RE: Re[1] DAML-ONT: the case for closedness

Pat Hayes:
> This means that (barring some new security mechanism) one
> should never archive a bare conclusion, but only archive a
> conclusion together with its derivation (logical proof).

Archive and communicate: e.g. a service can be provided when
the proof is accepted and something that is derived from that
proof could be returned by the service provider (as an invoice
or something like that) ... and we get audit trails and so on.

--
Jos De Roo

Received on Tuesday, 24 October 2000 04:21:29 UTC