www-ws-desc@w3.org from April 2004 by author

Allen Brookes

• Minutes, 15, Apr 2004 WS Desc telcon (Thursday, 15 April)

Amelia A Lewis

• Re: Issue 64 resolution: HTTP operations as WSDL operation names (Thursday, 22 April)
• Re: Issue 64 resolution: HTTP operations as WSDL operation names (Thursday, 22 April)

Anne Thomas Manes

• RE: The purpose of bindings (Friday, 9 April)
• Re: The purpose of bindings (Friday, 9 April)

Arthur Ryman

• Re: Static vs. dynamic aspects of a service description (was Re: HTTP properties (Thursday, 29 April)
• Suggested Contents of Test Suite (Thursday, 15 April)
• RE: Effort to simplifying our spec (Monday, 12 April)

Champion, Mike

• RE: Static vs. dynamic aspects of a service description (was Re: HTTP properties (Thursday, 29 April)

Dan Connolly

• Re: WSDL describing Interface operation safety (Wednesday, 7 April)

David Orchard

• RE: Static vs. dynamic aspects of a service description (was Re: HTTP properties (Thursday, 29 April)
• HTTP properties (Thursday, 29 April)
• RE: Revised proposed Issue 54 resolution (Thursday, 22 April)
• RE: Issue 64 resolution: HTTP operations as WSDL operation names (Thursday, 22 April)
• RE: Issue 64 resolution: HTTP operations as WSDL operation names (Thursday, 22 April)
• RE: Issue 64 resolution: HTTP operations as WSDL operation names (Thursday, 22 April)
• RE: Issue 64 resolution: HTTP operations as WSDL operation names (Thursday, 22 April)
• RE: Issue 54: allowing arbitrary HTTP methods (related to issue 147) (Wednesday, 21 April)
• Revised proposed Issue 54 resolution (Wednesday, 21 April)
• SOAP 1.2 WebMethod support (Wednesday, 21 April)
• Issue 64 resolution: HTTP operations as WSDL operation names (Wednesday, 21 April)
• Issue 54 resolution (Wednesday, 21 April)
• RE: Which operation? (Monday, 19 April)
• RE: SOAP Web Method Feature, interface operation & HTTP binding (issues 54 & 64) (Wednesday, 14 April)
• Issue 54: bind to any HTTP operation (Wednesday, 7 April)
• HTTP Binding thoughts (Wednesday, 7 April)
• WSDL describing Interface operation safety (Wednesday, 7 April)
• RE: Issue 64, @method (Monday, 5 April)

FABLET Youenn

• Re: The purpose of bindings (Wednesday, 21 April)
• HTTP versioning proposal (Tuesday, 6 April)
• HTTPS support proposal (Tuesday, 6 April)

Glen Daniels

• RE: The purpose of bindings (Friday, 9 April)
• RE: The purpose of bindings (Friday, 9 April)

He, Hao

• RE: Regrets for April 15 call (Thursday, 15 April)

Henry S. Thompson

• A brief writeup of my validate-twice idea (Friday, 9 April)

Hugo Haas

• Proposal for resolving issue 54: Allow binding to any HTTP method (Friday, 30 April)
• Re: Revised proposed Issue 54 resolution (Thursday, 22 April)
• Re: features and requiredness (Tuesday, 20 April)
• Re: features and requiredness (Tuesday, 20 April)
• Issue 54: allowing arbitrary HTTP methods (related to issue 147) (Friday, 16 April)
• Re: SOAP Web Method Feature, interface operation & HTTP binding (issues 54 & 64) (Thursday, 15 April)
• HTTP binding: binding of faults (Wednesday, 14 April)
• SOAP Web Method Feature, interface operation & HTTP binding (issues 54 & 64) (Wednesday, 14 April)

Jacek Kopecky

• The purpose of bindings, interface and service (Wednesday, 28 April)
• The purpose of bindings (Friday, 9 April)
• RE: Issue 64, @method (Tuesday, 6 April)

Jeff Mischkinsky

• Re: The purpose of bindings (Friday, 9 April)

