www-rdf-logic@w3.org from October 2000 by date

Wednesday, 1 November 2000

Re: DAML-ONT: RDF syntax Dan Connolly

Tuesday, 31 October 2000

Re: names, URIs and ontologies pat hayes
Re: names, URIs and ontologies Seth Russell
Re: names, URIs and ontologies pat hayes
Re: names, URIs and ontologies pat hayes
Re: names, URIs and ontologies Lynn Andrea Stein
Re: names, URIs and ontologies pat hayes
Re: names, URIs and ontologies Pierre-Antoine CHAMPIN

Monday, 30 October 2000

RE: names, URIs and ontologies Emery, Pat
names, URIs and ontologies Lynn Andrea Stein
Bound variables Drew McDermott
Re: names, URIs and ontologies jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com
Re: names, URIs and ontologies Pierre-Antoine CHAMPIN

Saturday, 28 October 2000

Friday, 27 October 2000

names, URIs and ontologies pat hayes
Re: Instance Data Question Mike Dean

Thursday, 26 October 2000

Instance Data Question DaCosta . Ben

Wednesday, 25 October 2000

Re: DAML-ONT: RDF syntax Dan Brickley
Re: DAML-ONT: RDF syntax Pierre-Antoine CHAMPIN
RE: DAML-ONT: RDF syntax Holmes III, William S

Tuesday, 24 October 2000

Re: DAML-ONT: RDF syntax Dan Connolly
DAML-ONT: RDF syntax Sergey Melnik
RE: Re[1] DAML-ONT: the case for closedness Je'ro^me Euzenat
RE: Re[1] DAML-ONT: the case for closedness Jim Hendler
RE: Re[1] DAML-ONT: the case for closedness jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com

Monday, 23 October 2000

RE: Re[1] DAML-ONT: the case for closedness pat hayes
RE: Re[1] DAML-ONT: the case for closedness pat hayes
Expressing Inference Rules Brown, Lawrence M.
RE: Re[1] DAML-ONT: the case for closedness Jim Hendler
RE: Re[1] DAML-ONT: the case for closedness Je'ro^me Euzenat

Friday, 20 October 2000

RE: Re[1] DAML-ONT: the case for closedness Hart, Lewis
Re[1] DAML-ONT: the case for closedness Pierre-Antoine CHAMPIN
Re: DAML-ONT: the case for closedness Jeff Heflin
RE: DAML-ONT: the case for closedness Hart, Lewis
Re: Meta-classes? (layered architecture) Je'ro^me Euzenat
daml-ont and oil Deborah McGuinness
Re: DAML-ONT: the case for closedness Deborah McGuinness

Thursday, 19 October 2000

Re: DAML-ONT: the case for closedness Jeff Heflin
Re: DAML-ONT: the case for closedness Jeff Heflin
Re: DAML-ONT: the case for closedness pat hayes
RE: DAML-ONT: the case for closedness Hart, Lewis
Re: DAML-ONT: the case for closedness Jeff Heflin
Re: DAML-ONT: the case for closedness Pierre-Antoine CHAMPIN
Re: DAML-ONT: the case for closedness Je'ro^me Euzenat
Re: DAML-ONT: the case for closedness Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Re: DAML-ONT: the case for closedness Frank van Harmelen

Wednesday, 18 October 2000

Re: DAML-ONT: the case for closedness Je'ro^me Euzenat

Thursday, 19 October 2000

Re: Meta-classes? (layered architecture) Dan Connolly

Wednesday, 18 October 2000

Re: Variables in rdf (Re: capturing 'foreall' in a graph picture) Didier Villevalois

Monday, 16 October 2000

Re: DAML-ONT: the case for closedness pat hayes
complexity of reasoning in DAML-ONT Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Re: Meta-classes? (layered architecture) pat hayes
Re: Meta-classes? (layered architecture) Ian Horrocks
Re: Meta-classes? (layered architecture) pat hayes
Re: Meta-classes? (layered architecture) Ian Horrocks
Re: Meta-classes? (layered architecture) pat hayes
Re: comparing DAML-ONT and OIL (was Re: semantics of daml) pat hayes
Re: basic decisions underlying DAML-ONT (defined classes) pat hayes
Concrete types Ian Horrocks
Re: status of DAML-ONT Jim Hendler
Re: comparing DAML-ONT and OIL (was Re: semantics of daml) Ian Horrocks
Re: basic decisions underlying DAML-ONT (defined classes) Peter F. Patel-Schneider
status of DAML-ONT Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Re: comparing DAML-ONT and OIL (was Re: semantics of daml) Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Re: DAML/RDF: a semantics and 2 more syntaxes Ian Horrocks
Semantics or not semantics? Ian Horrocks
Re: comparing DAML-ONT and OIL (was Re: semantics of daml) Ian Horrocks
Meta-classes? (layered architecture) Ian Horrocks
Assertion -v- inference Ian Horrocks
Relying on RDF(S) semantics Ian Horrocks
Does DAML-ONT extend RDFS? Ian Horrocks
DAML-ONT: the case for closedness Je'ro^me Euzenat

