- From: Dave Winer <dave@userland.com>
- Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2001 08:43:57 -0800
- To: <xml-rpc@egroups.com>, <xml-dist-app@w3.org>, "XML-Dev \(E-mail\)" <xml-dev@lists.xml.org>
Please check out this Sun Microsystems document: http://java.sun.com/aboutJava/communityprocess/jsr/jsr_101_xrpc.html Their marketing materials are highly disrespectful of the XML-RPC community, which has the largest deployed implementation of XML-over-HTTP technology, and has been in existence for almost three years. In their Contributions section, Sun points to everything else in this space, but not to XML-RPC. Here's a screen shot of that section. http://www.scripting.com/images/sunLikesOurNameButWontPoint.gif The first document they point to, the W3C survey of existing technologies, points directly to: http://www.xmlrpc.com/ as the first item in the list. Professionally and ethically I don't think Sun has a leg to stand on. At this point in the evolution of open distributed computing standards, to omit XML-RPC says more about Sun's fear than it does about the quality of work and broad support of XML-RPC. Sun mentions that they have the support of the following companies: Allaire, Apple, ATG, BEA, Bowstreet, Commerce One, HP/Bluestone, iPlanet, SilverStream, webMethods. I know technologists at these companies and consider them to have the highest ethics and integrity. Please correct this omission, Sun, and stop using the "XML-RPC" term in a generic fashion. Show the respect that is appropriate for a spec that so many independent developers are using. Thanks. Dave ______________________________ Dave Winer, UserLand Software Daily notes: http://www.scripting.com/ "It's even worse than it appears."
Received on Wednesday, 7 February 2001 11:45:00 UTC