W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org > November 2005

Re: SPARQL Protocol Spec Examples

From: Kendall Clark <kendall@monkeyfist.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2005 16:51:25 -0500
Message-Id: <D2B6FD7A-D23D-4147-8985-16577A17F598@monkeyfist.com>
Cc: public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org
To: Leigh Dodds <leigh@ldodds.com>

On Nov 1, 2005, at 3:04 PM, Leigh Dodds wrote:

> Hi,
> Couple of points of feedback on the spec examples:
> There's a minor problem with the response example in
> " DESCRIBE with simple RDF dataset". I think the
> Content-Type should be application/rdf+xml in line with [1]
> rather than application/sparql-results+xml.

That sounds right. Thanks.

> Secondly, I think it would be useful if the fault examples
> demonstrated the use of the malformed-query and
> query-request-refused. The first example returns plain-text,
> the second an HTML document.

I'm not sure what you mean here.

> For consistency, i.e. always returning XML, I think it would be
> nicer if faults MUST return one of those elements and SHOULD include
> a human-readable error message.

I'm not sure what you mean here, either. Can you explain, or better,  
show me an HTTP response that looks like what you're suggesting?

It was a crime, I never told you 'bout the diamonds in your eyes.
Received on Thursday, 3 November 2005 21:51:37 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:52:06 UTC