- From: Dominique Hazaël-Massieux <dom@w3.org>
- Date: 05 Sep 2003 12:04:59 +0200
- To: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
- Cc: david_marston@us.ibm.com, www-qa@w3.org
Received on Friday, 5 September 2003 06:05:00 UTC
Le ven 05/09/2003 à 01:29, Bjoern Hoehrmann a écrit : > I would appreciate if the Specification Guidelines require that all > requirements of a specification are directly bound to a class of product I think it already does so: - CP 2.1 -> " A specification MUST list the classes of product for which it defines conformance requirements; [...]" - CP 2.2 -> "The specification MUST define the conformance requirements for each class of product identified in checkpoint 2.1." (in the WG version, http://www.w3.org/QA/WG/2003/08/qaframe-spec#Gd-identify-what-conform) Dom -- Dominique Hazaël-Massieux - http://www.w3.org/People/Dom/ W3C/ERCIM mailto:dom@w3.org
Received on Friday, 5 September 2003 06:05:00 UTC