- From: Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
- Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2004 15:17:07 -0700
- To: <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
0. Dial in information (members only) [.1]:
See the public WG page [.2] for pointers to current documents and other
information, and the private page [.3] for administrative matters.
If you have additions to the agenda, please email them to the WG list
before the start of the telcon.
[.1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ws-desc/2004Apr/0028.html
[.2] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/
[.3] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/admin
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Agenda
1. Assign scribe. Lucky minute taker for this week is one of:
Jeff Mischkinsky, David Booth, Asir Vedamuthu,
Glen Daniels, Roberto Chinnici, Amy Lewis, Erik Ackerman,
Adi Sakala, Arthur Ryman
--------------------------------------------------------------------
2. Approval of minutes:
- April 22th telcon minutes delayed.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
3. Review of Action items [.1].
? 2004-01-08: Pauld to write up examples of schemas for the
Primer.
? 2004-01-28: Philippe and JMarsh will look at the ipr for
test suite.
? 2004-02-12: DaveO to produce a refined proposal for Asynch
HTTP binding addressing the concerns of folks
that object to leaving replyTo info out of WSDL.
? 2004-04-01: Marsh will get schema tf going.
? 2004-04-01: Editors to update SOAP 1.2 Strawman proposal to
take Part 1 changes into account.
DONE [.2] 2004-04-22: JacekK to add text on the purpose of endpoints
and incorporate Kevin's breakdown to
design/configuration/run-time.
DONE [.3] 2004-04-22: Marsh to add attribute vs. property syntax as
an issue.
DONE [.3] 2004-04-22: Marsh to add UseWebMethodAsOperation shortcut
syntax as an issue.
? 2004-04-22: DaveO to come up with list of HTTP
functionalities to evaluate the coverage of
our HTTP binding against.
[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/#actions
[.2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2004Apr/0077.html
[.3] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/2/06/issues.html
---------------------------------------------------------------------
4. Administrivia
a. Upcoming FTFs
- May 19, 9:00 AM - 5:30 PM
May 20, 8:00 AM - 12:00 PM
1:30 PM - 3:30 PM testing task force meeting?
May 21, 8:00 AM - 4:00 PM
Hosted by IBM in NYC [.1], registration open [.2]
- August 2-4 (London)
Logistics [.3], registration [.4].
- September 14-16 (Toronto)
Tentative
[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/04-05-f2f.htm
[.2] http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/34041/WSD0405/
[.3] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/04-08-f2f.htm
[.4] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ws-desc/2004Mar/0064.html
------------------------------------------------------------------
5. Task Force Status.
a. Media type description
- Waiting for draft
b. QA & Testing
- Suggested QA plan [.1]
- More details from Arthur [.2]
c. Schema versioning
- Waiting to hear back from Schema on my draft "charter."
- Henry's validate-twice write-up [.3]
[.1]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2004Apr/att-0029/QA_Oper
ational_Checklist.htm
[.2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2004Apr/0037.html
[.3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2004Apr/0019.html
------------------------------------------------------------------
6. New Issues. Issues list [.1].
- none
[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/2/06/issues.html
------------------------------------------------------------------
7. Issue 165: Adding HTTPS support [.1]
- Jacek's "purpose of the binding" text [.2].
- Still debating whether to put a specific marker in the binding
re: https (probably delay this; group with other HTTP features.)
[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/2/06/issues.html#x165
[.2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2004Apr/0077.html
------------------------------------------------------------------
8. Issue 54: Allow binding to any HTTP method [.1]
- DaveO's thoughts [.2]
- Hugo's thoughts [.3]
- DaveO's evil twin's thoughts [.4]
[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/2/06/issues.html#x54
[.2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2004Apr/0017.html
[.3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2004Apr/0042.html
[.4] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2004Apr/0051.html
------------------------------------------------------------------
9. Issue 169: Syntax for webMethod - property or attribute?
- DaveO proposed an attribute-based syntax for Web Method [.2]
- Hugo's generic property syntax [.3].
[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/2/06/issues.html#x169
[.2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2004Apr/0053.html
[.3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2004Apr/0031.html
------------------------------------------------------------------
10. Issue 170: Shortcut syntax for synchronizing webMethod and HTTP verb
- David Orchard proposes the http:binding could have an attribute
for re-using the webMethod: UseWebMethodAsHTTPOperations="true"...
[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/2/06/issues.html#x170
[.2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2004Apr/0035.html
------------------------------------------------------------------
11. Issue 163: Publishing WSDL 2.0 schema [.1]
- Media Type Description needs a WSDL 2.0 published schema to refer
to.
- Believe we've got that already [.2]
[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/2/06/issues.html#x163
[.2] http://www.w3.org/2004/03/wsdl
------------------------------------------------------------------
12. Tee up work for next week.
------------------------------------------------------------------
HTTP Features - Scheduled for future telcons
------------------------------------------------------------------
13. Issue 147: HTTP binding uses static content-type header [.1]
- "... we can today describe operations using messages
consisting in XHTML or SVG documents. Using the HTTP binding,
these messages will have the "application/xml" mime type
while it would be more appropriate to use more precise mime
types ("application/xhtml+xml" or "image/svg+xml" for
instance). Therefore, it might be good to be able to set the
mime type to use for a given message, at least at the HTTP
binding level ..."
[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/2/06/issues.html#x147
------------------------------------------------------------------
14. Issue 55: Define binding to HTTP headers [.1]
- Do we want such capability?
[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/2/06/issues.html#x55
------------------------------------------------------------------
15. Issue 56: Define means to specify an authentication requirement
[.1]
- attempt to clarify commentor's intent
[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/2/06/issues.html#x56
[.2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2004Apr/0033.html
------------------------------------------------------------------
16. Issue 164: Support for HTTP chunking and other HTTP options [.1]
[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/2/06/issues.html#x164
------------------------------------------------------------------
Scheduled for future telcons
------------------------------------------------------------------
17. Effort to simplify our spec.
- DavidB [.1] and Jonathan [.2] have provided some data points.
- Arthur's suggestion [.3]
[.1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2004Mar/0162.html
[.2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2004Apr/0006.html
[.3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2004Apr/0028.html
------------------------------------------------------------------
18. SOAP 1.2 Binding
- Review Jean-Jacques' schema [.1] outlining an overall approach to
the binding.
[.1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2004Mar/0295.html
Received on Wednesday, 28 April 2004 18:17:40 UTC