W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org > November 2005

Re: Comments [CLOSED]

From: Seaborne, Andy <andy.seaborne@hp.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2005 15:50:55 +0000
Message-ID: <4378B25F.7080505@hp.com>
To: public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org

For the scripts ...

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: Comments [OK?]
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2005 16:06:00 +0100
From: Faisal.Alkhateeb@inrialpes.fr
References: <1130310405.435f2b05113a6@listes-serv.inrialpes.fr> 
<4374890E.5070004@hp.com>

CLOSED

Best regards
Faisal Alkhateeb

Quoting "Seaborne, Andy" <andy.seaborne@hp.com>:

 >
 >
 >
 > Faisal.Alkhateeb@inrialpes.fr wrote:
 > > Hello,
 > >
 > > During reading the SPARQL LC draft, I have the following comments:
 > >
 > >    - In the paragraph that start with the "Abbreviated blank node syntax
 > can be
 > > combined with other abbreviations for common predicates and common objects"
 >
 > > under the subject "Blank nodes". I think it is "...  for common
 > subjects".
 > >
 > > Faisal Alkhateeb
 >
 > Thank you for the correction : the text inteh editors' working draft is
 > now:
 >
 > """
 > Abbreviated blank node syntax can be combined with other abbreviations for
 > common subjects and predicates.
 > """
 >
 > If this message addresses the comments raised, please could you respond
 > with
 > [CLOSED] in the subject line to allow the issue tracking scripts to close
 > this
 > issue.
 >
 > 	Thanks
 > 	Andy
 >
 >
 >
 >
Received on Monday, 14 November 2005 15:51:45 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:14:49 GMT