W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-qa@w3.org > September 2003

Re: [qaframe-spec] What is testable?

From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
Date: Thu, 04 Sep 2003 03:06:32 +0200
To: "Jim Ley" <jim@jibbering.com>
Cc: <www-qa@w3.org>
Message-ID: <3fe988f5.391856760@smtp.bjoern.hoehrmann.de>

* Jim Ley wrote:
>> you could for example say that
>> something is testable if one could reasonably expect conformance testing
>> software to proof it.
>Testable should be able to encompass things which are not currently likely
>to be software computable, human testing could be sufficient, as long as
>pass/fail wasn't subjective.

So everything humans can test is considered testable? Under this
definition it makes small sense to talk about testability at all,
as something that is untestable is likely to be unimplementable.
Received on Wednesday, 3 September 2003 21:07:00 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:43:21 UTC