www-rdf-logic@w3.org from October 2000 by author

Bill Andersen

• Re: semantics of daml:equivalentTo [was: Comments on Annotated DAML 1.6] (Friday, 13 October)
• Re: semantics of daml:equivalentTo [was: Comments on Annotated DAML 1.6] (Wednesday, 11 October)

Brown, Lawrence M.

• Expressing Inference Rules (Monday, 23 October)

DaCosta . Ben

• Instance Data Question (Thursday, 26 October)

Dan Brickley

• Re: DAML-ONT: RDF syntax (Wednesday, 25 October)

Dan Connolly

• Re: DAML-ONT: RDF syntax (Wednesday, 1 November)
• Re: DAML-ONT: RDF syntax (Tuesday, 24 October)
• Re: Meta-classes? (layered architecture) (Thursday, 19 October)
• Re: comparing DAML-ONT and OIL (was Re: semantics of daml) (Sunday, 15 October)
• Re: Cardinality restrictions (was: comparing DAML-ONT and OIL) (Sunday, 15 October)
• Re: basic decisions underlying DAML-ONT (defined classes) (Sunday, 15 October)
• Re: DAML/RDF: a semantics and 2 more syntaxes (Saturday, 14 October)
• DAML/RDF: a semantics and 2 more syntaxes (Friday, 13 October)
• Re: basic decisions underlying DAML-ONT (defined classes) (Thursday, 12 October)
• Re: basic decisions underlying DAML-ONT (defined classes) (Thursday, 12 October)
• Re: semantics of daml:equivalentTo [was: Comments on Annotated DAML 1.6] (Thursday, 12 October)
• Re: semantics of daml:equivalentTo [was: Comments on Annotat (Wednesday, 11 October)
• semantics of daml:equivalentTo [was: Comments on Annotated DAML 1.6] (Wednesday, 11 October)
• Assertion by reference [was: Comments on Annotated DAML...] (Wednesday, 11 October)
• Re: Comments on Annotated DAML Ontology Markup, rev 1.6, date 2000/10/07 (Wednesday, 11 October)
• For review: some DAML thoughts (Monday, 2 October)

Deborah McGuinness

• daml-ont and oil (Friday, 20 October)
• Re: DAML-ONT: the case for closedness (Friday, 20 October)

Didier Villevalois

• Re: Variables in rdf (Re: capturing 'foreall' in a graph picture) (Wednesday, 18 October)

Dlmcg1@aol.com

• Re: Cardinality restrictions (was: comparing DAML-ONT and OIL) (Sunday, 15 October)
• Re: basic decisions underlying DAML-ONT (defined classes) (Thursday, 12 October)

Drew McDermott

• Bound variables (Monday, 30 October)
• Re: semantics of daml:equivalentTo [was: Comments on Annotated DAML 1.6] (Friday, 13 October)
• Re: basic decisions underlying DAML-ONT (Thursday, 12 October)

Emery, Pat

• RE: names, URIs and ontologies (Monday, 30 October)

Frank van Harmelen

• Re: DAML-ONT: the case for closedness (Thursday, 19 October)
• Cardinality restrictions (was: comparing DAML-ONT and OIL) (Sunday, 15 October)
• Re: DAML/RDF: a semantics and 2 more syntaxes (Sunday, 15 October)
• Re: DAML/RDF: a semantics and 2 more syntaxes (Sunday, 15 October)
• Re: basic decisions underlying DAML-ONT (defined classes) (Sunday, 15 October)

Gann Ketty

• Dintinguish among ontology, metadata repositories and data dictionary (Thursday, 12 October)

Grit Denker

• Comments on Annotated DAML Ontology Markup, rev 1.6, date 2000/10/07 (Wednesday, 11 October)

Hans-Georg Stork

• EU Commission: SEMANTIC WEB TECHNOLOGIES Workshop (Wednesday, 11 October)

