- From: FABLET Youenn <youenn.fablet@crf.canon.fr>
- Date: Tue, 06 Apr 2004 17:15:32 +0200
- To: www-ws-desc@w3.org
- Message-ID: <4072C994.7000004@crf.canon.fr>
Here are some thoughts about HTTP versioning (I can provide some more precise, infoset+component model wordings, if there is consensus). I suggest to: 1) create an http:version element which has a value attribute that will contain the HTTP version used 2) use the [http | wsoap]:binding element as a placeholder for this element. 3) if the http:version element is not present in a description, HTTP1.1 is implied. It makes sense to me to add within the wsoap:binding element, pieces of information that are: - related to the use of the soap transport protocol (identified via the @protocol attribute) - applicable to the whole binding and not settable on a per-operation basis. This proposal might also depend on the decision about which HTTP options we want to describe (I assume here that only the version information has reached consensus). Here is an illustrating example: <!-- soap/http binding--> <wsdl:binding ...> <wsoap:binding protocol="http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap/bindings/HTTP/"> <http:version value="1.1"/> <!-- other http related options if needed --> </wsoap:binding> ... </wsdl:binding> <!-- http binding--> <wsdl:binding ...> <http:binding> <http:version value="1.1"/> <!-- other options if needed --> </http:binding> ... </wsdl:binding> Thoughts? Youenn
Received on Tuesday, 6 April 2004 11:16:30 UTC