www-html@w3.org from April 2008 by date

Wednesday, 30 April 2008

• [XML Events 2] clarification request: WML reference Gregory J. Rosmaita

Monday, 28 April 2008

• Re: Radio and checkbox texts Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis
• Re: Radio and checkbox texts Anas R.
• Re: Radio and checkbox texts Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis

Sunday, 27 April 2008

• Issue: Should the datetime attribute be ISO 8601 compatable? Ernest Cline
• Re: Radio and checkbox texts Anas R.
• Re: Radio and checkbox texts Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis
• Re: Radio and checkbox texts Anas R.

Thursday, 24 April 2008

• Re: Radio and checkbox texts Jukka K. Korpela
• Re: Radio and checkbox texts k3liutZu

Wednesday, 23 April 2008

• Re: Radio and checkbox texts k3liutZu

Thursday, 24 April 2008

• Re: Radio and checkbox texts Jukka K. Korpela
• Re: Radio and checkbox texts David Dorward
• Re: Radio and checkbox texts Tina Holmboe
• Re: Radio and checkbox texts Jukka K. Korpela
• Re: Radio and checkbox texts David Dorward
• Re: Radio and checkbox texts Tina Holmboe
• Re: Radio and checkbox texts Sebastian Mendel
• Re: Radio and checkbox texts Sebastian Mendel
• Re: Radio and checkbox texts Anas R.
• Re: Radio and checkbox texts Anas R.
• Re: Radio and checkbox texts Sebastian Mendel
• Re: Radio and checkbox texts Jukka K. Korpela

Wednesday, 23 April 2008

• Re: Radio and checkbox texts Frank Ellermann
• Re: XHTML 1.0, section C14 Shane McCarron
• Re: Radio and checkbox texts Sebastian Mendel
• Re: Radio and checkbox texts Anas R.
• Re: Radio and checkbox texts Jukka K. Korpela
• Re: Radio and checkbox texts David Dorward
• Re: Question about HTML abbr and acronym tags Ian Hickson
• Radio and checkbox texts Anas R.

Tuesday, 22 April 2008

• Re: XHTML 1.0, section C14 David Dorward

Saturday, 19 April 2008

• Re: Representing Cancelations of Terms in Fractions Neil Soiffer

Friday, 18 April 2008

• Representing Cancelations of Terms in Fractions Eliot Kimber

Tuesday, 15 April 2008

• Re: less than normal importance/emphasis David Woolley
• Re: several messages about <i> and many related subjects Ca Phun Ung
• Re: less than normal importance/emphasis Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: less than normal importance/emphasis (was: several messages about <i> and many related subjects) Jukka K. Korpela
• Re: less than normal importance/emphasis Jukka K. Korpela
• Re: less than normal importance/emphasis (was: several messages about <i> and many related subjects) Tina Holmboe
• Re: less than normal importance/emphasis (was: several messages about <i> and many related subjects) Jukka K. Korpela
• Re: less than normal importance/emphasis (was: several messages about <i> and many related subjects) Tina Holmboe
• Re: less than normal importance/emphasis (was: several messages about <i> and many related subjects) Mikko Rantalainen
• Re: several messages about <i> and many related subjects Tina Holmboe
• Re: several messages about <i> and many related subjects Ca Phun Ung
• Re: several messages about <i> and many related subjects Philip TAYLOR

Wednesday, 9 April 2008

• Second last call: XHTML Role Attribute Module Steven Pemberton

Thursday, 10 April 2008

• Re: <UL> cited as <OL> (was : [css3-webfonts] Downloaded fonts should not...) Philip Taylor (Webmaster, Ret'd)
• SVG in HTML Review Comments Jeff Schiller

Tuesday, 8 April 2008

• Re: MathML content in the wild Laurens Holst

Monday, 7 April 2008

• (GTI) We Sincerely Welcome You to GTI Asia Taipei Expo 2008! David Liu

Saturday, 5 April 2008

• Re: proposed li:marker pseudo-class Philip TAYLOR
• Re: proposed li:marker pseudo-class Ernest Cline

Friday, 4 April 2008

• Re: proposed li:marker pseudo-class Philip TAYLOR
• Re: proposed li:marker pseudo-class Ernest Cline

Thursday, 3 April 2008

• Default value for Media Andreas Prilop

Wednesday, 2 April 2008

• Re: proposed li:marker pseudo-class Tina Holmboe
• Re: proposed li:marker pseudo-class David Woolley
• Re: proposed li:marker pseudo-class David Woolley
• Re: proposed li:marker pseudo-class Tina Holmboe
• Re: proposed li:marker pseudo-class David Woolley
• Re: proposed li:marker pseudo-class Tina Holmboe
• Re: proposed li:marker pseudo-class David Woolley
• Re: proposed li:marker pseudo-class Tina Holmboe
• Re: proposed li:marker pseudo-class David Woolley
• Re: proposed li:marker pseudo-class L. David Baron

Tuesday, 1 April 2008

• proposed li:marker pseudo-class Mark Alford
• [www-html] <none> Jan Vanek jr.

Monday, 31 March 2008

• Re: MathML content in the wild =?UTF-8?Q?

Last message date: Wednesday, 30 April 2008 01:14:14 UTC