- From: Sebastian Mendel <lists@sebastianmendel.de>
- Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 08:34:02 +0200
- To: Frank Ellermann <hmdmhdfmhdjmzdtjmzdtzktdkztdjz@gmail.com>
- CC: www-html@w3.org
Frank Ellermann schrieb: > Jukka K. Korpela wrote: >> The logical structure would be to put the input field >> and its label inside a container, roughly as you can say >> <label><input type="radio" name="x" value="1">option1</label> >> at present, but the element namel "label" is quite >> illogical. (E.g. "field" would be better.) > > Related radio buttons in a <fieldset> work, example: > > <fieldset><legend><!-- intentionally void --></legend> > <label title="world wide web"> > <input type="radio" name="meta" > value="lr=lang_en|lang_de" checked="checked" /> > <small> WWW </small>   > </label> > <label title="only W3C"> > <input type="radio" name="meta" > value="sitesearch=w3.org&domains=w3.org" /> > <small><a href="http://www.w3.org"> W3C </a></small>   > </label> > </fieldset> > > That worked with Lynx and a Netscape 2.02 "mozilla 3", the > titles had of course no effect, and the <legend> needed to > be empty, otherwise Lynx would try to do something "smart". why should this not work? i do not see any relation between your example and Jukkas comment -- Sebastian Mendel
Received on Thursday, 24 April 2008 06:32:31 UTC