FW: ebXML Technical Architecture Specification Approved
[DS17] Rewrite of DS17
Namespaces in SOAP
RE: text/xml for SOAP (and XP) considered harmful
- RE: text/xml for SOAP (and XP) considered harmful
- RE: text/xml for SOAP (and XP) considered harmful
- RE: text/xml for SOAP (and XP) considered harmful
- RE: text/xml for SOAP (and XP) considered harmful
- RE: text/xml for SOAP (and XP) considered harmful
FYI: APEX
Faultcodes: where to define?
Comment on XML Protocol WG Issues List
SOAP/1.1 issues list now maintained by the W3C XML Protocol Working Group
Text for DS805 / DS807 in XML Protocol Requirements doc
FW: ebXML Integrates SOAP Into Messaging Services Spec
question
14 February teleconference minutes
RE: first class support for flow/correlation/reply-with header co ncept?
first class support for flow/correlation/reply-with header concept?
[AMG]: Notes from teleconference 15th February 2001
NetGratus
hello
7 February teleconference minutes
DS807
DS805
[AMG]: Revised Abstract Model draft document.
- Re: [AMG]: Revised Abstract Model draft document.
- RE: [AMG]: Revised Abstract Model draft document.
- RE: [AMG]: Revised Abstract Model draft document.
ADDR: Addressing discussion
NEw Guy
SOAP 1.1 Validator - predefined-entity counter questions
RE: Thoughts about path and intermediaries
- RE: Thoughts about path and intermediaries
- RE: Thoughts about path and intermediaries
- RE: Thoughts about path and intermediaries
- RE: Thoughts about path and intermediaries
- RE: Thoughts about path and intermediaries
- RE: Thoughts about path and intermediaries
- RE: Thoughts about path and intermediaries
- RE: Thoughts about path and intermediaries
- RE: Thoughts about path and intermediaries
- RE: Thoughts about path and intermediaries
Outputs of this working group?
[AMG] : PPT of diagram
- [AMG] Thoughts about path and intermediaries
- Re: [AMG] Thoughts about path and intermediaries
- RE: [AMG] Thoughts about path and intermediaries
- Re: Thoughts about path and intermediaries
- RE: [AMG] Thoughts about path and intermediaries
- RE: [AMG] Thoughts about path and intermediaries
- RE: [AMG] Thoughts about path and intermediaries
- RE: [AMG] Thoughts about path and intermediaries
- RE: [AMG] Thoughts about path and intermediaries
First interop
Happy ending
Jan 31, 2001 teleconference minutes
Intermediary Discussion
[AMG]: URLs for recent contributions.
RE: XP->SOAP/1.1 requirement mappings for R8xx (Intermediaries)
Sun's use of "XML RPC"
[R4xx] Application of XML Protocol Requirements to SOAP/1.1
[AMG] 6th Feb 2001 Subgroup phone conference minutes available
RE: [R3xx] Requirements Section "4.2 Simplicity and Stability" -- comparison with SOAP1.1.
SOAP DSIG Submission
Correlating SOAP Requests/Responses - For Multiple Outstanding requests
Intermediaries and XML Protocol
Clarification sought on DS805 and DS807
Re: Binary attachments to XP: or unipart vs. multipart
Re: Integrating XP Into Web Infrastructure
[AMG] Abstract Model and Intermediaries
XP (the 1999 version)
Call for Participation: W3C Workshop on Web services
Announce: SOAP 1.1 Validator Web App
Minutes of AMG tele-conference 30th Jan 2001
Call For Papers - PDPTA'2001 / Session: XML and Distributed Applications
Re: [DS5] Request with acknowledgement - revised
[DS8] Conversational message exchange - revised
[DS7] Third part intermediary - revised
Fwd: INT: Intermediary Discussion
RE: [AMG]: Glossary terms: XP Processor, XP Sender and XP Receive r.
Re: [AMG]: Glossary terms: XP Processor, XP Sender and XP Receiver.
INT: Re: Intermediary Discussion
Re: [AMG]: Glossary terms: XP Processor, XP Sender and XP Receiver.
[AMG]: Glossary terms: XP Processor, XP Sender and XP Receiver.
RE: [R3xx] Requirements Section "4.2 Simplicity and Stability" -- com parison with SOAP1.1.
- RE: [R3xx] Requirements Section "4.2 Simplicity and Stability" -- com parison with SOAP1.1.
- RE: [R3xx] Requirements Section "4.2 Simplicity and Stability" -- com parison with SOAP1.1.
INT: Intermediary Discussion
- Re: INT: Intermediary Discussion
- Re: INT: Intermediary Discussion
- INT: Re: Intermediary Discussion
- Re: INT: Intermediary Discussion