- From: <Noah_Mendelsohn@lotus.com>
- Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2001 15:14:24 -0500
- To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@akamai.com>
- Cc: Martin Gudgin <marting@develop.com>, XML Protocol Comments <xml-dist-app@w3.org>
Mark Nottingham writes: >> However, the design shouldn't address this in the 'core' >> intermediary definition - it's too dependent on the >> transport binding and influenced by the application. Many applications will want to approach XP in a binding-independent manner. I think it is therefore important to have a clean set of rules for the proper use and implications of headers/intermediaries, independent of the binding. Indeed, the role of the binding should be to provide implementation of those semantics. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Noah Mendelsohn Voice: 1-617-693-4036 Lotus Development Corp. Fax: 1-617-693-8676 One Rogers Street Cambridge, MA 02142 ------------------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Wednesday, 7 February 2001 15:26:20 UTC