- From: Allen Brookes <abrookes@roguewave.com>
- Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2004 11:40:00 -0700
- To: w3c-ws-desc@w3.org, "'www-ws-desc@w3.org'" <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
Web Services Description Working Group;
2004-04-15 conference call minutes
Present:
David Booth W3C
Allen Brookes Rogue Wave Software
Roberto Chinnici Sun Microsystems
Paul Downey British Telecommunications
Youenn Fablet Canon
Yaron Goland BEA Systems
Hugo Haas W3C
Amelia Lewis TIBCO
Jonathan Marsh Chair (Microsoft)
Josephine Micallef Telcordia/SAIC
Jeff Mischkinsky Oracle
Dale Moberg Cyclone Commerce
David Orchard BEA Systems
Arthur Ryman IBM
Jerry Thrasher Lexmark
Sanjiva Weerawarana IBM
Umit Yalcinalp Oracle
Regrets:
Erik Ackerman Lexmark
Glen Daniels Sonic Software
Tom Jordahl Macromedia
Jacek Kopecky Systinet
Jean-Jacques Moreau Canon
Bijan Parsia University of Maryland MIND Lab
William Vambenepe Hewlett-Packard
Asir Vedamuthu webMethods
Prasad Yendluri webMethods, Inc.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
1. Approval of Minutes
Minutes approved
--------------------------------------------------------------------
3. Review of Action items [.1].
DONE [.2] 2003-09-18: Marsh to review the QA operational
guidelines.
PENDING 2004-01-08: Pauld to write up examples of schemas for the
Primer.
PENDING 2004-01-28: Philippe and JMarsh will look at the ipr for
test suite.
PENDING 2004-02-12: DaveO to produce a refined proposal for Asynch
HTTP binding addressing the concerns of folks
that object to leaving replyTo info out of WSDL.
PENDING 2004-03-25: Hugo to look at the Handling Privacy in WSDL
2.0 for issues against our spec.
PENDING 2004-04-01: Marsh will get schema tf going.
PENDING 2004-04-01: Editors to update SOAP 1.2 Strawman proposal to
take Part 1 changes into account.
DONE 2004-04-08: Hugo to let Marsh know if anyone hasn't been
reappointed.
DONE [.3] 2004-04-08: Marsh to send response on Schema PER
PENDING 2004-04-08: Editors: to incorporate Youenn's proposal [.2]
with Jacek's modifications
(<http:support version="1.1"/>)
DONE [.4] 2004-04-08: Jacek to write up his view of the purpose of the
bindings to be discussed further before
deciding how to close issue x165.
DONE [.5] 2004-04-08: Jmarsh to contact the x56 commenter for further
info. regarding this issue......desired
solutions/still an issue etc.??
DONE [.6] 2004-04-08: Hugo to propose "spec-ready" text for hoisting the
Web method feature of SOAP for use in a
non-SOAP binding.
[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/#actions
[.2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2004Apr/0029.html
[.3]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-schema-comments/2004AprJun/0
020.html
[.4] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2004Apr/0018.html
[.5] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2004Apr/0033.html
[.6] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2004Apr/0031.html
---------------------------------------------------------------------
4. Administrivia
a. Non-renewing members: Ingo Melzer, Michael Mahan, Jim Hendler, Bryan
Thompson
b. Upcoming FTFs - May 19, 9:00 AM - 5:30 PM May 20, 8:00 AM - 12:00 PM
(possible task force meetings in the afternoon) May 21, 8:00 AM - 4:00 PM
Hosted by IBM in NYC [.1] Registration open [.2] - August 2-4 (London)
Logistics [.3], registration [.4].
c. Charter renewal - everyone needs to be reappointed [.5] d.
WS-Reliability review [.6]
No volunteers for WS-Reliability - we won't look at it as a working group
------------------------------------------------------------------
5. Task Force Status.
a. Media type description - Waiting for draft
b. QA & Testing - Suggested QA plan
c. Schema versioning - Waiting to hear back from Schema on my draft
"charter."
Media type description trying to have telcon.
Everyone should look at QA plan
------------------------------------------------------------------
6. New Issues.
* Http Binding of faults (Hugo)
HTTP Binding of faults, how to serialize, how to relate to status codes,
Hugo has a proposal.
<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2004Apr/0032.html>
------------------------------------------------------------------
7. Issue 165: Adding HTTPS support [.1]
* Youenn suggests specific text about https: uris
* See also issue 56 - proposal is to close it - it's a hard thing to
get right
* .Jacek's "purpose of the binding" text
Youenn will add text about endpoints to Jacek's text about purpose of
binding.
Youenn proposes that we add a marker that indicates whether https can be
used.
Youenn - default is either http or https, marker can constrain to http or
https.
Sanjiva - adding marker is slippery slope to adding markers for other things
like authentication.
Yaron - where do we express expectations and policies for a service?
Umit - The answer is clear, F&P.
Sanjiva - shouldn't add anything to the core language for this.
Poll - do we need to have a marker to indicate the use of https?
3 yes, 6 no
Resolved to have no marker in core deliverables, add Jacek's text with
Youenn's addition.
Will leave 165 open pending purpose of binding text
------------------------------------------------------------------
8. Issue 64 [.1] Operations as HTTP verbs (Mark Baker) [.2, .3, .4]
* Jacek's synthesis [.5].
* Awaiting description from Philippe showing how properties or
extensions can be used to annotate the WSDL with RESTful properties. Ask
Mark for a definitive list of those properties so we can consider how to
associate them with property URIs or namespaces.
* Does the current draft [.6] with "method" attribute address this
issue? Not completely, Mark [.7] and DavidO [.8] reply.
DaveO - 2 issues: additional http methods, web method feature at the
interface and binding level.
Jonathan - gave an example of operations with names "get", "post", that bind
to http verbs.
DaveO - not enough, need a way to indicate for operations that have
different names, which REST operation semantic that have. (Like Atom).
DaveO - need to treat HTTP as transfer protocol, not just transport.
ACTION: DaveO will come up with concrete proposal.
Do we allow only a fixed set of http verbs or do we allow all, including
extensions?
ACTION: Hugo will look at adding extensions to http proposal to allow
arbitrary http verbs.
------------------------------------------------------------------
No discussion on remaining issues
------------------------------------------------------------------
New Action Items
ACTION: DaveO will come up with concrete proposal
ACTION: Hugo will look at adding extensions to http proposal to allow
arbitrary http verbs.
Received on Thursday, 15 April 2004 14:41:48 UTC