- From: Paul Libbrecht <paul@ags.uni-sb.de>
- Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2001 16:59:27 -0500 (EST)
- To: xml-rpc@yahoogroups.com, <xml-dist-app@w3.org>, "XML-Dev \(E-mail\)" <xml-dev@lists.xml.org>
Sir Dave, Others, Hoping you have read my previous mail, I insist on the greatness of XML-RPC ! Allow me to discuss the political "appearance" of XML-RPC. It is a bit the appearance of the little hackers, if I dare say. And of course Sun, his majesty, did not pay real attention to it (note that there are other times where javasoft really only looks at the commercial goals without necessarily measuring the complete impact of it). First XML-RPC implementations are, almost all, developed by individual enthusiasts. This makes it look... so to say... less "community involved" than, say, the (worldwide adopted, glorified, commercially recognized) Apache (huge) group. Second, the specification is a bit... friendly... I think one day someone worked on a formal one. This might need to be published as the standard (or the next version ?). The, so-to-say, lack of DTD also is politically deranging (and was such for one of our implementation, but we worked around it recently). Finally... being so implementation rich, I believe there are several lists around, maybe too much, which don't necessarily generate a huge trafic on this xml-rpc list. I liked all these points down here in xml-rpc world, but I can definitely imagine some folks consider it as something too relaxed... Paul
Received on Thursday, 8 February 2001 05:22:48 UTC