Jonathan Marsh

• Minutes, 29 April 2004 WS Description WG (Thursday, 29 April)
• Minutes for 22 Apr 2004 (Thursday, 29 April)
• Agenda, 29 April 2004 WS Desc telcon (Wednesday, 28 April)
• Agenda, 22 April 2004 WS Desc telcon (Wednesday, 21 April)
• RE: Issue 54 resolution (Wednesday, 21 April)
• Agenda, 15 April 2004 WS Desc telcon (Wednesday, 14 April)
• WSDL 2.0 HTTP authentication requirement (Wednesday, 14 April)
• QA Operational Guideline/WSDL QA Plan (Tuesday, 13 April)
• Minutes, 8 April 2004 WS Description WG telcon (Friday, 9 April)
• Agenda, 8 April 2004 WS Desc telcon (Wednesday, 7 April)
• RE: Effort to simplifying our spec (Tuesday, 6 April)
• RE: Issue 64, @method (Tuesday, 6 April)
• RE: Issue 64, @method (Monday, 5 April)
• Minutes, 1 April 2004 WS Desc telcon (Friday, 2 April)

Liu, Kevin

• RE: The purpose of bindings, interface and service (Friday, 23 April)

Mark Baker

• Re: Static vs. dynamic aspects of a service description (was Re: HTTP properties (Friday, 30 April)
• Static vs. dynamic aspects of a service description (was Re: HTTP properties (Thursday, 29 April)
• Re: Revised proposed Issue 54 resolution (Thursday, 22 April)
• Re: Issue 64 resolution: HTTP operations as WSDL operation names (Thursday, 22 April)
• Re: Revised proposed Issue 54 resolution (Thursday, 22 April)
• Re: Issue 64 resolution: HTTP operations as WSDL operation names (Wednesday, 21 April)
• Re: Which operation? (Tuesday, 20 April)
• Which operation? (Monday, 19 April)
• Re: Issue 64, @method (Tuesday, 6 April)
• Issue 64, @method (Sunday, 4 April)

Mark Nottingham

• Re: Static vs. dynamic aspects of a service description (was Re: HTTP properties (Thursday, 29 April)
• Re: Which operation? (Tuesday, 20 April)

paul.downey@bt.com

• RE: Static vs. dynamic aspects of a service description (was Re: HTTP properties (Thursday, 29 April)
• RE: The purpose of bindings, interface and service (Monday, 26 April)
• RE: Issue 64 resolution: HTTP operations as WSDL operation names (Thursday, 22 April)
• RE: The purpose of bindings (Friday, 9 April)
• RE: A brief writeup of my validate-twice idea (Friday, 9 April)
• RE: Issue 64, @method (Tuesday, 6 April)
• RE: Effort to simplifying our spec (Tuesday, 6 April)
• XML Schema PER review (Thursday, 1 April)

Roberto Chinnici

• Re: Issue 64 resolution: HTTP operations as WSDL operation names (Tuesday, 27 April)
• Re: Issue 64 resolution: HTTP operations as WSDL operation names (Monday, 26 April)
• Re: Issue 64 resolution: HTTP operations as WSDL operation names (Thursday, 22 April)
• Re: Issue 64 resolution: HTTP operations as WSDL operation names (Thursday, 22 April)

Sanjiva Weerawarana

• proposal: minor syntax improvement for soap fault bindings (Thursday, 29 April)
• Re: updated soap binding syntax summary (Thursday, 29 April)
• updated soap binding syntax summary (Thursday, 29 April)

Tom Jordahl

• Regrets for April 15 call (Thursday, 15 April)

Umit Yalcinalp

• Re: proposal: minor syntax improvement for soap fault bindings (Thursday, 29 April)

Vambenepe, William N

• Regrets for April 15 call (Thursday, 15 April)

Yaron Y. Goland

• Re: The purpose of bindings (Tuesday, 13 April)

Yves Lafon

• SOAP 1.2, XML infoset and XML 1.1 (Monday, 19 April)

Last message date: Friday, 30 April 2004 11:23:40 UTC