating the other branch." (Tuesday, 22 November)
Re: twinql Retrospective (Tuesday, 22 November)
Re: Comments on last-call SPARQL draft 20050721, sections 3 onwards (Tuesday, 22 November)
Re: Comments on last-call SPARQL draft 20050721, section 2 (Tuesday, 22 November)
Re: SPARQL: language tag issues (Tuesday, 22 November)
Re: CONSTRUCT: allow *? (Thursday, 17 November)
Re: [comments] Note about WSDL2 Binding (Monday, 7 November)
Re: need extar information in SPARQL [OK?] (Monday, 7 November)
Re: Sparql editorial comment: acknowledge prior art [OK?] (Saturday, 5 November)
Re: Sparql editorial comment: acknowledge prior art (Saturday, 5 November)

David Wood

SPARQL Comments (Personal) (Saturday, 5 November)

Don Cohen

disjunction, query language, data representation ... (Wednesday, 23 November)

Eric Prud'hommeaux

Re: SPARQL: language tag issues (Tuesday, 22 November)
[CLOSED] Re: SPARQL: Security Considerations (Monday, 14 November)
Re: [OK?] Re: SPARQL: Security Considerations (Monday, 14 November)
[CLOSED]: Roman Numeral test Was: Bug: "A value disjunction..." (Monday, 14 November)
Re: [OK?] Re: SPARQL: Security Considerations (Monday, 14 November)
[OK?] Re: SPARQL: language tag issues (Tuesday, 8 November)
[OK?] Re: SPARQL: isURI poorly named (Tuesday, 8 November)
[OK?] Re: SPARQL: isURI poorly named (Tuesday, 8 November)
[OK?] Re: SPARQL: Security Considerations (Tuesday, 8 November)

hugo

Voce e muito especial . . . hugo (Tuesday, 22 November)

Ivan Herman

[CLOSED] Re: SPARQL: Editorial comments on Last Call WD [OK?] (Thursday, 10 November)

Jacco van Ossenbruggen

[CLOSED] Re: Sparql editorial comment: acknowledge prior art (Tuesday, 8 November)

Jeen Broekstra

Re: disjunction, query language, data representation ... (Wednesday, 23 November)
Re: Comments on SPARQL: Semantics of queries involving named graphs [OK?] (Wednesday, 9 November)
Re: Comments on SPARQL: Querying the Dataset [OK?] (Wednesday, 9 November)

Karl Dubost

Re: [comments] Note about WSDL2 Binding (Monday, 7 November)

Kendall Clark

Re: SPARQL Protocol Spec Examples (Friday, 4 November)
Re: SPARQL Protocol Spec Examples (Friday, 4 November)
Re: SPARQL Protocol Spec Examples (Thursday, 3 November)
Re: Query By Reference in SPARQL Protocol (Thursday, 3 November)
Re: SPARQL Protocol Spec Examples (Thursday, 3 November)

Leigh Dodds

Re: SPARQL Protocol Spec Examples (Friday, 4 November)
Re: SPARQL Protocol Spec Examples (Friday, 4 November)
Re: Query By Reference in SPARQL Protocol (Thursday, 3 November)
Re: SPARQL Protocol Spec Examples (Thursday, 3 November)
SPARQL Protocol Spec Examples (Tuesday, 1 November)
Query By Reference in SPARQL Protocol (Tuesday, 1 November)
HTTP Status Codes for QueryRequestRefused (Tuesday, 1 November)

Leo Sauermann

CONSTRUCT: allow *? (Wednesday, 16 November)
sparql describe - options?! (Tuesday, 15 November)

Patrick Stickler

Re: CONSTRUCT: allow *? (Friday, 18 November)
Re: sparql describe - options?! (Tuesday, 15 November)

paul.downey@bt.com

Double binding of a WSDL 2.0 operation (Tuesday, 15 November)

Richard Newman

[closed] Re: twinql Retrospective (Tuesday, 22 November)
Re: CONSTRUCT: allow *? (Friday, 18 November)
Re: CONSTRUCT: allow *? (Thursday, 17 November)
Re: CONSTRUCT: allow *? (Thursday, 17 November)
Re: sparql describe - options?! (Tuesday, 15 November)
Re: Namespaces (Monday, 7 November)

Rigo Wenning

Re: SPARQL Protocol Privacy section (Monday, 21 November)

Ryan Levering

RE: General Document Comments [CLOSED] (Thursday, 10 November)

Seaborne, Andy

Re: Comments on SPARQL from the XML Query and the XSL WGs [OK?] (Wednesday, 23 November)
Re: CONSTRUCT: allow *? (Friday, 18 November)
Re: Comments [CLOSED] (Monday, 14 November)
Re: Comments [OK?] (Friday, 11 November)
Re: General Document Comments [OK?] (Wednesday, 9 November)
Re: SPARQL: Editorial comments on Last Call WD [OK?] (Monday, 7 November)
Re: Sparql editorial comment: acknowledge prior art (Saturday, 5 November)

Thomas Roessler

Section 3 of SPARQL protocol partially out of scope. (Thursday, 17 November)

Last message date: Wednesday, 23 November 2005 12:06:34 UTC