xml-dist-app@w3.org from February 2001 by date

Wednesday, 28 February 2001

• RE: text/xml for SOAP (and XP) considered harmful John J. Barton
• RE: text/xml for SOAP (and XP) considered harmful Narahari, Sateesh
• RE: text/xml for SOAP (and XP) considered harmful Mike Dierken
• RE: text/xml for SOAP (and XP) considered harmful Mullins, Chalon
• Re: Namespaces in SOAP Noah_Mendelsohn@lotus.com
• FW: ebXML Technical Architecture Specification Approved Dick Brooks

Tuesday, 27 February 2001

• [DS17] Rewrite of DS17 Jeffrey Kay
• RE: Namespaces in SOAP John Daly
• Re: FYI: APEX Graham Klyne
• Namespaces in SOAP Oscar Pablo

Monday, 26 February 2001

• RE: text/xml for SOAP (and XP) considered harmful George Moore
• RE: text/xml for SOAP (and XP) considered harmful Mike Dierken
• FYI: APEX Mark Nottingham
• Faultcodes: where to define? Floren Linda ICN EN HO SE 924

Friday, 23 February 2001

• RE: Comment on XML Protocol WG Issues List Henrik Frystyk Nielsen
• RE: NetGratus Mike Dierken
• Comment on XML Protocol WG Issues List Evan Ireland

Thursday, 22 February 2001

• SOAP/1.1 issues list now maintained by the W3C XML Protocol Working Group Henrik Frystyk Nielsen
• RE: question Anne Thomas Manes
• Text for DS805 / DS807 in XML Protocol Requirements doc Glen Daniels
• FW: ebXML Integrates SOAP Into Messaging Services Spec Dick Brooks
• question Dennis Bosman

Wednesday, 21 February 2001

• 14 February teleconference minutes Hugo Haas

Tuesday, 20 February 2001

• RE: first class support for flow/correlation/reply-with header co ncept? Satish Thatte
• RE: first class support for flow/correlation/reply-with header co ncept? Williams, Stuart
• first class support for flow/correlation/reply-with header concept? Sanjiva Weerawarana

Monday, 19 February 2001

• Re: ADDR: Addressing discussion Jean-Jacques Moreau
• Re: Thoughts about path and intermediaries Jean-Jacques Moreau
• Re: Thoughts about path and intermediaries Jean-Jacques Moreau
• Re: [AMG] Thoughts about path and intermediaries Jean-Jacques Moreau
• [AMG]: Notes from teleconference 15th February 2001 Williams, Stuart

Friday, 16 February 2001

• RE: [SOAP] soap question Oisin Hurley
• NetGratus Mark Nottingham
• RE: [AMG]: Revised Abstract Model draft document. Williams, Stuart
• hello ajit deshmukh

Thursday, 15 February 2001

• RE: Thoughts about path and intermediaries Henrik Frystyk Nielsen
• RE: Thoughts about path and intermediaries Henrik Frystyk Nielsen
• Re: [AMG]: Revised Abstract Model draft document. Ray Denenberg
• Re: Thoughts about path and intermediaries Henrik Frystyk Nielsen
• RE: Thoughts about path and intermediaries Satish Thatte
• 7 February teleconference minutes Hugo Haas
• RE: Thoughts about path and intermediaries John J. Barton
• Re: Thoughts about path and intermediaries Noah_Mendelsohn@lotus.com
• RE: [AMG]: Revised Abstract Model draft document. Williams, Stuart

Wednesday, 14 February 2001

• Re: [AMG]: Revised Abstract Model draft document. Ray Denenberg
• Re: Thoughts about path and intermediaries Mark Nottingham
• RE: Thoughts about path and intermediaries Henrik Frystyk Nielsen
• RE: Thoughts about path and intermediaries Marc Hadley
• RE: Thoughts about path and intermediaries Yves Lafon
• Re: Thoughts about path and intermediaries Martin Gudgin
• RE: Thoughts about path and intermediaries Henrik Frystyk Nielsen
• DS807 Glen Daniels
• DS805 Glen Daniels
• RE: Thoughts about path and intermediaries Marc J. Hadley
• Re: Thoughts about path and intermediaries Yves Lafon
• Re: Thoughts about path and intermediaries marwan sabbouh
• RE: Thoughts about path and intermediaries Marc J. Hadley
• [AMG]: Revised Abstract Model draft document. Williams, Stuart
• Re: Thoughts about path and intermediaries Mark Nottingham
• RE: Thoughts about path and intermediaries Henrik Frystyk Nielsen
• RE: Thoughts about path and intermediaries Noah_Mendelsohn@lotus.com