Sunday, 15 October 2000

Re: comparing DAML-ONT and OIL (was Re: semantics of daml) Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Re: Cardinality restrictions (was: comparing DAML-ONT and OIL) Dlmcg1@aol.com
Re: comparing DAML-ONT and OIL (was Re: semantics of daml) Dan Connolly
Re: Cardinality restrictions (was: comparing DAML-ONT and OIL) Dan Connolly
Re: basic decisions underlying DAML-ONT (defined classes) Dan Connolly
Cardinality restrictions (was: comparing DAML-ONT and OIL) Frank van Harmelen
Re: DAML/RDF: a semantics and 2 more syntaxes Frank van Harmelen
Re: DAML/RDF: a semantics and 2 more syntaxes Frank van Harmelen
Re: basic decisions underlying DAML-ONT (defined classes) Frank van Harmelen

Saturday, 14 October 2000

Re: DAML/RDF: a semantics and 2 more syntaxes Dan Connolly
Re: DAML/RDF: a semantics and 2 more syntaxes Peter F. Patel-Schneider

Friday, 13 October 2000

Re: semantics of daml:equivalentTo Jim Hendler
DAML/RDF: a semantics and 2 more syntaxes Dan Connolly
Re: semantics of daml:equivalentTo [was: Comments on Annotated DAML 1.6] pat hayes
Re: semantics of daml:equivalentTo [was: Comments on Annotated DAML 1.6] Drew McDermott
Re: semantics of daml:equivalentTo Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Re: semantics of daml:equivalentTo [was: Comments on Annotated DAML 1.6] Jeff Heflin
Re: semantics of daml:equivalentTo [was: Comments on Annotated DAML 1.6] pat hayes
comparing DAML-ONT and OIL (was Re: semantics of daml) Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Re: semantics of daml:equivalentTo [was: Comments on Annotated DAML 1.6] Bill Andersen
Re: semantics of daml:equivalentTo [was: Comments on Annotated DAML 1.6] Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Re: semantics of daml Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Re: semantics of daml:equivalentTo [was: Comments on Annotated DAML 1.6] pat hayes
more DAML-ONT comments jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com

Thursday, 12 October 2000

Re: semantics of daml:equivalentTo [was: Comments on Annotated DAML 1.6] Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Re: semantics of daml:equivalentTo [was: Comments on Annotated DAML 1.6] Jeff Heflin
Re: basic decisions underlying DAML-ONT Jim Hendler
Re: basic decisions underlying DAML-ONT Jim Hendler
Re: basic decisions underlying DAML-ONT (defined classes) Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Re: basic decisions underlying DAML-ONT (defined classes) Dan Connolly
Re: basic decisions underlying DAML-ONT Drew McDermott
Re: basic decisions underlying DAML-ONT (defined classes) Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Re: basic decisions underlying DAML-ONT Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Re: basic decisions underlying DAML-ONT Jim Hendler
Re: basic decisions underlying DAML-ONT (defined classes) Dlmcg1@aol.com
Re: basic decisions underlying DAML-ONT (defined classes) Dan Connolly
basic decisions underlying DAML-ONT Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Re: semantics of daml:equivalentTo [was: Comments on Annotated DAML 1.6] Dan Connolly
Re: semantics of daml:equivalentTo [was: Comments on Annotated DAML 1.6] Pierre-Antoine CHAMPIN
Dintinguish among ontology, metadata repositories and data dictionary Gann Ketty

Wednesday, 11 October 2000

Re: semantics of daml:equivalentTo [was: Comments on Annotat jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com
Re: semantics of daml:equivalentTo [was: Comments on Annotat Jim Hendler
Re: semantics of daml:equivalentTo [was: Comments on Annotat Dan Connolly
Re: semantics of daml:equivalentTo [was: Comments on Annotat jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com
Re: semantics of daml:equivalentTo [was: Comments on Annotated DAML 1.6] Bill Andersen
Re: semantics of daml:equivalentTo [was: Comments on Annotated DAML 1.6] Robert E. Kent
Re: semantics of daml:equivalentTo [was: Comments on Annotated DAML 1.6] Jim Hendler
EU Commission: SEMANTIC WEB TECHNOLOGIES Workshop Hans-Georg Stork
semantics of daml:equivalentTo [was: Comments on Annotated DAML 1.6] Dan Connolly
Assertion by reference [was: Comments on Annotated DAML...] Dan Connolly
Re: Comments on Annotated DAML Ontology Markup, rev 1.6, date 2000/10/07 Dan Connolly
Comments on Annotated DAML Ontology Markup, rev 1.6, date 2000/10/07 Grit Denker

Tuesday, 10 October 2000

1st public release - DAML-ONT Jim Hendler

Wednesday, 4 October 2000

Re: First pass at DAML/OIL mapping Mike Dean

Monday, 2 October 2000

For review: some DAML thoughts Dan Connolly

Last message date: Tuesday, 31 October 2000 19:00:37 UTC