- From: Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
- Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2004 14:12:00 -0700
- To: <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
0. Dial in information (members only) [.1]:
See the public WG page [.2] for pointers to current documents and other
information, and the private page [.3] for administrative matters.
If you have additions to the agenda, please email them to the WG list
before the start of the telcon.
[.1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ws-desc/2004Apr/0023.html
[.2] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/
[.3] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/admin
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Agenda
1. Assign scribe. Lucky minute taker for this week is one of:
Jeff Mischkinsky, Bijan Parsia, David Booth, Asir Vedamuthu,
Glen Daniels, Roberto Chinnici, Amy Lewis, Erik Ackerman,
Adi Sakala, Arthur Ryman
--------------------------------------------------------------------
2. Approval of minutes:
- April 15th telcon [.1]. Late regrets from Hao He.
[.1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2004Apr/0040.html
--------------------------------------------------------------------
3. Review of Action items [.1].
? 2004-01-08: Pauld to write up examples of schemas for the
Primer.
? 2004-01-28: Philippe and JMarsh will look at the ipr for
test suite.
? 2004-02-12: DaveO to produce a refined proposal for Asynch
HTTP binding addressing the concerns of folks
that object to leaving replyTo info out of WSDL.
Done [.2] 2004-03-25: Hugo to look at the Handling Privacy in WSDL
2.0 for issues against our spec.
? 2004-04-01: Marsh will get schema tf going.
? 2004-04-01: Editors to update SOAP 1.2 Strawman proposal to
take Part 1 changes into account.
? 2004-04-08: Editors: to incorporate Youenn's proposal [.2]
with Jacek's modifications
(<http:support version="1.1"/>)
DONE [.3] 2004-04-15: DaveO to come up with a concrete proposal for
indicating REST operations at the interface.
DONE [.4] 2004-04-15: Hugo will look at adding extensions to http
proposal to allow arbitrary http verbs.
[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/#actions
[.2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2004Apr/0046.html
[.3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2004Apr/0052.html
[.4] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2004Apr/0042.html
---------------------------------------------------------------------
4. Administrivia
a. Non-renewing members: Sandeep Kumar
b. Upcoming FTFs
- May 19, 9:00 AM - 5:30 PM
May 20, 8:00 AM - 12:00 PM
1:30 PM - 3:30 PM testing task force meeting?
May 21, 8:00 AM - 4:00 PM
Hosted by IBM in NYC [.1], registration open [.2]
- August 2-4 (London)
Logistics [.3], registration [.4].
- September 14-16 (Toronto)
Tentative
c. XMLP WG uses SOAP 1.0 - any concerns as far as WSDL goes? [.5]
[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/04-05-f2f.htm
[.2] http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/34041/WSD0405/
[.3] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/04-08-f2f.htm
[.4] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ws-desc/2004Mar/0064.html
[.5] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2004Apr/0043.html
------------------------------------------------------------------
5. Task Force Status.
a. Media type description
- Waiting for draft
b. QA & Testing
- Suggested QA plan [.1]
- More details from Arthur [.2]
c. Schema versioning
- Waiting to hear back from Schema on my draft "charter."
- Henry's validate-twice write-up [.3]
[.1]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2004Apr/att-0029/QA_Oper
ational_Checklist.htm
[.2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2004Apr/0037.html
[.3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2004Apr/0019.html
------------------------------------------------------------------
6. New Issues. Issues list [.1].
- synchronize pseudo-schema (Hugo) [.2]
- Which operation? {Mark Baker) [.3]
[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/2/06/issues.html
[.2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2004Apr/0047.html
[.3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2004Apr/0044.html
------------------------------------------------------------------
7. Issue 165: Adding HTTPS support [.1]
- Jacek's "purpose of the binding" text [.2].
- Youenn's additions for "endpoints" [.3].
[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/2/06/issues.html#x165
[.2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2004Apr/0018.html
[.3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2004Apr/0050.html
------------------------------------------------------------------
8. Issue 64 [.1] Operations as HTTP verbs (Mark Baker) [.2, .3, .4]
- Hugo's webMethod proposal [.5 (first half)]
- Hugo's PUT/DELETE proposal [.5 (second half)]
- David's latest proposal for HTTP verbs [.6]
- David's latest proposal for webMethod markers [.7]
[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/2/06/issues.html#x64
[.2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2003Jan/0103.html
[.3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2003Jan/0111.html
[.4] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2003May/0094.html
[.5] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2004Apr/0031.html
[.6] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2004Apr/0052.html
[.7] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2004Apr/0053.html
------------------------------------------------------------------
9. Issue 54: Allow binding to any HTTP method [.1]
- DaveO's thoughts [.2]
- Hugo's thoughts [.3]
- DaveO's evil twin's thoughts [.4]
[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/2/06/issues.html#x54
[.2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2004Apr/0017.html
[.3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2004Apr/0042.html
[.4] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2004Apr/0051.html
------------------------------------------------------------------
10. Issue 147: HTTP binding uses static content-type header [.1]
- "... we can today describe operations using messages
consisting in XHTML or SVG documents. Using the HTTP binding,
these messages will have the "application/xml" mime type
while it would be more appropriate to use more precise mime
types ("application/xhtml+xml" or "image/svg+xml" for
instance). Therefore, it might be good to be able to set the
mime type to use for a given message, at least at the HTTP
binding level ..."
[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/2/06/issues.html#x147
------------------------------------------------------------------
11. Issue 55: Define binding to HTTP headers [.1]
- Do we want such capability?
[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/2/06/issues.html#x55
------------------------------------------------------------------
12. Issue 56: Define means to specify an authentication requirement
[.1]
- attempt to clarify commentor's intent
[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/2/06/issues.html#x56
[.2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2004Apr/0033.html
------------------------------------------------------------------
13. Issue 164: Support for HTTP chunking and other HTTP options [.1]
[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/2/06/issues.html#x164
------------------------------------------------------------------
Scheduled for future telcons
------------------------------------------------------------------
14. Effort to simplify our spec.
- DavidB [.1] and Jonathan [.2] have provided some data points.
- Arthur's suggestion [.3]
[.1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2004Mar/0162.html
[.2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2004Apr/0006.html
[.3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2004Apr/0028.html
------------------------------------------------------------------
15. SOAP 1.2 Binding
- Review Jean-Jacques' schema [.1] outlining an overall approach to
the binding.
[.1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2004Mar/0295.html
Received on Wednesday, 21 April 2004 17:12:34 UTC