Hart, Lewis

• RE: Re[1] DAML-ONT: the case for closedness (Friday, 20 October)
• RE: DAML-ONT: the case for closedness (Friday, 20 October)
• RE: DAML-ONT: the case for closedness (Thursday, 19 October)

Holmes III, William S

• RE: DAML-ONT: RDF syntax (Wednesday, 25 October)

Ian Horrocks

• Re: Meta-classes? (layered architecture) (Monday, 16 October)
• Re: Meta-classes? (layered architecture) (Monday, 16 October)
• Concrete types (Monday, 16 October)
• Re: comparing DAML-ONT and OIL (was Re: semantics of daml) (Monday, 16 October)
• Semantics or not semantics? (Monday, 16 October)
• Re: DAML/RDF: a semantics and 2 more syntaxes (Monday, 16 October)
• Re: comparing DAML-ONT and OIL (was Re: semantics of daml) (Monday, 16 October)
• Meta-classes? (layered architecture) (Monday, 16 October)
• Relying on RDF(S) semantics (Monday, 16 October)
• Assertion -v- inference (Monday, 16 October)
• Does DAML-ONT extend RDFS? (Monday, 16 October)

Je'ro^me Euzenat

• RE: Re[1] DAML-ONT: the case for closedness (Tuesday, 24 October)
• RE: Re[1] DAML-ONT: the case for closedness (Monday, 23 October)
• Re: Meta-classes? (layered architecture) (Friday, 20 October)
• Re: DAML-ONT: the case for closedness (Thursday, 19 October)
• Re: DAML-ONT: the case for closedness (Wednesday, 18 October)
• DAML-ONT: the case for closedness (Monday, 16 October)

Jeff Heflin

• Re: DAML-ONT: the case for closedness (Friday, 20 October)
• Re: DAML-ONT: the case for closedness (Thursday, 19 October)
• Re: DAML-ONT: the case for closedness (Thursday, 19 October)
• Re: DAML-ONT: the case for closedness (Thursday, 19 October)
• Re: semantics of daml:equivalentTo [was: Comments on Annotated DAML 1.6] (Friday, 13 October)
• Re: semantics of daml:equivalentTo [was: Comments on Annotated DAML 1.6] (Thursday, 12 October)

Jim Hendler

• RE: Re[1] DAML-ONT: the case for closedness (Tuesday, 24 October)
• RE: Re[1] DAML-ONT: the case for closedness (Monday, 23 October)
• Re: status of DAML-ONT (Monday, 16 October)
• Re: semantics of daml:equivalentTo (Friday, 13 October)
• Re: basic decisions underlying DAML-ONT (Thursday, 12 October)
• Re: basic decisions underlying DAML-ONT (Thursday, 12 October)
• Re: basic decisions underlying DAML-ONT (Thursday, 12 October)
• Re: semantics of daml:equivalentTo [was: Comments on Annotat (Wednesday, 11 October)
• Re: semantics of daml:equivalentTo [was: Comments on Annotated DAML 1.6] (Wednesday, 11 October)
• 1st public release - DAML-ONT (Tuesday, 10 October)

jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com

• Re: names, URIs and ontologies (Monday, 30 October)
• RE: Re[1] DAML-ONT: the case for closedness (Tuesday, 24 October)
• more DAML-ONT comments (Friday, 13 October)
• Re: semantics of daml:equivalentTo [was: Comments on Annotat (Wednesday, 11 October)
• Re: semantics of daml:equivalentTo [was: Comments on Annotat (Wednesday, 11 October)

Lynn Andrea Stein

• Re: names, URIs and ontologies (Tuesday, 31 October)
• names, URIs and ontologies (Monday, 30 October)

