W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org > November 2005

Re: Comments [OK?]

From: Seaborne, Andy <andy.seaborne@hp.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2005 12:05:34 +0000
Message-ID: <4374890E.5070004@hp.com>
To: Faisal.Alkhateeb@inrialpes.fr
CC: public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org



Faisal.Alkhateeb@inrialpes.fr wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> During reading the SPARQL LC draft, I have the following comments: 
> 
>    - In the paragraph that start with the "Abbreviated blank node syntax can be 
> combined with other abbreviations for common predicates and common objects" 
> under the subject "Blank nodes". I think it is "...  for common subjects".
> 
> Faisal Alkhateeb

Thank you for the correction : the text inteh editors' working draft is now:

"""
Abbreviated blank node syntax can be combined with other abbreviations for 
common subjects and predicates.
"""

If this message addresses the comments raised, please could you respond with
[CLOSED] in the subject line to allow the issue tracking scripts to close this
issue.

	Thanks
	Andy
Received on Friday, 11 November 2005 12:11:21 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:14:49 GMT