- From: (unknown charset) Alex Rousskov <rousskov@measurement-factory.com>
- Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2003 10:56:42 -0600 (MDT)
- To: (unknown charset) Dominique Hazaël-Massieux <dom@w3.org>
- Cc: (unknown charset) Victor Engmark <engmark@orakel.ntnu.no>, www-qa@w3.org
On Thu, 18 Sep 2003, Dominique [ISO-8859-1] Hazaël-Massieux wrote: > Now, that architectural fact doesn't mean that you should make your > URIs as unreadable as possible; there are some usability pros to > have readable URIs (as I tried to explain in my reply), but I think > their scope has also some limits. I did not discuss readability in my post, but your response makes it clear that the tip would benefit from separating these four aspects, at least: - ease of typing - ease of pronouncing (for those who cannot type) - ease of remembering - meaning (or lack of it) The title of the tip would have to be adjusted as well, I guess. I do not think we disagree on the first three aspects. Alex.
Received on Thursday, 18 September 2003 12:56:44 UTC