Mike Dean

• Re: Instance Data Question (Friday, 27 October)
• Re: First pass at DAML/OIL mapping (Wednesday, 4 October)

pat hayes

• Re: names, URIs and ontologies (Tuesday, 31 October)
• Re: names, URIs and ontologies (Tuesday, 31 October)
• Re: names, URIs and ontologies (Tuesday, 31 October)
• Re: names, URIs and ontologies (Tuesday, 31 October)
• names, URIs and ontologies (Friday, 27 October)
• RE: Re[1] DAML-ONT: the case for closedness (Monday, 23 October)
• RE: Re[1] DAML-ONT: the case for closedness (Monday, 23 October)
• Re: DAML-ONT: the case for closedness (Thursday, 19 October)
• Re: DAML-ONT: the case for closedness (Monday, 16 October)
• Re: Meta-classes? (layered architecture) (Monday, 16 October)
• Re: Meta-classes? (layered architecture) (Monday, 16 October)
• Re: Meta-classes? (layered architecture) (Monday, 16 October)
• Re: comparing DAML-ONT and OIL (was Re: semantics of daml) (Monday, 16 October)
• Re: basic decisions underlying DAML-ONT (defined classes) (Monday, 16 October)
• Re: semantics of daml:equivalentTo [was: Comments on Annotated DAML 1.6] (Friday, 13 October)
• Re: semantics of daml:equivalentTo [was: Comments on Annotated DAML 1.6] (Friday, 13 October)
• Re: semantics of daml:equivalentTo [was: Comments on Annotated DAML 1.6] (Friday, 13 October)

Peter F. Patel-Schneider

• Re: DAML-ONT: the case for closedness (Thursday, 19 October)
• complexity of reasoning in DAML-ONT (Monday, 16 October)
• Re: basic decisions underlying DAML-ONT (defined classes) (Monday, 16 October)
• status of DAML-ONT (Monday, 16 October)
• Re: comparing DAML-ONT and OIL (was Re: semantics of daml) (Monday, 16 October)
• Re: comparing DAML-ONT and OIL (was Re: semantics of daml) (Sunday, 15 October)
• Re: DAML/RDF: a semantics and 2 more syntaxes (Saturday, 14 October)
• Re: semantics of daml:equivalentTo (Friday, 13 October)
• comparing DAML-ONT and OIL (was Re: semantics of daml) (Friday, 13 October)
• Re: semantics of daml:equivalentTo [was: Comments on Annotated DAML 1.6] (Friday, 13 October)
• Re: semantics of daml (Friday, 13 October)
• Re: semantics of daml:equivalentTo [was: Comments on Annotated DAML 1.6] (Thursday, 12 October)
• Re: basic decisions underlying DAML-ONT (defined classes) (Thursday, 12 October)
• Re: basic decisions underlying DAML-ONT (defined classes) (Thursday, 12 October)
• Re: basic decisions underlying DAML-ONT (Thursday, 12 October)
• basic decisions underlying DAML-ONT (Thursday, 12 October)

Pierre-Antoine CHAMPIN

• Re: names, URIs and ontologies (Tuesday, 31 October)
• Re: names, URIs and ontologies (Monday, 30 October)
• Re: DAML-ONT: RDF syntax (Wednesday, 25 October)
• Re[1] DAML-ONT: the case for closedness (Friday, 20 October)
• Re: DAML-ONT: the case for closedness (Thursday, 19 October)
• Re: semantics of daml:equivalentTo [was: Comments on Annotated DAML 1.6] (Thursday, 12 October)

RA Poell

• URL Correction (Saturday, 28 October)
• Re: names, URIs and ontologies (Saturday, 28 October)

Robert E. Kent

• Re: semantics of daml:equivalentTo [was: Comments on Annotated DAML 1.6] (Wednesday, 11 October)

Sergey Melnik

• Re: DAML-ONT: RDF syntax (Saturday, 28 October)
• DAML-ONT: RDF syntax (Tuesday, 24 October)

Seth Russell

• Re: names, URIs and ontologies (Tuesday, 31 October)

Last message date: Tuesday, 31 October 2000 19:00:37 UTC