www-ws-desc@w3.org from April 2004 by date

Friday, 30 April 2004

Proposal for resolving issue 54: Allow binding to any HTTP method Hugo Haas
Re: Static vs. dynamic aspects of a service description (was Re: HTTP properties Mark Baker

Thursday, 29 April 2004

RE: Static vs. dynamic aspects of a service description (was Re: HTTP properties paul.downey@bt.com
Re: Static vs. dynamic aspects of a service description (was Re: HTTP properties Mark Nottingham
RE: Static vs. dynamic aspects of a service description (was Re: HTTP properties David Orchard
Minutes, 29 April 2004 WS Description WG Jonathan Marsh
RE: Static vs. dynamic aspects of a service description (was Re: HTTP properties Champion, Mike
Re: Static vs. dynamic aspects of a service description (was Re: HTTP properties Arthur Ryman
Minutes for 22 Apr 2004 Jonathan Marsh
Static vs. dynamic aspects of a service description (was Re: HTTP properties Mark Baker
HTTP properties David Orchard
Re: proposal: minor syntax improvement for soap fault bindings Umit Yalcinalp
proposal: minor syntax improvement for soap fault bindings Sanjiva Weerawarana
Re: updated soap binding syntax summary Sanjiva Weerawarana
updated soap binding syntax summary Sanjiva Weerawarana

Wednesday, 28 April 2004

Agenda, 29 April 2004 WS Desc telcon Jonathan Marsh
The purpose of bindings, interface and service Jacek Kopecky

Tuesday, 27 April 2004

Re: Issue 64 resolution: HTTP operations as WSDL operation names Roberto Chinnici

Monday, 26 April 2004

Re: Issue 64 resolution: HTTP operations as WSDL operation names Roberto Chinnici
RE: The purpose of bindings, interface and service paul.downey@bt.com

Friday, 23 April 2004

RE: The purpose of bindings, interface and service Liu, Kevin

Thursday, 22 April 2004

Re: Revised proposed Issue 54 resolution Mark Baker
RE: Revised proposed Issue 54 resolution David Orchard
Re: Issue 64 resolution: HTTP operations as WSDL operation names Mark Baker
Re: Issue 64 resolution: HTTP operations as WSDL operation names Amelia A Lewis
RE: Issue 64 resolution: HTTP operations as WSDL operation names paul.downey@bt.com
Re: Issue 64 resolution: HTTP operations as WSDL operation names Amelia A Lewis
Re: Revised proposed Issue 54 resolution Hugo Haas
RE: Issue 64 resolution: HTTP operations as WSDL operation names David Orchard
RE: Issue 64 resolution: HTTP operations as WSDL operation names David Orchard
RE: Issue 64 resolution: HTTP operations as WSDL operation names David Orchard
Re: Issue 64 resolution: HTTP operations as WSDL operation names Roberto Chinnici
RE: Issue 64 resolution: HTTP operations as WSDL operation names David Orchard
Re: Revised proposed Issue 54 resolution Mark Baker
Re: Issue 64 resolution: HTTP operations as WSDL operation names Roberto Chinnici

Wednesday, 21 April 2004

Re: Issue 64 resolution: HTTP operations as WSDL operation names Mark Baker
RE: Issue 54: allowing arbitrary HTTP methods (related to issue 147) David Orchard
Agenda, 22 April 2004 WS Desc telcon Jonathan Marsh
Revised proposed Issue 54 resolution David Orchard
RE: Issue 54 resolution Jonathan Marsh
SOAP 1.2 WebMethod support David Orchard
Issue 64 resolution: HTTP operations as WSDL operation names David Orchard
Issue 54 resolution David Orchard
Re: The purpose of bindings FABLET Youenn

Tuesday, 20 April 2004

Monday, 19 April 2004

RE: Which operation? David Orchard
Which operation? Mark Baker
SOAP 1.2, XML infoset and XML 1.1 Yves Lafon

Friday, 16 April 2004

Issue 54: allowing arbitrary HTTP methods (related to issue 147) Hugo Haas

Thursday, 15 April 2004

RE: Regrets for April 15 call He, Hao
Minutes, 15, Apr 2004 WS Desc telcon Allen Brookes
Regrets for April 15 call Vambenepe, William N
Regrets for April 15 call Tom Jordahl
Suggested Contents of Test Suite Arthur Ryman
Re: SOAP Web Method Feature, interface operation & HTTP binding (issues 54 & 64) Hugo Haas

Wednesday, 14 April 2004

RE: SOAP Web Method Feature, interface operation & HTTP binding (issues 54 & 64) David Orchard
Agenda, 15 April 2004 WS Desc telcon Jonathan Marsh
WSDL 2.0 HTTP authentication requirement Jonathan Marsh
HTTP binding: binding of faults Hugo Haas
SOAP Web Method Feature, interface operation & HTTP binding (issues 54 & 64) Hugo Haas

Tuesday, 13 April 2004

Re: The purpose of bindings Yaron Y. Goland
QA Operational Guideline/WSDL QA Plan Jonathan Marsh

Monday, 12 April 2004

RE: Effort to simplifying our spec Arthur Ryman

Friday, 9 April 2004

Minutes, 8 April 2004 WS Description WG telcon Jonathan Marsh
RE: The purpose of bindings paul.downey@bt.com
RE: A brief writeup of my validate-twice idea paul.downey@bt.com
RE: The purpose of bindings Anne Thomas Manes
RE: The purpose of bindings Glen Daniels
RE: The purpose of bindings Glen Daniels
Re: The purpose of bindings Jeff Mischkinsky
Re: The purpose of bindings Anne Thomas Manes
A brief writeup of my validate-twice idea Henry S. Thompson
The purpose of bindings Jacek Kopecky

Wednesday, 7 April 2004

Issue 54: bind to any HTTP operation David Orchard
HTTP Binding thoughts David Orchard
Re: WSDL describing Interface operation safety Dan Connolly
WSDL describing Interface operation safety David Orchard
Agenda, 8 April 2004 WS Desc telcon Jonathan Marsh

Tuesday, 6 April 2004

HTTP versioning proposal FABLET Youenn
HTTPS support proposal FABLET Youenn
RE: Issue 64, @method Jacek Kopecky
RE: Issue 64, @method paul.downey@bt.com
RE: Effort to simplifying our spec paul.downey@bt.com
Re: Issue 64, @method Mark Baker
RE: Effort to simplifying our spec Jonathan Marsh
RE: Issue 64, @method Jonathan Marsh

Monday, 5 April 2004

RE: Issue 64, @method David Orchard
RE: Issue 64, @method Jonathan Marsh

Sunday, 4 April 2004

Issue 64, @method Mark Baker

Friday, 2 April 2004

Minutes, 1 April 2004 WS Desc telcon Jonathan Marsh

Thursday, 1 April 2004

XML Schema PER review paul.downey@bt.com

Last message date: Friday, 30 April 2004 11:23:40 UTC