Tuesday, 13 February 2001

• RE: Thoughts about path and intermediaries Williams, Stuart

Monday, 12 February 2001

• Re: INT: Re: Intermediary Discussion Mark Nottingham
• RE: ADDR: Addressing discussion Lucas Gonze
• Re: Thoughts about path and intermediaries Mark Nottingham
• RE: Thoughts about path and intermediaries Williams, Stuart
• Re: ADDR: Addressing discussion Mark Nottingham
• Re: Thoughts about path and intermediaries Mark Nottingham

Sunday, 11 February 2001

• ADDR: Addressing discussion Martin Gudgin
• Re: Thoughts about path and intermediaries Martin Gudgin

Friday, 9 February 2001

• NEw Guy Pix823
• Re: SOAP 1.1 Validator - predefined-entity counter questions Dave Winer
• SOAP 1.1 Validator - predefined-entity counter questions Daniel Barclay
• Re: Thoughts about path and intermediaries Mark Nottingham
• Re: Thoughts about path and intermediaries Martin Gudgin
• RE: [AMG] Thoughts about path and intermediaries Henrik Frystyk Nielsen
• RE: [AMG] : PPT of diagram Williams, Stuart
• RE: [AMG] Thoughts about path and intermediaries Henrik Frystyk Nielsen
• RE: [AMG] Thoughts about path and intermediaries Henrik Frystyk Nielsen
• RE: [AMG] : PPT of diagram Henrik Frystyk Nielsen
• RE: [AMG] : PPT of diagram Williams, Stuart
• Re: Thoughts about path and intermediaries Mark Nottingham
• RE: [AMG] Thoughts about path and intermediaries Dick Brooks
• RE: [AMG] Thoughts about path and intermediaries Williams, Stuart
• RE: [AMG] : PPT of diagram Scott Isaacson
• Re: Thoughts about path and intermediaries Martin Gudgin
• Re: [AMG] Thoughts about path and intermediaries Martin Gudgin
• RE: Thoughts about path and intermediaries Williams, Stuart
• RE: [AMG] : PPT of diagram Williams, Stuart
• RE: [AMG] Thoughts about path and intermediaries James Snell

Thursday, 8 February 2001

• Outputs of this working group? David Fallside

Friday, 9 February 2001

• Re: Thoughts about path and intermediaries Mark Nottingham
• RE: [AMG] : PPT of diagram Henrik Frystyk Nielsen
• RE: [AMG] Thoughts about path and intermediaries Dick Brooks
• Re: [AMG] Thoughts about path and intermediaries Rich Salz
• [AMG] Thoughts about path and intermediaries Martin Gudgin
• [AMG] : PPT of diagram Williams, Stuart
• RE: [SOAP] soap question Orchard, David
• Re: Intermediaries and XML Protocol Mark Nottingham

Thursday, 8 February 2001

• Re: Intermediaries and XML Protocol Mark Baker
• First interop Dave Winer
• RE: INT: Re: Intermediary Discussion Scott Cantor
• Re: INT: Re: Intermediary Discussion Noah_Mendelsohn@lotus.com

Wednesday, 7 February 2001

• XML-RPC political appearance (was Re: [xml-rpc] Sun's use of "XML RPC") Paul Libbrecht

