- From: Dominique Hazaël-Massieux <dom@w3.org>
- Date: 09 Sep 2003 09:29:18 +0200
- To: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
- Cc: www-qa@w3.org
Received on Tuesday, 9 September 2003 03:29:19 UTC
Le mar 09/09/2003 à 06:19, Bjoern Hoehrmann a écrit : > * Dominique Hazaël-Massieux wrote: > >I think it already does so: > >- CP 2.1 -> " A specification MUST list the classes of product for which > >it defines conformance requirements; [...]" > > So XSLT 1.0 does not conform to this checkpoint? Likely; XSLT 1.O only defines conformance of processors: http://www.w3.org/TR/xslt#conformance and says nothing about conformance of content (i.e. what is a conformant XSLT style sheet?). Dom -- Dominique Hazaël-Massieux - http://www.w3.org/People/Dom/ W3C/ERCIM mailto:dom@w3.org
Received on Tuesday, 9 September 2003 03:29:19 UTC