W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org > November 2005

Re: [OK?] Re: SPARQL: Security Considerations

From: Eric Prud'hommeaux <eric@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2005 16:20:15 -0500
To: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
Cc: public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org
Message-ID: <20051114212010.GB8297@w3.org>
On Mon, Nov 14, 2005 at 09:29:24PM +0100, Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote:
> * Eric Prud'hommeaux wrote:
> >Just to be clear, are you saying that SPARQL Query's Conformace
> >section should mention the UTF-8 security considerations, or that
> >the mime type registration should?
> I think s/The encoding is always UTF-8/The encoding is always UTF-8
> [RFC3629]/ where [RFC3629] is a normative reference, and something
> like 

You didn't finish your sentence, but I presume this normative
reference is what you had in mind:
    RFC 3629 UTF-8, a transformation format of ISO 10646, F. Yergeau
    January 1998

> >I've added some text to the mime registration:
> >[[
> >Security considerations:
> >    See SPARQL Query appendix C, Security Considerations as well
> >    as RFC 2279 section 7, Security Considerations.
> >]]
> but s/2279/3629/ as 2279 is obsolete.

Done. closed?

BTW, Thanks are in order for this and all your comments. You vigilence
is greatly appreciated.

office: +81.466.49.1170 W3C, Keio Research Institute at SFC,
                        Shonan Fujisawa Campus, Keio University,
                        5322 Endo, Fujisawa, Kanagawa 252-8520
        +1.617.258.5741 NE43-344, MIT, Cambridge, MA 02144 USA
cell:   +81.90.6533.3882

Feel free to forward this message to any list for any purpose other than
email address distribution.

Received on Monday, 14 November 2005 21:20:19 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:14:49 GMT