- From: Williams, Stuart <skw@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2001 15:20:57 -0000
- To: "'Sanjiva Weerawarana'" <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com>
- Cc: xml-dist-app@w3.org
Sanjiva, The current abstract model draft [1] models the service provided by XMLP as supporing both a one-way operation and a two-way request response operation. The implication of the latter is very much the correlation of the 'request' and 'response' messages from a single operation that you seem to asking for. The mechanism that provides such correlation within the protocol remains a matter of design. The model does not model more conversational/session oriented exchanges. We would have to do more work to abstract longer running exchanges or conversations that have a free-er message exchange pattern. [1] is a work in progress, so does not represent a concensus point amongst the members of the WG. Regards Stuart Williams [1] http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/1/02/16-abstract-model/XMLProtocolAMG.html > -----Original Message----- > From: Sanjiva Weerawarana [mailto:sanjiva@watson.ibm.com] > Sent: 20 February 2001 12:13 > To: xml-dist-app@w3.org > Subject: first class support for flow/correlation/reply-with header > concept? > > > IMO it would be useful if XMLP were to support some first > class notion of > flow ID (or correlation ID) as a header. Another way would be > to have the > ability to tag a header as some kind of "reply-with". > > This would allow one to use XMLP to invoke session-oriented > services even > when carried over non-session-oriented protocols. > > Is there any intent to support this capability (or an equivalent)? > > Thanks, > > Sanjiva. >
Received on Tuesday, 20 February 2001 10:21:11 UTC