www-qa@w3.org from September 2003 by author

Al Gilman

Re: [qaframe-spec] conformance tools vs. broken specs (Tuesday, 2 September)

Alex Rousskov

Re: [DRAFT] QA Tips - Gif versus PNG (Friday, 19 September)
Re: [DRAFT] QA Tips - Gif versus PNG (Thursday, 18 September)
Re: [DRAFT] QA Tips - Gif versus PNG (Thursday, 18 September)
Re: [DRAFT] QA Tips - Gif versus PNG (Thursday, 18 September)
Re: QA Tips: Make readable URIs (Thursday, 18 September)
Re: QA Tips: Make readable URIs (Thursday, 18 September)
Re: [DRAFT] QA Tips - Gif versus PNG (Thursday, 18 September)
Re: QA Tips: Make readable URIs (Thursday, 18 September)
Re: definition of test assertion (Monday, 15 September)
Re: definition of atomic (Monday, 15 September)
Re: [qaframe-spec] What is an implementation? (Friday, 5 September)
Re: [qaframe-spec] What is an implementation? (Thursday, 4 September)
Re: [qaframe-spec] What is an implementation? (Wednesday, 3 September)
Re: [qaframe-spec] What is an implementation? (Wednesday, 3 September)
Re: [qaframe-spec] What is testable? (Wednesday, 3 September)

Bjoern Hoehrmann

Re: QA Tips: Make readable URIs (Friday, 19 September)
Re: [qaframe-spec] conformance tools vs. broken specs (Tuesday, 9 September)
Re: [qaframe-spec] What is an implementation? (Tuesday, 9 September)
Re: [qaframe-spec] What is testable? (Sunday, 7 September)
Re: [qaframe-spec] What is an implementation? (Thursday, 4 September)
Re: [qaframe-spec] What is an implementation? (Thursday, 4 September)
Re: [qaframe-spec] What is testable? (Thursday, 4 September)
Re: [qaframe-spec] What is testable? (Thursday, 4 September)
Re: [qaframe-spec] What is an implementation? (Thursday, 4 September)
Re: [qaframe-spec] What is testable? (Wednesday, 3 September)
Re: [qaframe-spec] What is an implementation? (Wednesday, 3 September)
[qaframe-spec] What is an implementation? (Wednesday, 3 September)
[qaframe-spec] What is testable? (Wednesday, 3 September)
[qaframe-spec] conformance tools vs. broken specs (Monday, 1 September)
[qaframe-spec] highlight checkpoint headings (Monday, 1 September)
[qaframe-spec] No abbreviations in requirements (Monday, 1 September)

Brian Kelly

RE: QA Tips: Make readable URIs (Friday, 19 September)
Broken link (Thursday, 18 September)

Charles McCathieNevile

Re: [Fwd: browsable test results] (Saturday, 27 September)
% and "almost passed" Re: browsable test results (Friday, 12 September)
Re: [Fwd: browsable test results] (Friday, 12 September)

Dan Connolly

[Fwd: browsable test results] (Friday, 12 September)

david_marston@us.ibm.com

Re: browsable test results (Friday, 12 September)
Re: browsable test results (Friday, 12 September)
Re: [qaframe-spec] What is an implementation? (Saturday, 6 September)
Re: [qaframe-spec] What is an implementation? (Thursday, 4 September)

Dimitris Dimitriadis

Minutes QA WG Telcon 20030903 (Friday, 12 September)

Dominique Hazaël-Massieux

Re: [DRAFT] QA Tips - Gif versus PNG (Friday, 19 September)
Re: QA Tips: Make readable URIs (Thursday, 18 September)
Re: QA Tips: Make readable URIs (Thursday, 18 September)
Re: QA Tips: Make readable URIs (Thursday, 18 September)
Minutes of QA WG Teleconference 2003-09-08 (Monday, 15 September)
Re: [qaframe-spec] What is testable? (Tuesday, 9 September)
Re: [qaframe-spec] What is an implementation? (Tuesday, 9 September)
Re: [qaframe-spec] What is an implementation? (Friday, 5 September)

Jeremy Carroll

Recommendations, and W3C Policy (Tuesday, 9 September)

Jim Ley

Re: [qaframe-spec] What is testable? (Wednesday, 3 September)

Karl Dubost

Re: [DRAFT] QA Tips - Gif versus PNG (Thursday, 18 September)
Re: [DRAFT] QA Tips - Gif versus PNG (Thursday, 18 September)
Re: [DRAFT] QA Tips - Gif versus PNG (Thursday, 18 September)
[DRAFT] QA Tips - Gif versus PNG (Thursday, 18 September)
Re: broken link on page http://www.w3.org/2001/06tips/reback (Wednesday, 17 September)
Re: Recommendations, and W3C Policy (Tuesday, 9 September)
Re: [qaframe-spec] What is testable? (Friday, 5 September)
Final: Minutes QAWG telecon Monday 25 August (Thursday, 4 September)
Re: [qaframe-spec] What is testable? (Thursday, 4 September)
Re: pls tell stories, be engaging, be brief (Thursday, 4 September)
Re: [qaframe-spec] conformance tools vs. broken specs (Thursday, 4 September)

Keith and Cecile

broken link on page http://www.w3.org/2001/06tips/reback (Tuesday, 16 September)

Lofton Henderson

Re: [qaframe-spec] conformance tools vs. broken specs (Thursday, 4 September)

Lynne Rosenthal

Minutes QA Working Group Teleconference 2002-09-22 (Friday, 26 September)
Reminder: October F2F meeting (Wednesday, 17 September)
Re: definition of test assertion (Monday, 15 September)
definition of atomic (Monday, 15 September)

Olivier Thereaux

[FYI] new QAIG homepage (Tuesday, 9 September)
Summer issue of "Month in QA" is available (Monday, 8 September)

Patrick Curran

Re: browsable test results (Friday, 12 September)
Re: % and "almost passed" Re: browsable test results (Friday, 12 September)
Re: browsable test results (Friday, 12 September)

Sandra Martinez

Minutes QA Working Group Teleconference 2002-09-15 (Friday, 26 September)

Sandro Hawke

Re: [Fwd: browsable test results] (Friday, 26 September)

Shadi Abou-Zahra

RE: [Fwd: browsable test results] (Friday, 12 September)

Victor Engmark

Re: QA Tips: Make readable URIs (Thursday, 18 September)
QA Tips: Make readable URIs (Monday, 15 September)

Last message date: Friday, 26 September 2003 22:39:00 UTC