Thursday, 8 February 2001

• Happy ending Dave Winer

Wednesday, 7 February 2001

• Jan 31, 2001 teleconference minutes Hugo Haas
• Re: INT: Re: Intermediary Discussion Ray Whitmer
• RE: INT: Re: Intermediary Discussion Williams, Stuart
• Re: INT: Re: Intermediary Discussion Mark Nottingham
• Re: Intermediary Discussion Mark Nottingham
• Intermediary Discussion James Snell
• Re: Intermediary Discussion Bob Cunnings
• Re: INT: Re: Intermediary Discussion Noah_Mendelsohn@lotus.com
• Re: Intermediary Discussion Mark Nottingham
• Re: XP->SOAP/1.1 requirement mappings for R8xx (Intermediaries) Mark Nottingham
• [AMG]: URLs for recent contributions. Williams, Stuart
• Re: INT: Re: Intermediary Discussion Mark Nottingham
• Re: INT: Intermediary Discussion Marwan Sabbouh
• RE: Re: Intermediary Discussion Williams, Stuart
• RE: XP->SOAP/1.1 requirement mappings for R8xx (Intermediaries) Henrik Frystyk Nielsen
• Re: Intermediary Discussion James Snell
• Sun's use of "XML RPC" Dave Winer
• [R4xx] Application of XML Protocol Requirements to SOAP/1.1 Paul Cotton
• [AMG] 6th Feb 2001 Subgroup phone conference minutes available Williams, Stuart
• RE: [R3xx] Requirements Section "4.2 Simplicity and Stability" -- com parison with SOAP1.1. David Ezell
• RE: [R3xx] Requirements Section "4.2 Simplicity and Stability" -- com parison with SOAP1.1. David Ezell
• Re: INT: Re: Intermediary Discussion Henry Lowe
• Re: Re: Intermediary Discussion Marwan Sabbouh
• RE: [R3xx] Requirements Section "4.2 Simplicity and Stability" -- comparison with SOAP1.1. David Ezell
• Re: INT: Re: Intermediary Discussion Yves Lafon
• Re: INT: Re: Intermediary Discussion Marc Hadley
• Re: INT: Re: Intermediary Discussion Martin Gudgin
• SOAP DSIG Submission David Fallside
• Re: INT: Re: Intermediary Discussion Mark Nottingham

Tuesday, 6 February 2001

• INT: Re: Intermediary Discussion Martin Gudgin
• Re: Correlating SOAP Requests/Responses - For Multiple Outstanding requests Noah_Mendelsohn@lotus.com
• Re: Intermediaries and XML Protocol Bob Cunnings
• RE: Integrating XP Into Web Infrastructure John Scott
• Re: Integrating XP Into Web Infrastructure Ken MacLeod
• Correlating SOAP Requests/Responses - For Multiple Outstanding requests Tom Miller
• RE: Clarification sought on DS805 and DS807 Glen Daniels
• Intermediaries and XML Protocol Mark Nottingham
• Clarification sought on DS805 and DS807 David Fallside

Monday, 5 February 2001

• Re: Binary attachments to XP: or unipart vs. multipart Daniel Barclay
• Re: Abstract Model and Intermediaries Mark Nottingham
• Re: Integrating XP Into Web Infrastructure Daniel Barclay
• [AMG] Abstract Model and Intermediaries Williams, Stuart

Sunday, 4 February 2001

• XP (the 1999 version) Tom Harding

Saturday, 3 February 2001

• Call for Participation: W3C Workshop on Web services Hugo Haas

Friday, 2 February 2001

• Announce: SOAP 1.1 Validator Web App Dave Winer
• Minutes of AMG tele-conference 30th Jan 2001 Williams, Stuart
• Call For Papers - PDPTA'2001 / Session: XML and Distributed Applications Fabio Arciniegas A.
• RE: [DS7] Third part intermediary - revised Nilo Mitra (EUS)
• Re: [DS5] Request with acknowledgement - revised john_ibbotson@uk.ibm.com
• [DS8] Conversational message exchange - revised john_ibbotson@uk.ibm.com
• [DS7] Third part intermediary - revised john_ibbotson@uk.ibm.com

Thursday, 1 February 2001

• Re: INT: Intermediary Discussion Hugo Haas
• Re: INT: Intermediary Discussion Craig Tataryn
• Fwd: INT: Intermediary Discussion Craig Tataryn
• RE: [AMG]: Glossary terms: XP Processor, XP Sender and XP Receive r. Williams, Stuart
• Re: [AMG]: Glossary terms: XP Processor, XP Sender and XP Receiver. Paul Denning
• INT: Re: Intermediary Discussion Scott Isaacson
• Re: [AMG]: Glossary terms: XP Processor, XP Sender and XP Receiver. Scott Isaacson
• [AMG]: Glossary terms: XP Processor, XP Sender and XP Receiver. Williams, Stuart
• RE: [R3xx] Requirements Section "4.2 Simplicity and Stability" -- com parison with SOAP1.1. Williams, Stuart
• INT: Intermediary Discussion Martin Gudgin
• RE: [SOAP] soap question Oisin Hurley
• Re: XP->SOAP/1.1 requirement mappings for R8xx (Intermediaries) Mark Nottingham

Last message date: Wednesday, 28 February 2001 16:37:30 UTC