proposal: minor syntax improvement for soap fault bindings from Sanjiva Weerawarana on 2004-04-29 (www-ws-desc@w3.org from April 2004)

From: Sanjiva Weerawarana <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2004 06:33:47 +0600
To: <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
Message-ID: <007501c42d81$be6e3060$02c8a8c0@LANKABOOK>

I suggest we move wsoap:code/wsoap:value to an attribute:

That is, instead of:

      <wsoap:code>
        <wsoap:value>xs:QName</wsoap:value>
        <wsoap:subcode>
          <wsoap:value>xs:QName</wsoap:value>
          <wsoap:subcode>...</wsoap:subcode>
        </wsoap:subcode>?
      </wsoap:code>

we do:

      <wsoap:code value="xs:QName">
        <wsoap:subcode value="xs:QName">
          <wsoap:subcode>...</wsoap:subcode>
        </wsoap:subcode>?
      </wsoap:code>

This makes the syntax more consistent with the rest of the
SOAP binding which is rather attribute-heavy.

Sanjiva.

Received on Wednesday, 28 April 2004 20:35:31 UTC